Skip to main content

Diamond Dogs, Turquoise Days (SF) - Alastair Reynolds ***

Every author is allowed a title that isn't up to their usual quality, and for me this book is a low point in the output of the usually reliable Alastair Reynolds. The reasonably slim volume contains two novellas from 2003, set in the Revelation Space universe.

The first of the song-title named pieces, Diamond Dogs describes an exercise in futility, when two former friends and a number of mercenaries attempt to get through a deadly inverted escape room known as the Blood Spire. This 250-metre high structure consists of room after room - hundreds in all - each separated by a metal door with a mathematical puzzle to unlock it. These start simple and grow increasingly complex. Solve the puzzle and you get to the next room. Fail and there's a punishment that initially has the potential to maim and later to kill.

The motley crew set off to attempt to get to the summit of the spire. This seems mostly 'because it's there', though legend has it that there is something of immense technological value at the top. I have three problems with this. The action is too limited, rapidly becoming repetitive. It's hard to imagine why anyone would risk almost certain death with no guarantee of there being any benefit. And while most of the mathematical puzzles are far too obscure to be comprehensible, the first is simply wrong.

I know people have put themselves through extreme effort and considerable risk, say, to be first to the South Pole. But this is way beyond any such challenge. There are just too many, too difficult problems. To make matters worse, the doors get smaller and smaller, so continuing requires extreme body modification. Nothing's worth what the participants go through... and then the novella just ends with no real outcome. As for that dodgy puzzle, it involves prime numbers. We are told the first four primes are 'one, three, five and seven.' Unfortunately, they are two, three, five and seven. We're then told that eleven 'is the next one in the sequence. Thirteen's one prime too high...' So there's a prime between eleven and thirteen? Hmm.

The second part, Turquoise Days is significantly better. There's only one minor reference that links the two novellas - this one is set on one of the Pattern Juggler planets, where the ocean has been taken over by an alien structure that archives people's minds and can sometimes change a swimmer's brain to add capabilities from others. The narrative has a very slow start, but the second half picks up pace and is a genuinely interesting addition to the Revelation Space canon as Pattern Jugglers are frequently referenced, but are rarely given a deep dive (if you'll pardon the pun).

Revelation Space lovers will welcome any trifle that adds to the overall picture, but for everyone else it's only so-so.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more