Skip to main content

The Laughing Robot (SF) - Julia Ross ***

This is an odd one. I'm reviewing it because it's science fiction, but while it is very weak as an SF novel, if you totally ignore the technology bits, underlying them is a really interesting book about ageing. There's also a third aspect which verges into over-the-top satire... but we'll get onto that.

Let's do the good bit first. Julia Ross has been a nurse, social worker and Director of Social Services, not unlike her sixty-something protagonist Anna. Although the main thread of the story is decidedly slow, it does explore well some of the difficulties we face with an ageing population and younger age-groups who perhaps feel hard done by baby boomers. Ross addresses, for example, the difficulties of getting care and mechanisms such as lasting powers of attorney, designed to help the elderly who can no longer cope but which have the potential for misuse. 

Anna and her loving-but-user children provide a really good way to think about these issues many of us may face in the future. Ross also takes on the appalling use of Electro-Convulsive Therapy, an outdated treatment for depression that has no scientific basis and ought to have been banned years ago.

That over-the-top satire aspect is that Ross imagines the UK government taking over the Isle of Wight as a kind of vast retirement village where the elderly will be involuntarily sent for assessment and either allowed back home if able to support themselves or forced to stay in dubious conditions. This kind of thing only really works if it's funny, which it certainly isn't here.

But the real problem for a science fiction reviewer is the portrayal of future technology. (The framing is particularly odd as the novel seems to be set a couple of years ago, immediately after the Covid pandemic.) According to her bio, the author 'worked for several years in the digital world, learning about AI and predictive analytics' - unfortunately this doesn't come through at all in the writing.

Sometimes Ross seems to pick up a random technology concept and insert it with no obvious relation to what the concept actually refers to, notably the singularity, which is referenced several times without any real reflection of it in the storyline. But the worst thing is the portrayal of robots and autonomous vehicles. Over the course of a couple of years in the book, care robots go from something basic that is just about imaginable in the next few years to having sufficient autonomy to organise an escape from the Isle of Wight on behalf of their elderly owners. This is extremely anachronistic.

But the treatment of robots (which don't have the central role implied by the book's title in large swathes of it) pales in comparison to the way autonomous vehicles are represented. The Isle of Wight has self-driving vehicles called Notcars that force Anna off the road on her bicycle. When she complains, she is told 'The early Notcars aren’t fitted with sensors as a matter of course but they will be in the future.’ So they find their way around psychically? This is like a conventional car manufacturer saying 'Our cars aren't fitted with windscreens as a matter of course, but they will be in the future.'

A distinct oddity, then. I was impressed by the core storyline about ageing and care, but it was sadly let down by the science and technology.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more