Skip to main content

The Laughing Robot (SF) - Julia Ross ***

This is an odd one. I'm reviewing it because it's science fiction, but while it is very weak as an SF novel, if you totally ignore the technology bits, underlying them is a really interesting book about ageing. There's also a third aspect which verges into over-the-top satire... but we'll get onto that.

Let's do the good bit first. Julia Ross has been a nurse, social worker and Director of Social Services, not unlike her sixty-something protagonist Anna. Although the main thread of the story is decidedly slow, it does explore well some of the difficulties we face with an ageing population and younger age-groups who perhaps feel hard done by baby boomers. Ross addresses, for example, the difficulties of getting care and mechanisms such as lasting powers of attorney, designed to help the elderly who can no longer cope but which have the potential for misuse. 

Anna and her loving-but-user children provide a really good way to think about these issues many of us may face in the future. Ross also takes on the appalling use of Electro-Convulsive Therapy, an outdated treatment for depression that has no scientific basis and ought to have been banned years ago.

That over-the-top satire aspect is that Ross imagines the UK government taking over the Isle of Wight as a kind of vast retirement village where the elderly will be involuntarily sent for assessment and either allowed back home if able to support themselves or forced to stay in dubious conditions. This kind of thing only really works if it's funny, which it certainly isn't here.

But the real problem for a science fiction reviewer is the portrayal of future technology. (The framing is particularly odd as the novel seems to be set a couple of years ago, immediately after the Covid pandemic.) According to her bio, the author 'worked for several years in the digital world, learning about AI and predictive analytics' - unfortunately this doesn't come through at all in the writing.

Sometimes Ross seems to pick up a random technology concept and insert it with no obvious relation to what the concept actually refers to, notably the singularity, which is referenced several times without any real reflection of it in the storyline. But the worst thing is the portrayal of robots and autonomous vehicles. Over the course of a couple of years in the book, care robots go from something basic that is just about imaginable in the next few years to having sufficient autonomy to organise an escape from the Isle of Wight on behalf of their elderly owners. This is extremely anachronistic.

But the treatment of robots (which don't have the central role implied by the book's title in large swathes of it) pales in comparison to the way autonomous vehicles are represented. The Isle of Wight has self-driving vehicles called Notcars that force Anna off the road on her bicycle. When she complains, she is told 'The early Notcars aren’t fitted with sensors as a matter of course but they will be in the future.’ So they find their way around psychically? This is like a conventional car manufacturer saying 'Our cars aren't fitted with windscreens as a matter of course, but they will be in the future.'

A distinct oddity, then. I was impressed by the core storyline about ageing and care, but it was sadly let down by the science and technology.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more