Skip to main content

The Laughing Robot (SF) - Julia Ross ***

This is an odd one. I'm reviewing it because it's science fiction, but while it is very weak as an SF novel, if you totally ignore the technology bits, underlying them is a really interesting book about ageing. There's also a third aspect which verges into over-the-top satire... but we'll get onto that.

Let's do the good bit first. Julia Ross has been a nurse, social worker and Director of Social Services, not unlike her sixty-something protagonist Anna. Although the main thread of the story is decidedly slow, it does explore well some of the difficulties we face with an ageing population and younger age-groups who perhaps feel hard done by baby boomers. Ross addresses, for example, the difficulties of getting care and mechanisms such as lasting powers of attorney, designed to help the elderly who can no longer cope but which have the potential for misuse. 

Anna and her loving-but-user children provide a really good way to think about these issues many of us may face in the future. Ross also takes on the appalling use of Electro-Convulsive Therapy, an outdated treatment for depression that has no scientific basis and ought to have been banned years ago.

That over-the-top satire aspect is that Ross imagines the UK government taking over the Isle of Wight as a kind of vast retirement village where the elderly will be involuntarily sent for assessment and either allowed back home if able to support themselves or forced to stay in dubious conditions. This kind of thing only really works if it's funny, which it certainly isn't here.

But the real problem for a science fiction reviewer is the portrayal of future technology. (The framing is particularly odd as the novel seems to be set a couple of years ago, immediately after the Covid pandemic.) According to her bio, the author 'worked for several years in the digital world, learning about AI and predictive analytics' - unfortunately this doesn't come through at all in the writing.

Sometimes Ross seems to pick up a random technology concept and insert it with no obvious relation to what the concept actually refers to, notably the singularity, which is referenced several times without any real reflection of it in the storyline. But the worst thing is the portrayal of robots and autonomous vehicles. Over the course of a couple of years in the book, care robots go from something basic that is just about imaginable in the next few years to having sufficient autonomy to organise an escape from the Isle of Wight on behalf of their elderly owners. This is extremely anachronistic.

But the treatment of robots (which don't have the central role implied by the book's title in large swathes of it) pales in comparison to the way autonomous vehicles are represented. The Isle of Wight has self-driving vehicles called Notcars that force Anna off the road on her bicycle. When she complains, she is told 'The early Notcars aren’t fitted with sensors as a matter of course but they will be in the future.’ So they find their way around psychically? This is like a conventional car manufacturer saying 'Our cars aren't fitted with windscreens as a matter of course, but they will be in the future.'

A distinct oddity, then. I was impressed by the core storyline about ageing and care, but it was sadly let down by the science and technology.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...
Post a Comment
Read more