Skip to main content

The Little Book of Weather - Adam Scaife ***

Many of us from the UK of a certain age will remember a series of little hardback books called The Observer's book of... whatever - this new series from Princeton University Press harks back to this format, in this case taking on the weather. As yet, every other book in the series is on a type of organism, ranging from beetles and dinosaurs to trees - so it's interesting to see if the format works for a rather different topic.

The structure is a familiar one in illustrated book series of two-page spreads, covering a handful of topics under each of a range of categories - in this case 12 sections. Unfortunately, for me this felt like a book that should have had far bigger pages condensed down to a point where it might have been beneficial to provide it with a free magnifying glass. The text was very small indeed.

This is a shame, as much of the content is interesting,  cramming in more information than is common in the illustrated spreads style. I found the order of the sections somewhat arbitrary - so, for instance, folklore which predates the science doesn't turn up until section 10, and similarly forecasting which is so central to our interest in the weather comes quite late. But some of the sections were entertainingly unexpected - so, for instance, there's one on weather and historical events (I was a bit disappointed not to have the Spanish Armada as one of these). Another covers 'curious facts' from space weather to gigantism in insects.

Of course, all the basics are there too - from weather phenomena to climate change. Perhaps the only significant omission was attempts at weather control (which would have been timely given conspiracy theories over recent US hurricanes).

It's a nice little book... just noticeably too little.

Hardback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...