Skip to main content

Einstein and the Quantum Revolutions - Alain Aspect ***

What an opportunity missed. This little book (very little) provided a wonderful opportunity for one of the great physicists of the last 50 years to bring to life his work on quantum entanglement - a topic in which he excels - but instead all we get is a very high level description of the history of the subject.

The book is clearly modelled on Carlo Rovelli's massive-selling Seven Brief Lessons (down to the cover design) - but here we get significantly less than even that provided. Alain Aspect identifies two quantum revolutions (although Einstein, of course features, the book isn't about Einstein, only seeming to appear in the title for visibility). The first was the introduction of quantum physics itself - the second starts in the 1960s with Bell's Theorem, opening up the possibility of first testing the weird reality of quantum entanglement, then into the applications of entanglement in quantum computing and quantum encryption.

Aspect's work was fundamental to showing that quantum theory really did do away with local reality - that entangled quantum particles were genuinely able to effectively communicate (even though we can't control what they communicate) instantaneously at any distance. It would have been fascinating and delightful to get some personal experience, some context for his work - but there's nothing. 

There's no mention, for example, of the young Alain Aspect, volunteering as an aid worker in Cameroon in 1971, giving him a chance to immerse himself in the then-largely neglected controversies that had arisen in quantum physics in the 1930s and to discover John Bell's intriguing but then obscure paper showing that the abilities of entanglement could be tested. Similarly, when we get to Aspect's groundbreaking experiment, although David Kaiser in his Foreword mentions the how remarkable it was that Aspect's experiment was able to change its setup ten million times faster than the blink of an eye, there is no mention of how Aspect achieved this (remarkable in itself). Sadder still, we get no personal account of the trials and tribulations involved to give a feel for what making the experiment work entailed.

Compare this with a lecture I heard Anton Zeilinger (co-recipient of the Nobel Prize with Aspect) give on his work on entanglement. This gave us the necessary background, but also took the audience (in narrative) into the sewers of Vienna to discover some of the obstacles they had overcome. An equivalent from Aspect would have been absolutely fascinating - but instead we only got a brief, detached summary of entanglement and its implications. 

For entanglement groupies like me, anything about the subject is worth having, and I'm glad to be able to read (translated from the French by Teresa Lavender Fagan) some words from the great man: I'd certainly not discourage anyone with an interest from buying a copy. We are promised by the back cover that 'a Nobel Laureate offers a brief lesson on physics' biggest mystery' - brief it certainly is. But, might I modestly suggest, a book like The God Effect will give far more depth on entanglement without ever getting over-technical - and such titles give far more insight into the scientists involved than can be gleaned from such a dry summary. 

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...
Post a Comment
Read more

God: the Science, the Evidence - Michel-Yves Bolloré and Olivier Bonnassies ***

This is, to say the least, an oddity, but a fascinating one. A translation of a French bestseller, it aims to put forward an examination of the scientific evidence for the existence of a deity… and various other things, as this is a very oddly structured book (more on that in a moment). In The God Delusion , Richard Dawkins suggested that we should treat the existence of God as a scientific claim, which is exactly what the authors do reasonably well in the main part of the book. They argue that three pieces of scientific evidence in particular are supportive of the existence of a (generic) creator of the universe. These are that the universe had a beginning, the fine tuning of natural constants and the unlikeliness of life.  To support their evidence, Bolloré and Bonnassies give a reasonable introduction to thermodynamics and cosmology. They suggest that the expected heat death of the universe implies a beginning (for good thermodynamic reasons), and rightly give the impression tha...
Post a Comment
Read more