Skip to main content

Einstein and the Quantum Revolutions - Alain Aspect ***

What an opportunity missed. This little book (very little) provided a wonderful opportunity for one of the great physicists of the last 50 years to bring to life his work on quantum entanglement - a topic in which he excels - but instead all we get is a very high level description of the history of the subject.

The book is clearly modelled on Carlo Rovelli's massive-selling Seven Brief Lessons (down to the cover design) - but here we get significantly less than even that provided. Alain Aspect identifies two quantum revolutions (although Einstein, of course features, the book isn't about Einstein, only seeming to appear in the title for visibility). The first was the introduction of quantum physics itself - the second starts in the 1960s with Bell's Theorem, opening up the possibility of first testing the weird reality of quantum entanglement, then into the applications of entanglement in quantum computing and quantum encryption.

Aspect's work was fundamental to showing that quantum theory really did do away with local reality - that entangled quantum particles were genuinely able to effectively communicate (even though we can't control what they communicate) instantaneously at any distance. It would have been fascinating and delightful to get some personal experience, some context for his work - but there's nothing. 

There's no mention, for example, of the young Alain Aspect, volunteering as an aid worker in Cameroon in 1971, giving him a chance to immerse himself in the then-largely neglected controversies that had arisen in quantum physics in the 1930s and to discover John Bell's intriguing but then obscure paper showing that the abilities of entanglement could be tested. Similarly, when we get to Aspect's groundbreaking experiment, although David Kaiser in his Foreword mentions the how remarkable it was that Aspect's experiment was able to change its setup ten million times faster than the blink of an eye, there is no mention of how Aspect achieved this (remarkable in itself). Sadder still, we get no personal account of the trials and tribulations involved to give a feel for what making the experiment work entailed.

Compare this with a lecture I heard Anton Zeilinger (co-recipient of the Nobel Prize with Aspect) give on his work on entanglement. This gave us the necessary background, but also took the audience (in narrative) into the sewers of Vienna to discover some of the obstacles they had overcome. An equivalent from Aspect would have been absolutely fascinating - but instead we only got a brief, detached summary of entanglement and its implications. 

For entanglement groupies like me, anything about the subject is worth having, and I'm glad to be able to read (translated from the French by Teresa Lavender Fagan) some words from the great man: I'd certainly not discourage anyone with an interest from buying a copy. We are promised by the back cover that 'a Nobel Laureate offers a brief lesson on physics' biggest mystery' - brief it certainly is. But, might I modestly suggest, a book like The God Effect will give far more depth on entanglement without ever getting over-technical - and such titles give far more insight into the scientists involved than can be gleaned from such a dry summary. 

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more