Skip to main content

Einstein and the Quantum Revolutions - Alain Aspect ***

What an opportunity missed. This little book (very little) provided a wonderful opportunity for one of the great physicists of the last 50 years to bring to life his work on quantum entanglement - a topic in which he excels - but instead all we get is a very high level description of the history of the subject.

The book is clearly modelled on Carlo Rovelli's massive-selling Seven Brief Lessons (down to the cover design) - but here we get significantly less than even that provided. Alain Aspect identifies two quantum revolutions (although Einstein, of course features, the book isn't about Einstein, only seeming to appear in the title for visibility). The first was the introduction of quantum physics itself - the second starts in the 1960s with Bell's Theorem, opening up the possibility of first testing the weird reality of quantum entanglement, then into the applications of entanglement in quantum computing and quantum encryption.

Aspect's work was fundamental to showing that quantum theory really did do away with local reality - that entangled quantum particles were genuinely able to effectively communicate (even though we can't control what they communicate) instantaneously at any distance. It would have been fascinating and delightful to get some personal experience, some context for his work - but there's nothing. 

There's no mention, for example, of the young Alain Aspect, volunteering as an aid worker in Cameroon in 1971, giving him a chance to immerse himself in the then-largely neglected controversies that had arisen in quantum physics in the 1930s and to discover John Bell's intriguing but then obscure paper showing that the abilities of entanglement could be tested. Similarly, when we get to Aspect's groundbreaking experiment, although David Kaiser in his Foreword mentions the how remarkable it was that Aspect's experiment was able to change its setup ten million times faster than the blink of an eye, there is no mention of how Aspect achieved this (remarkable in itself). Sadder still, we get no personal account of the trials and tribulations involved to give a feel for what making the experiment work entailed.

Compare this with a lecture I heard Anton Zeilinger (co-recipient of the Nobel Prize with Aspect) give on his work on entanglement. This gave us the necessary background, but also took the audience (in narrative) into the sewers of Vienna to discover some of the obstacles they had overcome. An equivalent from Aspect would have been absolutely fascinating - but instead we only got a brief, detached summary of entanglement and its implications. 

For entanglement groupies like me, anything about the subject is worth having, and I'm glad to be able to read (translated from the French by Teresa Lavender Fagan) some words from the great man: I'd certainly not discourage anyone with an interest from buying a copy. We are promised by the back cover that 'a Nobel Laureate offers a brief lesson on physics' biggest mystery' - brief it certainly is. But, might I modestly suggest, a book like The God Effect will give far more depth on entanglement without ever getting over-technical - and such titles give far more insight into the scientists involved than can be gleaned from such a dry summary. 

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Infinity Machine - Sebastian Mallaby ****

It's very quickly clear that Sebastian Mallaby is a huge Demis Hassabis fan - writing about the only child prodigy and teen genius ever who was also a nice, rounded personality. After a few chapters, though, things settle down (I'm reminded of Douglas Adams' description of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy ) and we get a good, solid trip through the journey that gave us DeepMind, their AlphaGo and AlphaFold programs, the sudden explosion of competition on the AI front and thoughts on artificial general intelligence. Although Mallaby does occasionally still go into fan mode - reading this you would think that AlphaFold had successfully perfectly predicted the structure of every protein, where it is usually not sufficiently accurate for its results to have direct practical application - we get a real feel for the way this relatively unusual company was swiftly and successfully developed away from Silicon Valley. It's readable and gives an important understanding of...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nanotechnology - Rahul Rao ****

There was a time when nanotechnology was both going to transform the world and wipe us out - a similar position to our view of AI today. On the positive transformation side there was K. Eric Drexler's visions in the 1986 Engines of Creation. Arguably as much science fiction as engineering possibilities, it predicted the ability to use vast armies of assemblers to put objects together from individual atoms.  On the negative side was the vision of grey goo, out of control nanotechnology consuming all in its path as it made more and more copies of itself. In 2003, for instance, the then Prince Charles made the headlines  when newspapers reported ‘The prince has raised the spectre of the “grey goo” catastrophe in which sub-microscopic machines designed to share intelligence and replicate themselves take over and devour the planet.’ These days the expectations have been eased down a notch or two. Where nanotechnology has succeeded, it has been with the likes of atom-thick mat...
Post a Comment
Read more