Review: Galactic North (SF) - Alastair Reynolds ****

Publishing lore has it that collections of short stories don't sell - yet shorter writing often works wonderfully in science fiction and has been a major contributor to SF history. I (like, I suspect, other SF enthusiasts) would like to see many more such books. This one is diving into the past (2006), but if you have read any books set in Alastair Reynolds' Revelation Space universe (which includes the Prefect Dreyfus novels) it does a brilliant job of filling in some gaps (past and future) of that massive world building exercise.

As a collection it's unusual both in that all eight of its contents fit in that same setting, and that it mostly comprises novellas and long stories, ranging in length from 17 to 67 pages. I personally prefer more shorts and greater variety, but the way that it gives context for the novels is impressive.

Three of the stories are arguably SF horror - picking up on a recurring theme of the impact of the future ability of science to modify humans that runs through most of collection, whether through additions to the brain or biological modifications to deal with different environments. I was least impressed by the title story, in that it's one of those efforts that spans many thousands of years, in this case to illustrate the outcome of a major technological mistake that is effectively destroying animal life in the galaxy. The underlying plot in this one seems strangely weak for Reynolds.

However, the rest all work well and take us into what it is to be human in a way that pretentious literary fiction is supposed to but rarely does. Well worth a look if, like me, you missed it when it came out.

Paperback:

Kindle:
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge Introducing … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as … for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily, Introducing Artificial Intelligence is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader. We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard. This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...

Search This Blog