Dots and Lines - Anthony Bonato ***

Networks are of huge significance to life and technology, so it was refreshing to read a popular maths title on the subject. I was a little concerned when, in the introductory chapter, Anthony Bonato spent quite a while discussing network/graph theory jargon - we really don't need to know that a network is referred to as G with nodes represented by V and edges by E, let alone the meaning of 'heavy tailed'. There is absolutely no need to have such technical-speak in a popular title. Unfortunately, he goes bombarding us with terminology in further chapters: it can be painful, especially when we are told a directed graph is known as a digraph, when I suspect most people outside of the graph theory community would consider a digraph a two letter phoneme.

Despite the relentless terminology we do learn a lot about networks and their applications, from Google's PageRank to Bacon numbers and from COVID infections to optimising security camera placement. As a writer, I was interested in the examination of character networks in books, though I would have liked to have seen a justification for linking characters if (and only if) their names appeared '15 words or less apart' in the text - it seems an arbitrary decision which should be justified.

The writing style was sometimes a touch saccharin. For example, on the night of the 2016 US election we are told that Bonato and a colleague 'stopped by a campus café, where I savoured a peppermint tea and a vegan cookie, reclining in a comfy chair.' Apart from confirming stereotypes about academics, this kind of thing really adds very little to the narrative that's of interest to the reader.

This is a difficult book to rate, neither fish nor fowl - it's a bit too technical for the general reader, but vague in its description of models and algorithms for someone with a mathematical or computing background. So, for example, we are told that the Louvain algorithm is one of the best for finding communities in networks. Apparently it uses the 'technical notion of modularity', but a detailed discussion of modularity is 'beyond our scope here', so we just get a vague sentence on what it does. In terms of discovering the range of potential applications of networks/graph theory, it's solidly four star, but I can't give it that as a satisfying popular maths title.

Hardback:

Kindle:
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support our online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all reviews and Brian's online articles or subscribe free here

Comments

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically? Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...

Search This Blog