Skip to main content

Love Triangle - Matt Parker ****

There's no doubt that Matt Parker can make practically anything interesting - this is one of the few books I've ever read where I genuinely enjoyed the introduction. But there was a real challenge here. In a review of a recent book about maps and mathematics I said 'I always found [geometry and trigonometry] the most tedious aspect of maths.' Take a look at the subtitle here: 'the life-changing magic of trigonometry'.

It's no surprise that the 'trig' word turns up - it literally means triangle measuring (trigon is an obsolete term for a triangle). But it inevitably raises a shudder for many. Parker does acknowledge this in his pure trigonometry section, suggesting it's primarily because it's a pain remembering what tan and cos and sin refer to, but pointing out convincingly how useful and powerful trigonometry is. I confess, however, it was still my least-favourite chapter in the book.

Thankfully there's a lot more, introduced with Parker's bubbly brand of humour. If you've ever seen him on stage, he writes as he performs - everything is handled in a light, energetic, slightly gawky way. Occasionally his word-play gets a touch irritating, but maybe that's just me. That doesn't get in the way of his ability to make maths more interesting. When, for instance, he's talking about the non-intuitive Heron's formula that gives the area of a triangle from the lengths of its sides he notes that it 'makes me irrationally angry', which somehow makes it more approachable.

The book goes into triangles in a huge range of applications and oddities, ranging from the balloon and pigs story featured on the cover to how to cut a sandwich into three pieces equal in area and with an equal amount of crust, or to the many engineering and architectural uses of triangles - we are taken into the constant tension between the architect who wants an outcome and the engineer having to make the outcome feasible... often using triangles. They aren't usually alone in such circumstances. We get meshes of triangles and 3D shapes incorporating triangles (and, to be fair, one or two other shapes). We get triangle-related art effects and Fourier transforms. It's triangle heaven.

For much of the time this is an extremely enjoyable read, but sometimes it does suffer from Parker's over-enthusiasm. There is a big difference between being interested in a subject and being obsessed with it. Readers are likely to fit in the first camp, while Parker is unashamedly living in the second. This produces that engaging enthusiasm, but it also means that at times Parker can spend too many words on a topic, leaving the reader thinking 'time to move on'. This is perhaps most obvious in the chapter on different (often weird) shaped solids, but comes up regularly. I didn't find this a big problem, but it keeps the book from perfection.

If you are interested in maths, and particularly if (like me) you are interested in maths but are no enthusiast for geometry and trig, be prepared for pleasant surprises: this is an excellent addition to your shelves.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more