Skip to main content

Love Triangle - Matt Parker ****

There's no doubt that Matt Parker can make practically anything interesting - this is one of the few books I've ever read where I genuinely enjoyed the introduction. But there was a real challenge here. In a review of a recent book about maps and mathematics I said 'I always found [geometry and trigonometry] the most tedious aspect of maths.' Take a look at the subtitle here: 'the life-changing magic of trigonometry'.

It's no surprise that the 'trig' word turns up - it literally means triangle measuring (trigon is an obsolete term for a triangle). But it inevitably raises a shudder for many. Parker does acknowledge this in his pure trigonometry section, suggesting it's primarily because it's a pain remembering what tan and cos and sin refer to, but pointing out convincingly how useful and powerful trigonometry is. I confess, however, it was still my least-favourite chapter in the book.

Thankfully there's a lot more, introduced with Parker's bubbly brand of humour. If you've ever seen him on stage, he writes as he performs - everything is handled in a light, energetic, slightly gawky way. Occasionally his word-play gets a touch irritating, but maybe that's just me. That doesn't get in the way of his ability to make maths more interesting. When, for instance, he's talking about the non-intuitive Heron's formula that gives the area of a triangle from the lengths of its sides he notes that it 'makes me irrationally angry', which somehow makes it more approachable.

The book goes into triangles in a huge range of applications and oddities, ranging from the balloon and pigs story featured on the cover to how to cut a sandwich into three pieces equal in area and with an equal amount of crust, or to the many engineering and architectural uses of triangles - we are taken into the constant tension between the architect who wants an outcome and the engineer having to make the outcome feasible... often using triangles. They aren't usually alone in such circumstances. We get meshes of triangles and 3D shapes incorporating triangles (and, to be fair, one or two other shapes). We get triangle-related art effects and Fourier transforms. It's triangle heaven.

For much of the time this is an extremely enjoyable read, but sometimes it does suffer from Parker's over-enthusiasm. There is a big difference between being interested in a subject and being obsessed with it. Readers are likely to fit in the first camp, while Parker is unashamedly living in the second. This produces that engaging enthusiasm, but it also means that at times Parker can spend too many words on a topic, leaving the reader thinking 'time to move on'. This is perhaps most obvious in the chapter on different (often weird) shaped solids, but comes up regularly. I didn't find this a big problem, but it keeps the book from perfection.

If you are interested in maths, and particularly if (like me) you are interested in maths but are no enthusiast for geometry and trig, be prepared for pleasant surprises: this is an excellent addition to your shelves.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Decline and Fall of the Human Empire - Henry Gee ****

In his last book, Henry Gee impressed with his A (Very) Short History of Life on Earth - this time he zooms in on one very specific aspect of life on Earth - humans - and gives us not just a history, but a prediction of the future - our extinction. The book starts with an entertaining prologue, to an extent bemoaning our obsession with dinosaurs, a story that leads, inexorably towards extinction. This is a fate, Gee points out, that will occur for every species, including our own. We then cover three potential stages of the rise and fall of humanity (the book's title is purposely modelled on Gibbon) - Rise, Fall and Escape. Gee's speciality is palaeontology and in the first section he takes us back to explore as much as we can know from the extremely patchy fossil record of the origins of the human family, the genus Homo and the eventual dominance of Homo sapiens , pushing out any remaining members of other closely related species. As we move onto the Fall section, Gee gives ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Autobiography – Charles Darwin ****

I have to confess to putting off reading this book until the last moment, as I expected it to be a typical piece of Victorian sentimental unreadable stodge. I was wrong. Darwin’s little book (only 150 small pages with appendices) was originally written for his own children, and displays a very personal style of writing – though, as son Francis comments, his style was always more populist than was common then: “In writing he sometimes showed the same strong tendency to strong expressions that he did in conversation. Thus in the Origin, p440, there is a description of a larvel [sic] cirripede ‘with six pairs of beautifully constructed natatory legs, a pair of magnificent compound eyes and extremely complex antennae’. We used to laugh at him for this sentence, which we compared to an advertisement.” The main book is delightful because it demonstrates Darwin’s self-depreciating modesty, and the fascinating path he took from enthusiastic shooter of game, to amateur geologist (still his...
Post a Comment
Read more

Zero Degrees of Empathy [The Science of Evil] – Simon Baron-Cohen ***

I’ve been a real fan of previous books by Simon Baron-Cohen like  The Essential Difference , so opening this was one was a pleasant prospect. What I found was a book that wasn’t  bad … but that could have been a lot better. I got the impression of a book that had been rushed out without a lot of work going into it. The thesis at the heart of the book – that one of the important ‘circuits’ of the brain is the one dealing with empathy, and that individuals sit on an empathy spectrum, with some residing at zero degrees of empathy – is an interesting one. Baron-Cohen introduces us to three key personality types he defines as ‘zero-negative’ including psychopaths, plus types that are ‘zero-positive’ like those with Asperger’s. In a way both of these definitions are odd, in that his zero-negatives can actually have a lot of the kind of empathy that involves being able to read another person’s emotional state, and his zero-negatives can have a lot of the kind of empathy i...
Post a Comment
Read more