Skip to main content

Love Triangle - Matt Parker ****

There's no doubt that Matt Parker can make practically anything interesting - this is one of the few books I've ever read where I genuinely enjoyed the introduction. But there was a real challenge here. In a review of a recent book about maps and mathematics I said 'I always found [geometry and trigonometry] the most tedious aspect of maths.' Take a look at the subtitle here: 'the life-changing magic of trigonometry'.

It's no surprise that the 'trig' word turns up - it literally means triangle measuring (trigon is an obsolete term for a triangle). But it inevitably raises a shudder for many. Parker does acknowledge this in his pure trigonometry section, suggesting it's primarily because it's a pain remembering what tan and cos and sin refer to, but pointing out convincingly how useful and powerful trigonometry is. I confess, however, it was still my least-favourite chapter in the book.

Thankfully there's a lot more, introduced with Parker's bubbly brand of humour. If you've ever seen him on stage, he writes as he performs - everything is handled in a light, energetic, slightly gawky way. Occasionally his word-play gets a touch irritating, but maybe that's just me. That doesn't get in the way of his ability to make maths more interesting. When, for instance, he's talking about the non-intuitive Heron's formula that gives the area of a triangle from the lengths of its sides he notes that it 'makes me irrationally angry', which somehow makes it more approachable.

The book goes into triangles in a huge range of applications and oddities, ranging from the balloon and pigs story featured on the cover to how to cut a sandwich into three pieces equal in area and with an equal amount of crust, or to the many engineering and architectural uses of triangles - we are taken into the constant tension between the architect who wants an outcome and the engineer having to make the outcome feasible... often using triangles. They aren't usually alone in such circumstances. We get meshes of triangles and 3D shapes incorporating triangles (and, to be fair, one or two other shapes). We get triangle-related art effects and Fourier transforms. It's triangle heaven.

For much of the time this is an extremely enjoyable read, but sometimes it does suffer from Parker's over-enthusiasm. There is a big difference between being interested in a subject and being obsessed with it. Readers are likely to fit in the first camp, while Parker is unashamedly living in the second. This produces that engaging enthusiasm, but it also means that at times Parker can spend too many words on a topic, leaving the reader thinking 'time to move on'. This is perhaps most obvious in the chapter on different (often weird) shaped solids, but comes up regularly. I didn't find this a big problem, but it keeps the book from perfection.

If you are interested in maths, and particularly if (like me) you are interested in maths but are no enthusiast for geometry and trig, be prepared for pleasant surprises: this is an excellent addition to your shelves.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more