Skip to main content

The Truth and Other Stories (SF) - Stanislaw Lem ***

To the SF enthusiast, Polish writer Stanislaw Lem is often regarded in a similar way a reader of mundane fiction might consider Joyce or Proust. A writer that you may well never have read, but you know that they are amongst the greats because the literati tell you so. I was pretty much in that category - I'd attempted to watch the 1972 Tarkovsky film of what's often regarded as Lem's masterpiece, Solaris, but I'd never ventured into what felt like writing that was bound to be obscure and impenetrable.

As a result, when I noticed that, to mark Lem's 100th anniversary, MIT Press had put out a collection of Lem short stories, I leapt at the chance to explore his writing in a relatively painless way. The collection spans much of Lem's writing career, beginning with a piece from the late 50s and coming up to 1993. Unfortunately, of the 12 stories in the book only two worked well as a piece of fiction, and one of those had problems with the science.

The early stories suffered from something that Kim Stanley Robinson admits in the effusive introduction - Lem seemed not to have paid much attention to existing SF writing and reproduced many themes that by the 50s were fairly well trodden. Unfortunately he didn't bring anything new, other than dragging out what probably only deserved to be a couple of thousand words to four or five times the length with interminable unnecessary text. Sometimes this is in the form of dire dialogue such as 'Mind you, opinions are divided - some people think contact with another world would bring us benefits, and others think it would bring on the "war of the worlds.' Which side are you on?'

Robinson tells us that part of Lem's appeal is his sense of humour, but it's hard to spot that in these stories. Mind you, Robinson's example of a typical Lem quip is 'Measured by the yardstick of Dick's black pessimism, Schopenhauer's philosophy of life seems to be real joie de vivre,' so I suppose it's too much to expect a laugh out loud result.

Broadly the stories seem to fit into three categories. The earlier ones have a fairly straightforward plot, obscured by the shaggy dog story length of the lead ups to the conclusion. A good example would be The Friend from 1959. It's 50 pages long, most of which consists of a stranger describing his requirements for an electronic device in an intensely elliptical and frustrating fashion. In the last handful of pages we get a rather Stephen Kingesque denouement, but the build-up is tedious in the extreme.

We then get into what seems to be an obscurantist phase, where the language is not very helpful. Here's the opening to the 1962 story The Journal: 'And so we are seized by a new desire for investigation, and we meet the preliminary condition: to limit ourselves, without which we can do nothing, for we are everything. Here, plainly, everything and nothing mean one and the same thing, for only he who is everything can do nothing: in perfection, which is a persistent attribute of ours - unless we should wish, as in the present case, to suspend it - there is room for any kind of aspiration, because it is an end point...' and so it goes on. I didn't get very far with this one.

Finally, there are a couple of later pieces that return to some degree of readability. For me, by far the most interesting stories are The Truth and One Hundred and Thirty-Seven Seconds. The first of these features a really interesting concept, but is sadly rather distorted by the fact that Lem clearly has no idea what plasma (something central to the story) is like. He seems to have thought that a plasma is basically a nuclear explosion waiting to happen, something uncontrollable, vastly energetic and potentially devastating. It's probably a good thing he never owned a plasma TV or knew that there's plasma in a candle flame. The second story is entertaining, though it's really fantasy rather than science fiction.

Altogether, then, not a great experience. If you are a Lem fan, I'm sure you will want to add this to your collection, as it contains nine previously untranslated stories - but I'm afraid it hasn't usefully demonstrated to me what all the fuss is about.

Hardback: 
Bookshop.org

  

Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Roger Highfield - Stephen Hawking: genius at work interview

Roger Highfield OBE is the Science Director of the Science Museum Group. Roger has visiting professorships at the Department of Chemistry, UCL, and at the Dunn School, University of Oxford, is a Fellow of the Academy of Medical Sciences, and a member of the Medical Research Council and Longitude Committee. He has written or co-authored ten popular science books, including two bestsellers. His latest title is Stephen Hawking: genius at work . Why science? There are three answers to this question, depending on context: Apollo; Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, along with the world’s worst nuclear accident at Chernobyl; and, finally, Nullius in verba . Growing up I enjoyed the sciencey side of TV programmes like Thunderbirds and The Avengers but became completely besotted when, in short trousers, I gazed up at the moon knowing that two astronauts had paid it a visit. As the Apollo programme unfolded, I became utterly obsessed. Today, more than half a century later, the moon landings are

Space Oddities - Harry Cliff *****

In this delightfully readable book, Harry Cliff takes us into the anomalies that are starting to make areas of physics seems to be nearing a paradigm shift, just as occurred in the past with relativity and quantum theory. We start with, we are introduced to some past anomalies linked to changes in viewpoint, such as the precession of Mercury (explained by general relativity, though originally blamed on an undiscovered planet near the Sun), and then move on to a few examples of apparent discoveries being wrong: the BICEP2 evidence for inflation (where the result was caused by dust, not the polarisation being studied),  the disappearance of an interesting blip in LHC results, and an apparent mistake in the manipulation of numbers that resulted in alleged discovery of dark matter particles. These are used to explain how statistics plays a part, and the significance of sigmas . We go on to explore a range of anomalies in particle physics and cosmology that may indicate either a breakdown i

Splinters of Infinity - Mark Wolverton ****

Many of us who read popular science regularly will be aware of the 'great debate' between American astronomers Harlow Shapley and Heber Curtis in 1920 over whether the universe was a single galaxy or many. Less familiar is the clash in the 1930s between American Nobel Prize winners Robert Millikan and Arthur Compton over the nature of cosmic rays. This not a book about the nature of cosmic rays as we now understand them, but rather explores this confrontation between heavyweight scientists. Millikan was the first in the fray, and often wrongly named in the press as discoverer of cosmic rays. He believed that this high energy radiation from above was made up of photons that ionised atoms in the atmosphere. One of the reasons he was determined that they should be photons was that this fitted with his thesis that the universe was in a constant state of creation: these photons, he thought, were produced in the birth of new atoms. This view seems to have been primarily driven by re