Skip to main content

The Space Business - Andrew May ****

When I was young, space travel was very exciting because science fiction was becoming reality. First there were people in space and then the landings on the Moon. However, there was one big difference between what I read in SF and what was happening on the news. Fictional space travel was largely a matter of private enterprise, whether it was down to the work of an individual mad scientist or a large corporation. But the reality left leaving Earth in the hands of two superpower nations. Of course, there were exceptions in the fiction, but even in something like Star Trek, where the central focus was a ship owned by supranational authorities, there were still plenty of privately owned ships in space.

Now, though, reality is catching up with the fiction. Companies such as SpaceX and Blue Origin are bringing a whole new entrepreneurial flair to the design and build of rockets, outpacing the slow and steady approach of NASA. In The Space Business, Andrew May takes us on a tour of this new look at the way we interact with space - and discovers whether there are real commercial opportunities, or it's just an expensive hobby for science fiction loving billionaires.

Along the way, May ties neatly in with science fiction writers' visions of commercial space travel, from space hotels to asteroid mining. However, this is not a rose-tinted spectacles venture - from the very first there is an emphasis on the idea that 'space is hard' - it's easy to underestimate the difficulties both of getting out of Earth's gravitational well and surviving in that hostile environment.

The book splits the space business experience into suborbital ventures, getting satellites into orbit, space vacations, extraterrestrial industries and the billionaire space race. May makes it clear that the limiting factor on some of these activities - asteroid mining, for example - is likely to be the need for a huge upfront investment of time and money. 'The question is,' he asks, 'where are we going to find someone far-sighted enough – or naïve enough – to pick up the tab?' Enter those billionaires. 

At the time of writing there has been criticism both from the press and British royals (who ought to know better than to mention the matter of unnecessary expense) of the space ventures of tech billionaires - but that's potentially a shortsighted view. May looks at the drivers behind their different approaches, and highlights why Mars (despite its romantic appeal) is probably less realistic as a prospect for long-term human habitation than space habitats. In the end, though, he comes back to the importance of the space business for everything from navigation to monitoring the climate through that less romantic, but most significant aspect of satellite launching.

It's timely that this book has come out just when the 90-year-old William Shatner - the actor who brought Star Trek's Captain Kirk to life - has made a brief venture into space on a commercial spaceflight. There is something of the essence of Hollywood fakery about these flights that scrape the edge of space but don't really do anything. And yet there is also a feeling of opportunity in space now that hasn't existed since the days of the Apollo missions. 

This is a solid, straightforward guide to the prospects for commercial space activity from satellite launching to asteroid mining. The book makes it clear that if and when we do boldly go where no one has gone before, it is as likely to be on a commercial mission as one that is run by a government.

Hardback: 
Bookshop.org

  

Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

God: the Science, the Evidence - Michel-Yves Bolloré and Olivier Bonnassies ***

This is, to say the least, an oddity, but a fascinating one. A translation of a French bestseller, it aims to put forward an examination of the scientific evidence for the existence of a deity… and various other things, as this is a very oddly structured book (more on that in a moment). In The God Delusion , Richard Dawkins suggested that we should treat the existence of God as a scientific claim, which is exactly what the authors do reasonably well in the main part of the book. They argue that three pieces of scientific evidence in particular are supportive of the existence of a (generic) creator of the universe. These are that the universe had a beginning, the fine tuning of natural constants and the unlikeliness of life.  To support their evidence, Bolloré and Bonnassies give a reasonable introduction to thermodynamics and cosmology. They suggest that the expected heat death of the universe implies a beginning (for good thermodynamic reasons), and rightly give the impression tha...

The Infinite Alphabet - Cesar Hidalgo ****

Although taking a very new approach, this book by a physicist working in economics made me nostalgic for the business books of the 1980s. More on why in a moment, but Cesar Hidalgo sets out to explain how it is knowledge - how it is developed, how it is managed and forgotten - that makes the difference between success and failure. When I worked for a corporate in the 1980s I was very taken with Tom Peters' business books such of In Search of Excellence (with Robert Waterman), which described what made it possible for some companies to thrive and become huge while others failed. (It's interesting to look back to see a balance amongst the companies Peters thought were excellent, with successes such as Walmart and Intel, and failures such as Wang and Kodak.) In a similar way, Hidalgo uses case studies of successes and failures for both businesses and countries in making effective use of knowledge to drive economic success. When I read a Tom Peters book I was inspired and fired up...

The War on Science - Lawrence Krauss (Ed.) ****

At first glance this might appear to be yet another book on how to deal with climate change deniers and the like, such as How to Talk to a Science Denier.   It is, however, a much more significant book because it addresses the way that universities, government and pressure groups have attempted to undermine the scientific process. Conceptually I would give it five stars, but it's quite heavy going because it's a collection of around 18 essays by different academics, with many going over the same ground, so there is a lot of repetition. Even so, it's an important book. There are a few well-known names here - editor Lawrence Krauss, Richard Dawkins and Steven Pinker - but also a range of scientists (with a few philosophers) explaining how science is being damaged in academia by unscientific ideas. Many of the issues apply to other disciplines as well, but this is specifically about the impact on science, and particularly important there because of the damage it has been doing...