Skip to main content

Make Shift (SF) - Gideon Lichfield (Ed.) ***

MIT Press has published a series of collections of science fiction short stories, each with a particular message in mind, often around the impact of new technologies on some aspect of society. So, for example, a recent addition, Entanglements, looked at the impact on relationships and families of emerging technologies. The series is known as 'Twelve Tomorrows', though in the case of Make Shift there are only 10 stories. This is a rapidly assembled collection where the focus is being post-pandemic: the idea was to be positive and show how science and technology could create a fairer, more hopeful world in the aftermath of what many stories assume will be a whole series of pandemics, starting with Covid-19.

There is always a big danger with fiction-with-a-message that the earnestness of the message will get in the way of the storytelling, and that's certainly the case in a number of stories here. In general with these collections there a couple of standouts and a couple of flops, with the rest occupying a middle ground of stories. Perhaps because this collection was put together quickly, it feels rather less effective than previous entries in the series - not helped by a rather strange idea of positiveness, as I found many of the stories quite depressing.

For me the standout here was The Price of Attention by Canadian author Karl Schroeder, featuring a police consultant on the autism spectrum who uses special glasses to manage his focus. It was clever, entertaining and had a sense of drama. There was one oddity - it featured a US where a new voting system allowed people to vote multiple times if they paid for the privilege which seemed both poorly thought through (it was supposed to reflect the importance people put on the issue, but the pricing was absolute, not based on the voter's personal worth) and highly unlikely ever to be passed into law. However, this didn't get in the way of a story with drive and purpose. It perhaps wasn't a coincidence that the post-pandemic aspect was almost incidental - the story would have worked just as well without it.

In too many of the stories, nothing much really happened. They were just a vehicle for describing a new technology and how it would work post (or during) pandemics. A typical example was the opener, Little Kowloon, in which British writer Adrian Hon portrays an attempt to put on an Edinburgh Festival show using new technology to get round the issues of social distancing. There just wasn't enough of a story there to care much about it. 

As with previous collections in this series, there were a couple of stories I had to give up part way through as it was just too much hard work to carry on with no reward for the reader - the message simply pushed storytelling out of the way so much that it wasn't worth the effort.

Not the best addition to MIT's series, then, but as with all these collections there will almost certainly be some stories here that do appeal, so worth seeking a copy out from a library.

Paperback: 
Bookshop.org

  

Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

David Spiegelhalter Five Way interview

Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter FRS OBE is Emeritus Professor of Statistics in the Centre for Mathematical Sciences at the University of Cambridge. He was previously Chair of the Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication and has presented the BBC4 documentaries Tails you Win: the Science of Chance, the award-winning Climate Change by Numbers. His bestselling book, The Art of Statistics , was published in March 2019. He was knighted in 2014 for services to medical statistics, was President of the Royal Statistical Society (2017-2018), and became a Non-Executive Director of the UK Statistics Authority in 2020. His latest book is The Art of Uncertainty . Why probability? because I have been fascinated by the idea of probability, and what it might be, for over 50 years. Why is the ‘P’ word missing from the title? That's a good question.  Partly so as not to make it sound like a technical book, but also because I did not want to give the impression that it was yet another book

The Genetic Book of the Dead: Richard Dawkins ****

When someone came up with the title for this book they were probably thinking deep cultural echoes - I suspect I'm not the only Robert Rankin fan in whom it raised a smile instead, thinking of The Suburban Book of the Dead . That aside, this is a glossy and engaging book showing how physical makeup (phenotype), behaviour and more tell us about the past, with the messenger being (inevitably, this being Richard Dawkins) the genes. Worthy of comment straight away are the illustrations - this is one of the best illustrated science books I've ever come across. Generally illustrations are either an afterthought, or the book is heavily illustrated and the text is really just an accompaniment to the pictures. Here the full colour images tie in directly to the text. They are not asides, but are 'read' with the text by placing them strategically so the picture is directly with the text that refers to it. Many are photographs, though some are effective paintings by Jana Lenzová. T

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on