Skip to main content

Jamie Mollart - Four Way Interview

Jamie Mollart runs his own advertising company, and has won awards for marketing. He has taught novel writing for Writing East Midlands and is a long standing guest on the influential writers podcast Litopia. Jamie is a member of the Climate Fiction Writers League, a group of global authors raising awareness about climate change through writing. 

His debut novel, The Zoo, was on the Amazon Rising Stars 2015 list and his latest novel is Kings of a Dead World.


Why science fiction?

For me it’s the story first and genre second. My first novel, The Zoo, was speculative fiction in a modern day setting because that was what the story called for. For Kings of a Dead World I wanted to explore ideas around the projected results of the self-destructive trajectory the human race is on, so it had to be set in the future. I also had to build a world structure that allowed me to play out the narrative and it wouldn’t have been possible to do that in a modern day setting. 

Science Fiction is a genre that has always been about big ideas. I love J. G. Ballard: he had this incredible ability to take a really strong single concept or idea and then explore it across a really thrilling narrative. He was the master of high concept and you can pretty much distill his books down into a single sentence and that’s unbelievably difficult to achieve. For example,  Concrete Island : a man crashes into a roundabout and finds a whole alternative society stuck there. 

Sci-fi also gives you this ability to discuss current societal concerns at an arm's length distance and that’s invaluable when you’re tackling something as unfathomable as climate change. More than anything though, it’s simply a genre that I’ve always enjoyed reading and so really wanted to write in it too.

Why this book?

Reading it in 2021, you could easily be forgiven for thinking it’s a response to the pandemic, but it’s not. I began working on it 5 years ago and it’s born from a set of personal fears and preoccupations. 

I work in advertising and have a concern that my industry is directly responsible for the rampant consumerism that is the root cause of our gallop towards climate disaster. I struggle personally to reconcile this and wanted to work through it. 

It also explores the idea of culpability, both on a personal level and a societal level, and the impact the individual can have on the collective whole. I wanted to build a world where it was possible for there to be no checks and balances, and then to see what people are capable of within that situation.

When I conceived of The Sleep it seemed as the most extreme possible way humanity could try to solve the problem in a dispassionately logical way - I was actually worried it would be too far fetched, but editing the book through 2020, when it seemed eerily prescient, I wondered whether I could have actually gone further.

What’s next?

A recurring theme in all of my work is toxic masculinity and the male friendship, so I’m going to tackle that head on. It’s a bit of a heady mix at the moment, encompassing the rise of the English nationalism in the run up to Brexit, the patriarchy, male tribalism and more. I'm hoping I can pull it all together into a coherent narrative! 

I’m a bit superstitious about books when they’re being written, so I don’t want to go into too much detail here.

There’s quite a lot bubbling away in my head at the moment at various stages including; a horror book; another sci-fi novel; and even a YA historical novel.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

I’ve a to-read list that’s about 5 feet off the floor at the moment, there seems to be so many good books coming out. I’m reading Who They Was by Gabriel Krauze at the moment and it’s incredible. It’s hard to talk about it without sounding like a newspaper headline, but it’s seriously intense and powerful writing. I’m looking forward to starting Aliya Whiteley’s Skyward Inn, Leave The World Behind, by Rumaan Alam, and Hot Stew by Fiona Mozley, but that hardly touches the pile! 

What I’m most excited about though, is that I’m booked into The Clockhouse at Arvon for a 4 day writing retreat at the end of July. It’s the most creatively productive place for me in the world and I normally visit twice a year to work on my latest novel, however Covid has meant I’ve not been for 2 years. I’m really looking forward to being able to spend 4 solid days working on my WIP.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more