Skip to main content

Jamie Mollart - Four Way Interview

Jamie Mollart runs his own advertising company, and has won awards for marketing. He has taught novel writing for Writing East Midlands and is a long standing guest on the influential writers podcast Litopia. Jamie is a member of the Climate Fiction Writers League, a group of global authors raising awareness about climate change through writing. 

His debut novel, The Zoo, was on the Amazon Rising Stars 2015 list and his latest novel is Kings of a Dead World.


Why science fiction?

For me it’s the story first and genre second. My first novel, The Zoo, was speculative fiction in a modern day setting because that was what the story called for. For Kings of a Dead World I wanted to explore ideas around the projected results of the self-destructive trajectory the human race is on, so it had to be set in the future. I also had to build a world structure that allowed me to play out the narrative and it wouldn’t have been possible to do that in a modern day setting. 

Science Fiction is a genre that has always been about big ideas. I love J. G. Ballard: he had this incredible ability to take a really strong single concept or idea and then explore it across a really thrilling narrative. He was the master of high concept and you can pretty much distill his books down into a single sentence and that’s unbelievably difficult to achieve. For example,  Concrete Island : a man crashes into a roundabout and finds a whole alternative society stuck there. 

Sci-fi also gives you this ability to discuss current societal concerns at an arm's length distance and that’s invaluable when you’re tackling something as unfathomable as climate change. More than anything though, it’s simply a genre that I’ve always enjoyed reading and so really wanted to write in it too.

Why this book?

Reading it in 2021, you could easily be forgiven for thinking it’s a response to the pandemic, but it’s not. I began working on it 5 years ago and it’s born from a set of personal fears and preoccupations. 

I work in advertising and have a concern that my industry is directly responsible for the rampant consumerism that is the root cause of our gallop towards climate disaster. I struggle personally to reconcile this and wanted to work through it. 

It also explores the idea of culpability, both on a personal level and a societal level, and the impact the individual can have on the collective whole. I wanted to build a world where it was possible for there to be no checks and balances, and then to see what people are capable of within that situation.

When I conceived of The Sleep it seemed as the most extreme possible way humanity could try to solve the problem in a dispassionately logical way - I was actually worried it would be too far fetched, but editing the book through 2020, when it seemed eerily prescient, I wondered whether I could have actually gone further.

What’s next?

A recurring theme in all of my work is toxic masculinity and the male friendship, so I’m going to tackle that head on. It’s a bit of a heady mix at the moment, encompassing the rise of the English nationalism in the run up to Brexit, the patriarchy, male tribalism and more. I'm hoping I can pull it all together into a coherent narrative! 

I’m a bit superstitious about books when they’re being written, so I don’t want to go into too much detail here.

There’s quite a lot bubbling away in my head at the moment at various stages including; a horror book; another sci-fi novel; and even a YA historical novel.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

I’ve a to-read list that’s about 5 feet off the floor at the moment, there seems to be so many good books coming out. I’m reading Who They Was by Gabriel Krauze at the moment and it’s incredible. It’s hard to talk about it without sounding like a newspaper headline, but it’s seriously intense and powerful writing. I’m looking forward to starting Aliya Whiteley’s Skyward Inn, Leave The World Behind, by Rumaan Alam, and Hot Stew by Fiona Mozley, but that hardly touches the pile! 

What I’m most excited about though, is that I’m booked into The Clockhouse at Arvon for a 4 day writing retreat at the end of July. It’s the most creatively productive place for me in the world and I normally visit twice a year to work on my latest novel, however Covid has meant I’ve not been for 2 years. I’m really looking forward to being able to spend 4 solid days working on my WIP.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Genetic Book of the Dead: Richard Dawkins ****

When someone came up with the title for this book they were probably thinking deep cultural echoes - I suspect I'm not the only Robert Rankin fan in whom it raised a smile instead, thinking of The Suburban Book of the Dead . That aside, this is a glossy and engaging book showing how physical makeup (phenotype), behaviour and more tell us about the past, with the messenger being (inevitably, this being Richard Dawkins) the genes. Worthy of comment straight away are the illustrations - this is one of the best illustrated science books I've ever come across. Generally illustrations are either an afterthought, or the book is heavily illustrated and the text is really just an accompaniment to the pictures. Here the full colour images tie in directly to the text. They are not asides, but are 'read' with the text by placing them strategically so the picture is directly with the text that refers to it. Many are photographs, though some are effective paintings by Jana Lenzová. T

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on

David Spiegelhalter Five Way interview

Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter FRS OBE is Emeritus Professor of Statistics in the Centre for Mathematical Sciences at the University of Cambridge. He was previously Chair of the Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication and has presented the BBC4 documentaries Tails you Win: the Science of Chance, the award-winning Climate Change by Numbers. His bestselling book, The Art of Statistics , was published in March 2019. He was knighted in 2014 for services to medical statistics, was President of the Royal Statistical Society (2017-2018), and became a Non-Executive Director of the UK Statistics Authority in 2020. His latest book is The Art of Uncertainty . Why probability? because I have been fascinated by the idea of probability, and what it might be, for over 50 years. Why is the ‘P’ word missing from the title? That's a good question.  Partly so as not to make it sound like a technical book, but also because I did not want to give the impression that it was yet another book