Skip to main content

The Mountain in the Sea (SF) - Ray Nayler ****

I'm giving this book four stars despite some irritations, because it's engaging and does inspire some thought about the nature of consciousness, though I think it could have been better as a science fiction novel.

As has become something of a clichéd structure, Ray Nayler switches between three narratives that initially seem unconnected but eventually come together. The central one involves marine biologist Dr Ha Nguyen, who arrives on the Con Dao archipelago, which has been bought by a corporation that evacuated the inhabitants, apparently to make it a wildlife reserve. The only other people present are a military specialist, who defends the location against attacks, and an AI-driven android. Ha is there to observe the local octopuses - but nothing is quite what it seems.

In the other two threads, a robotic trawler is manned by slave labour to process the fish it catches, and an AI specialist is attempting a particularly difficult exploration of a neural network. As the plot draws together, we flip between periods of philosophical discussion and action sequences, usually involving deaths. As mentioned above, there is plenty of consideration of the nature of consciousness, both from observation of the octopuses, which seem to have developed symbolic language and of various AI constructs - and this is where Ray Nayler succeeds in making this an intriguing read (though I wouldn't describe it as a thriller, as one of the quotes on the jacket does).

The negative aspects start with what sounds like a niggle, but proved a real pain. Because the central character's name is Ha, we get sentences starts such as 'Ha heard the insect cacophony from the jungle...' - and every time I read that as 'He', wondered for a moment who this new male character was and then realised. From the science viewpoint, the ability of the AI specialist to explore neural networks was more a matter of magic than programming skills. And having just read Stephen Baxter's Time with its chromophore talking squids, having chromophore talking octopuses brought on a feeling of déjà vu. It didn't help that I'd also recently read Nicholas Humprey's Sentience, which provides real scientific doubts on the validity of cephalopods being sentient.

Not only am I a little fed up of multiple-threaded narratives, although the automated trawler with its rebelling slaves was visceral in its impact, it added very little to the overall thrust of the book - whenever we were on the ship, I just wanted to get back to the rest. And perhaps most irritating of all, each chapter began with an extract from either a book by Ha or by the scientist behind both the android and the corporation that took over the archipelago. These were heavy handedly portentous, sometimes verging on the kind of parody pompous language you'd find in Private Eye. In the end I stopped reading them.

Some issues, definitely for me - though I accept that they might not worry others - but I'm still glad I read it because of the opportunity to think a little more about what it is to be a sentient being.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more