Skip to main content

Theodore Savage (SF) - Cicely Hamilton **

The MIT Press's 'Radium Age' series is based on the premise that between the scientific romances of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century and the 'golden age' of science fiction starting in the mid-thirties, there was an intermediate period of proto-science fiction that has been largely ignored. I'm not convinced this is a meaningful split - something like H. G. Wells's The War of the Worlds may have been labelled as scientific romance because the SF term hadn't been devised yet, but it is pure science fiction already - and still very readable today.

The Radium Age books to date have either been interesting as novels or, if not, notable for doing something special that gives them a place in science fiction history. So even though, for instance, Wells's novel The World Set Free from 1914 is hard going, it is nonetheless interesting because of its introduction of the concept of atomic bombs. Unfortunately, Cicely Hamilton's 1922 novel Theodore Savage is both deadly dull and not particularly innovative - nor has it even got much science fiction content.

It's notable that in Hamilton's Wikipedia entry (her surname was actually Hammill - Hamilton was a pseudonym) this book only gets a passing mention: her main claim to fame was as a writer of dramas with a women's suffrage theme. The only science fiction-like aspect of this book is that it is set in the future, though it's a very unimaginative future that hardly differs from 1922, apart from a couple of vaguely described weapons. Written just after the First World War, it features a subsequent war that destroys civilisation.

Hamilton portrays a miserable future, but probably one she felt was appropriate as she seems to consider the human race inherently evil and incapable of altruism. Very quickly after Britain becomes involved in this new world war, it is totally devastated. It appears that Hamilton had little idea of the scale of a country compared with an attack by air - the whole of civilisation disappears in days. Within a couple of years, no one is living in houses anymore: somehow, the buildings, even in country areas are already falling apart. Before long, any suggestion of science and technology is regarded as evil in a kind introverted equivalent to Walter M. Miller's wonderful 1959 novel A Canticle for Leibowitz, where the remnants of technology are venerated though not understood.

It has been suggested that the women in the book represent Hamilton's views of the way women were suppressed in her era - possibly, though it certainly wouldn't pass the Bechdel test, as all female characters are portrayed through their relationship with men. What comes through far more strongly is the author's distaste for the lower classes, typical of Hamilton's upper middle class at this time - particularly in the portrayal of Ada, whose strangulated cockney rendering of English is worthy of Dick van Dyke's in Mary Poppins, and whose selfish, brainless attitude is in contrast to the titular Theodore Savage's gradually decaying middle class demeanour. 

Occasionally the book livens up, but a lot of the time it is dire. It might be true that 'show, don't tell' is a commandment that needs to be broken sometimes - but there is far too much descriptive and ponderous text, with page after page dedicated to characters' thoughts and to working through moral and spiritual considerations. The only possible reason this book might be considered worthy of inclusion in such a series is because it was one of the first novels after the First World War where the author believed that conflict was a precursor to the end of civilisation - but surely there were more worthy books than this.

Paperback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

David Spiegelhalter Five Way interview

Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter FRS OBE is Emeritus Professor of Statistics in the Centre for Mathematical Sciences at the University of Cambridge. He was previously Chair of the Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication and has presented the BBC4 documentaries Tails you Win: the Science of Chance, the award-winning Climate Change by Numbers. His bestselling book, The Art of Statistics , was published in March 2019. He was knighted in 2014 for services to medical statistics, was President of the Royal Statistical Society (2017-2018), and became a Non-Executive Director of the UK Statistics Authority in 2020. His latest book is The Art of Uncertainty . Why probability? because I have been fascinated by the idea of probability, and what it might be, for over 50 years. Why is the ‘P’ word missing from the title? That's a good question.  Partly so as not to make it sound like a technical book, but also because I did not want to give the impression that it was yet another book

The Genetic Book of the Dead: Richard Dawkins ****

When someone came up with the title for this book they were probably thinking deep cultural echoes - I suspect I'm not the only Robert Rankin fan in whom it raised a smile instead, thinking of The Suburban Book of the Dead . That aside, this is a glossy and engaging book showing how physical makeup (phenotype), behaviour and more tell us about the past, with the messenger being (inevitably, this being Richard Dawkins) the genes. Worthy of comment straight away are the illustrations - this is one of the best illustrated science books I've ever come across. Generally illustrations are either an afterthought, or the book is heavily illustrated and the text is really just an accompaniment to the pictures. Here the full colour images tie in directly to the text. They are not asides, but are 'read' with the text by placing them strategically so the picture is directly with the text that refers to it. Many are photographs, though some are effective paintings by Jana Lenzová. T

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on