Skip to main content

Theodore Savage (SF) - Cicely Hamilton **

The MIT Press's 'Radium Age' series is based on the premise that between the scientific romances of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century and the 'golden age' of science fiction starting in the mid-thirties, there was an intermediate period of proto-science fiction that has been largely ignored. I'm not convinced this is a meaningful split - something like H. G. Wells's The War of the Worlds may have been labelled as scientific romance because the SF term hadn't been devised yet, but it is pure science fiction already - and still very readable today.

The Radium Age books to date have either been interesting as novels or, if not, notable for doing something special that gives them a place in science fiction history. So even though, for instance, Wells's novel The World Set Free from 1914 is hard going, it is nonetheless interesting because of its introduction of the concept of atomic bombs. Unfortunately, Cicely Hamilton's 1922 novel Theodore Savage is both deadly dull and not particularly innovative - nor has it even got much science fiction content.

It's notable that in Hamilton's Wikipedia entry (her surname was actually Hammill - Hamilton was a pseudonym) this book only gets a passing mention: her main claim to fame was as a writer of dramas with a women's suffrage theme. The only science fiction-like aspect of this book is that it is set in the future, though it's a very unimaginative future that hardly differs from 1922, apart from a couple of vaguely described weapons. Written just after the First World War, it features a subsequent war that destroys civilisation.

Hamilton portrays a miserable future, but probably one she felt was appropriate as she seems to consider the human race inherently evil and incapable of altruism. Very quickly after Britain becomes involved in this new world war, it is totally devastated. It appears that Hamilton had little idea of the scale of a country compared with an attack by air - the whole of civilisation disappears in days. Within a couple of years, no one is living in houses anymore: somehow, the buildings, even in country areas are already falling apart. Before long, any suggestion of science and technology is regarded as evil in a kind introverted equivalent to Walter M. Miller's wonderful 1959 novel A Canticle for Leibowitz, where the remnants of technology are venerated though not understood.

It has been suggested that the women in the book represent Hamilton's views of the way women were suppressed in her era - possibly, though it certainly wouldn't pass the Bechdel test, as all female characters are portrayed through their relationship with men. What comes through far more strongly is the author's distaste for the lower classes, typical of Hamilton's upper middle class at this time - particularly in the portrayal of Ada, whose strangulated cockney rendering of English is worthy of Dick van Dyke's in Mary Poppins, and whose selfish, brainless attitude is in contrast to the titular Theodore Savage's gradually decaying middle class demeanour. 

Occasionally the book livens up, but a lot of the time it is dire. It might be true that 'show, don't tell' is a commandment that needs to be broken sometimes - but there is far too much descriptive and ponderous text, with page after page dedicated to characters' thoughts and to working through moral and spiritual considerations. The only possible reason this book might be considered worthy of inclusion in such a series is because it was one of the first novels after the First World War where the author believed that conflict was a precursor to the end of civilisation - but surely there were more worthy books than this.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more