Skip to main content

The One Thing You Need to Know - Marcus Chown *****

Getting a new Marcus Chown book is like receiving a warm science hug - of all the top rank science writers, he has the most friendly style, making complex science as simple and approachable as possible. Apparently, this book was inspired by planning a talk starting from 'What is the one thing you need to know... the one thing from which everything else follows?' The result is 21 short pieces on science topics ranging from gravity to the Big Bang, via global warming, quantum theory and evolution.

Of course, had Chown only provided us with those 'one thing' entries, we'd have had a collection of inspirational fridge magnet quotes, or at best tweets. (To be fair, what is arguably Chown's least successful book, Tweeting the Universe, did literally comprise a set of tweets about science.) Here, the 'one things' range from the extremely compact, such as 'It contains a lot of mass' for why the Sun is hot and 'Light is uncatchable' for special relativity, to the Standard Model's chunkier 'The complexity of the world stems from the permutations of just three fundamental building blocks glued together with three fundamental forces'. But in practice, each section uses its one thing as a starting point and then opens up the topic, typically over ten pages.

If you are regular popular science reader, a lot of these topics will be covering fairly familiar ground, so perhaps the ideal target of this book is someone who hasn't had much exposure to science beyond school. In each case, Chown packs in a considerable amount of information in those short sections, often bringing in stories of the discovery or development of the science to humanise it and make it more approachable. Chown is at his best in physics/cosmology areas (his background), but comes across well across the board. I was particularly impressed with his Higgs field entry. He gives the most approachable description I've seen of what's meant by gauge invariance and why it's important. And there are plenty of fun factoids along the way - I particularly liked the way he highlights how relatively inefficient the Sun is by telling us 'imagine your stomach and a chunk of the sun's core of the same size and shape as your stomach. Your stomach generates heat at a greater rate!'

There is a downside to keeping things simple that does occasionally peep through. It's possible to simplify so far that what's written is not really giving a clear picture of a theory or phenomenon (or the text might simply miss out a necessary explanation). For example, his 'one thing' for the second law of thermodynamics is 'There are many more ways for things to be disordered than ordered, so if each is equally likely, order will gradually morph into disorder.' But nowhere is that 'if each is equally likely' justified. Similarly he tells us 'The Higgs endows all the fermions with their masses'. Admittedly this is corrected in another section where Chown tells us 'actually, the Higgs field accounts for only 0.5 per cent of your mass' - here the subtlety is what is strictly meant by 'their masses' in that first quote. Also, dark matter as a substance is stated as a fact rather than one possible theory to explain the 'dark matter' phenomenon, a theory that has some real problems at the time of writing.

This kind of mild inaccuracy does wind up some scientists, but it is the price you have to pay if you are to make science extremely approachable. Pretty well all popular science has some over-simplification - and in a book with this kind of target audience, there is bound to be a fair amount.

Overall, then, a brilliant, highly simplified and approachable introduction to some of the biggest topics in science. Probably not a book I'd recommend reading end to end in one go, as I did - ideal, for example, to absorb a couple of sections at a time over a short train journey.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...
Post a Comment
Read more