Skip to main content

The One Thing You Need to Know - Marcus Chown *****

Getting a new Marcus Chown book is like receiving a warm science hug - of all the top rank science writers, he has the most friendly style, making complex science as simple and approachable as possible. Apparently, this book was inspired by planning a talk starting from 'What is the one thing you need to know... the one thing from which everything else follows?' The result is 21 short pieces on science topics ranging from gravity to the Big Bang, via global warming, quantum theory and evolution.

Of course, had Chown only provided us with those 'one thing' entries, we'd have had a collection of inspirational fridge magnet quotes, or at best tweets. (To be fair, what is arguably Chown's least successful book, Tweeting the Universe, did literally comprise a set of tweets about science.) Here, the 'one things' range from the extremely compact, such as 'It contains a lot of mass' for why the Sun is hot and 'Light is uncatchable' for special relativity, to the Standard Model's chunkier 'The complexity of the world stems from the permutations of just three fundamental building blocks glued together with three fundamental forces'. But in practice, each section uses its one thing as a starting point and then opens up the topic, typically over ten pages.

If you are regular popular science reader, a lot of these topics will be covering fairly familiar ground, so perhaps the ideal target of this book is someone who hasn't had much exposure to science beyond school. In each case, Chown packs in a considerable amount of information in those short sections, often bringing in stories of the discovery or development of the science to humanise it and make it more approachable. Chown is at his best in physics/cosmology areas (his background), but comes across well across the board. I was particularly impressed with his Higgs field entry. He gives the most approachable description I've seen of what's meant by gauge invariance and why it's important. And there are plenty of fun factoids along the way - I particularly liked the way he highlights how relatively inefficient the Sun is by telling us 'imagine your stomach and a chunk of the sun's core of the same size and shape as your stomach. Your stomach generates heat at a greater rate!'

There is a downside to keeping things simple that does occasionally peep through. It's possible to simplify so far that what's written is not really giving a clear picture of a theory or phenomenon (or the text might simply miss out a necessary explanation). For example, his 'one thing' for the second law of thermodynamics is 'There are many more ways for things to be disordered than ordered, so if each is equally likely, order will gradually morph into disorder.' But nowhere is that 'if each is equally likely' justified. Similarly he tells us 'The Higgs endows all the fermions with their masses'. Admittedly this is corrected in another section where Chown tells us 'actually, the Higgs field accounts for only 0.5 per cent of your mass' - here the subtlety is what is strictly meant by 'their masses' in that first quote. Also, dark matter as a substance is stated as a fact rather than one possible theory to explain the 'dark matter' phenomenon, a theory that has some real problems at the time of writing.

This kind of mild inaccuracy does wind up some scientists, but it is the price you have to pay if you are to make science extremely approachable. Pretty well all popular science has some over-simplification - and in a book with this kind of target audience, there is bound to be a fair amount.

Overall, then, a brilliant, highly simplified and approachable introduction to some of the biggest topics in science. Probably not a book I'd recommend reading end to end in one go, as I did - ideal, for example, to absorb a couple of sections at a time over a short train journey.

Hardback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Genetic Book of the Dead: Richard Dawkins ****

When someone came up with the title for this book they were probably thinking deep cultural echoes - I suspect I'm not the only Robert Rankin fan in whom it raised a smile instead, thinking of The Suburban Book of the Dead . That aside, this is a glossy and engaging book showing how physical makeup (phenotype), behaviour and more tell us about the past, with the messenger being (inevitably, this being Richard Dawkins) the genes. Worthy of comment straight away are the illustrations - this is one of the best illustrated science books I've ever come across. Generally illustrations are either an afterthought, or the book is heavily illustrated and the text is really just an accompaniment to the pictures. Here the full colour images tie in directly to the text. They are not asides, but are 'read' with the text by placing them strategically so the picture is directly with the text that refers to it. Many are photographs, though some are effective paintings by Jana Lenzová. T

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on

David Spiegelhalter Five Way interview

Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter FRS OBE is Emeritus Professor of Statistics in the Centre for Mathematical Sciences at the University of Cambridge. He was previously Chair of the Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication and has presented the BBC4 documentaries Tails you Win: the Science of Chance, the award-winning Climate Change by Numbers. His bestselling book, The Art of Statistics , was published in March 2019. He was knighted in 2014 for services to medical statistics, was President of the Royal Statistical Society (2017-2018), and became a Non-Executive Director of the UK Statistics Authority in 2020. His latest book is The Art of Uncertainty . Why probability? because I have been fascinated by the idea of probability, and what it might be, for over 50 years. Why is the ‘P’ word missing from the title? That's a good question.  Partly so as not to make it sound like a technical book, but also because I did not want to give the impression that it was yet another book