Skip to main content

The One Thing You Need to Know - Marcus Chown *****

Getting a new Marcus Chown book is like receiving a warm science hug - of all the top rank science writers, he has the most friendly style, making complex science as simple and approachable as possible. Apparently, this book was inspired by planning a talk starting from 'What is the one thing you need to know... the one thing from which everything else follows?' The result is 21 short pieces on science topics ranging from gravity to the Big Bang, via global warming, quantum theory and evolution.

Of course, had Chown only provided us with those 'one thing' entries, we'd have had a collection of inspirational fridge magnet quotes, or at best tweets. (To be fair, what is arguably Chown's least successful book, Tweeting the Universe, did literally comprise a set of tweets about science.) Here, the 'one things' range from the extremely compact, such as 'It contains a lot of mass' for why the Sun is hot and 'Light is uncatchable' for special relativity, to the Standard Model's chunkier 'The complexity of the world stems from the permutations of just three fundamental building blocks glued together with three fundamental forces'. But in practice, each section uses its one thing as a starting point and then opens up the topic, typically over ten pages.

If you are regular popular science reader, a lot of these topics will be covering fairly familiar ground, so perhaps the ideal target of this book is someone who hasn't had much exposure to science beyond school. In each case, Chown packs in a considerable amount of information in those short sections, often bringing in stories of the discovery or development of the science to humanise it and make it more approachable. Chown is at his best in physics/cosmology areas (his background), but comes across well across the board. I was particularly impressed with his Higgs field entry. He gives the most approachable description I've seen of what's meant by gauge invariance and why it's important. And there are plenty of fun factoids along the way - I particularly liked the way he highlights how relatively inefficient the Sun is by telling us 'imagine your stomach and a chunk of the sun's core of the same size and shape as your stomach. Your stomach generates heat at a greater rate!'

There is a downside to keeping things simple that does occasionally peep through. It's possible to simplify so far that what's written is not really giving a clear picture of a theory or phenomenon (or the text might simply miss out a necessary explanation). For example, his 'one thing' for the second law of thermodynamics is 'There are many more ways for things to be disordered than ordered, so if each is equally likely, order will gradually morph into disorder.' But nowhere is that 'if each is equally likely' justified. Similarly he tells us 'The Higgs endows all the fermions with their masses'. Admittedly this is corrected in another section where Chown tells us 'actually, the Higgs field accounts for only 0.5 per cent of your mass' - here the subtlety is what is strictly meant by 'their masses' in that first quote. Also, dark matter as a substance is stated as a fact rather than one possible theory to explain the 'dark matter' phenomenon, a theory that has some real problems at the time of writing.

This kind of mild inaccuracy does wind up some scientists, but it is the price you have to pay if you are to make science extremely approachable. Pretty well all popular science has some over-simplification - and in a book with this kind of target audience, there is bound to be a fair amount.

Overall, then, a brilliant, highly simplified and approachable introduction to some of the biggest topics in science. Probably not a book I'd recommend reading end to end in one go, as I did - ideal, for example, to absorb a couple of sections at a time over a short train journey.

Hardback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...