Skip to main content

Time (SF) - Stephen Baxter ***

It was perhaps a mistake to read this book so soon after Stephen Baxter's 1995 sequel to The Time Machine called The Time Ships. For some reason, Baxter had passed me by until recently, so, impressed by reading his recent The Thousand Earths and World Engines: Destroyer (which confusingly features another version of the same main character is this book), I've been digging back into his earlier work. Time is certainly is a book of ideas - but there are three big problems with this 1999 novel. Despite a totally different setting, it has too many similarities to The Time Ships, it has structural issues and its view of 2010 is bizarre.

Time features time travel, a portal on an asteroid, talking squids in space, the sudden emergence of super-intelligent children, a riff on time travel, alternate histories and universes, and more. You can't fault it for its reach, or all the (admittedly highly speculative) scientific concepts that are brought in. And when Baxter settles down and does a bit of action writing, notably in an attack on the asteroid, things suddenly kick up a gear. This is without doubt an impressive and interesting piece of thoughtful science fiction.

However, lets get onto those problems. Both this and The Time Ships feature time travel, intellects of the far future and alternative realities. Even more so than its predecessor, Time also has an ending with strong echoes of the finale of Blish's Cities in Flight series. That, to be honest, was more a problem from reading the two books one after the other, rather than anything fundamental. Structurally, the book is rambling and could do with a good tightening edit. It spends far too long on plodding through situations. Until the structure suddenly changes for a while near the end, it is broken up into sections from the point of view of different characters, each headed with the characters' names. I suspect it might have been originally framed as first person views from these individuals, because on a couple of occasions the text briefly switches into the first person, suggesting it was missed in a re-write. This all feels a little clumsy. The characterisation is often two-dimensional as well, while the character of Emma, the ex-wife of central character Reid Malenfant, is unbelievable in the way she is willing to go along with decision after decision she doesn't agree with.

Oddest of all, though, is Baxter's vision of 2010. It's worth noting that Baxter was something of a protégé of Arthur C. Clarke, as there are several echoes of 2001, A Space Odyssey here - one consciously and clearly making a direct reference to the film. And like 2001, Time shows us technological advances in its setting that are way too far ahead of what was ever likely. Of course, there was more excuse for the anomalies in 2001 as this came out 33 years before its setting, but Baxter used a date just 11 years in his future, yet introduced technological changes that are often still decades away. It just feels wrong. It's also amusing in retrospect that a major theme in the book is NASA and the US government's attempts to prevent private companies doing space flights (even resorting to military attack) - considering what has happened in the last few years.

It's also worth briefly picking up on the 'squids in space' thing. Baxter suggests that squids are sentient and very intelligent (even more so when their intelligence is enhanced by some technical magic) - this now seems exaggerated, especially if the suggestion in the book Sentience that only warm blooded animals are sentient is true. But the reason the concept is fascinating is in the context of Margaret Atwood's put-down of science fiction that it's limited to 'talking squids in outer space.' I've never found a date for that, so it's not clear if Baxter did this intentionally as a wind-up - if so, it's hilarious.

All in all a fascinating, if deeply flawed, book.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

We Are Eating the Earth - Michael Grunwald *****

If I'm honest, I assumed this would be another 'oh dear, we're horrible people who are terrible to the environment', worthily dull title - so I was surprised to be gripped from early on. The subject of the first chunk of the book is one man, Tim Searchinger's fight to take on the bizarrely unscientific assumption that held sway that making ethanol from corn, or burning wood chips instead of coal, was good for the environment. The problem with this fallacy, which seemed to have taken in the US governments, the EU, the UK and more was the assumption that (apart from carbon emitted in production) using these 'grown' fuels was carbon neutral, because the carbon came out of the air. The trouble is, this totally ignores that using land to grow fuel means either displacing land used to grow food, or displacing land that had trees, grass or other growing stuff on it. The outcome is that when we use 'E10' petrol (with 10% ethanol), or electricity produced by ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Battle of the Big Bang - Niayesh Afshordi and Phil Harper *****

It's popular science Jim, but not as we know it. There have been plenty of popular science books about the big bang and the origins of the universe (including my own Before the Big Bang ) but this is unique. In part this is because it's bang up to date (so to speak), but more so because rather than present the theories in an approachable fashion, the book dives into the (sometimes extremely heated) disputed debates between theoreticians. It's still popular science as there's no maths, but it gives a real insight into the alternative viewpoints and depth of feeling. We begin with a rapid dash through the history of cosmological ideas, passing rapidly through the steady state/big bang debate (though not covering Hoyle's modified steady state that dealt with the 'early universe' issues), then slow down as we get into the various possibilities that would emerge once inflation arrived on the scene (including, of course, the theories that do away with inflation). ...
Post a Comment
Read more