Wormhole (SF) - Keith Brooke and Eric Brown *****

This is a cracker of a book (I did read it over Christmas), combining excellent science fiction with a very cold, cold case murder mystery. Medical doctor Rima Cagnac is suspected of murdering her husband 80 years previously. Soon after the crime, she left on a sublight ship heading to another star in suspended animation - the first manned trip to another star system. Thanks to a distinct MacGuffin, this ship (which has just arrived at Mu Arae) carries the necessary technology to establish a wormhole connection to Earth - technology that has finally become workable after the subsequent 80 years. Cold case detective DI Gordon Kemp is sent through the wormhole to arrest Cagnac, while his boss, DI Danni Bellini looks into the matter back in London.

Keith Brooke and Eric Brown keep the plot bubbling nicely, with impressive twists and turns that ensure things are rarely how they first seemed. Kemp's worn-out character is nicely developed, as are some of those he meets on Mu Arae. It's a really satisfying book with a suitably tense ending.

For me, the Earth-based parts of the story are the best - in fact, arguably the whole thing could have been done without the Mu Arae sections, allowing more opportunity to fill out the Earth of 2189. Don't get me wrong, the Mu Arae bits are good, with an effective attempt at thinking beyond the typical Star Trek style alien lifeforms - but it felt distinctly more far fetched, and there would have been other ways to have a living suspect for a crime committed 80 years before. However, the two parts of the book do both work together, so this isn't a significant problem.

As a fan of both SF and British detective stories, this was an ideal title for me - and is effective from both viewpoints. One of the most enjoyable novels I've read in a while.

Paperback:

Kindle:
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

God: the Science, the Evidence - Michel-Yves Bolloré and Olivier Bonnassies ***

This is, to say the least, an oddity, but a fascinating one. A translation of a French bestseller, it aims to put forward an examination of the scientific evidence for the existence of a deity… and various other things, as this is a very oddly structured book (more on that in a moment). In The God Delusion , Richard Dawkins suggested that we should treat the existence of God as a scientific claim, which is exactly what the authors do reasonably well in the main part of the book. They argue that three pieces of scientific evidence in particular are supportive of the existence of a (generic) creator of the universe. These are that the universe had a beginning, the fine tuning of natural constants and the unlikeliness of life. To support their evidence, Bolloré and Bonnassies give a reasonable introduction to thermodynamics and cosmology. They suggest that the expected heat death of the universe implies a beginning (for good thermodynamic reasons), and rightly give the impression tha...

The Infinite Alphabet - Cesar Hidalgo ****

Although taking a very new approach, this book by a physicist working in economics made me nostalgic for the business books of the 1980s. More on why in a moment, but Cesar Hidalgo sets out to explain how it is knowledge - how it is developed, how it is managed and forgotten - that makes the difference between success and failure. When I worked for a corporate in the 1980s I was very taken with Tom Peters' business books such of In Search of Excellence (with Robert Waterman), which described what made it possible for some companies to thrive and become huge while others failed. (It's interesting to look back to see a balance amongst the companies Peters thought were excellent, with successes such as Walmart and Intel, and failures such as Wang and Kodak.) In a similar way, Hidalgo uses case studies of successes and failures for both businesses and countries in making effective use of knowledge to drive economic success. When I read a Tom Peters book I was inspired and fired up...

The War on Science - Lawrence Krauss (Ed.) ****

At first glance this might appear to be yet another book on how to deal with climate change deniers and the like, such as How to Talk to a Science Denier. It is, however, a much more significant book because it addresses the way that universities, government and pressure groups have attempted to undermine the scientific process. Conceptually I would give it five stars, but it's quite heavy going because it's a collection of around 18 essays by different academics, with many going over the same ground, so there is a lot of repetition. Even so, it's an important book. There are a few well-known names here - editor Lawrence Krauss, Richard Dawkins and Steven Pinker - but also a range of scientists (with a few philosophers) explaining how science is being damaged in academia by unscientific ideas. Many of the issues apply to other disciplines as well, but this is specifically about the impact on science, and particularly important there because of the damage it has been doing...

Search This Blog