James Vincent - Five Way Interview

James Vincent is a senior reporter from the Verge, the Vox Media site devoted to technology and society. He has also written for the London Review of Books, Financial Times, and Wired. He lives in London. His new book is Beyond Measure on the hidden history of measurement.

Why science?

I don't really think I write 'science.' Rather, I hope what I do is an amalgamation of science, history, sociology, and any other narrative or factual ingredients I feel like tossing into the pot. I say this not with the intention of giving myself any special precedence either, it's just that I think it's impossible to write about science without straying into these other categories. The world is an amalgamation: horrifically tangled, dense, and interconnected. Science is the name we give to one of many methods of unpicking the whole.

Why this book?

Because I have that childish instinct to look for the category above the category, like hands grasping a pole, one on top the other, top the other, top the other, until you're grabbing air. Measurement is just one of those meta-categories that defines and shapes a whole lot of intellectual effort and so I found myself drawn. And, more importantly I guess, I knew I'd enjoy writing it — and I did.

How do you feel about random journalistic metrics such as ’three Empire State Buildings’, ’six London buses’ or ‘a Manhattan/Wales in area’?

I love them. They're imaginative and pragmatic: a beautiful combination. I remember reading an article about a satellite being launched on some exploratory mission into the depths of the solar system and the journalist described the probe as 'about the size of a washing machine.' Isn't that perfect? Isn't it beautiful? To imagine your washing machine drifting into space — a little domestic voyager, far from home, working its way through a final spin cycle perhaps. To me, these sorts of random metrics are best enjoyed as unintentional metaphors: transferring the property of one entity onto another. And that means there's poetry in them.

What’s next?

Another book and — I hope — a better one. I always hope to improve. It'll be similarly meta and likely a little more mad.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

This morning I've been listening to Charly Antolini, a Swiss jazz drummer, particularly his album Super Knock Out. The first track, which you can listen to on YouTube here gives you a flavour. I don't know much about jazz, but I love the intensity of focus that listening to Antolini's drumming creates.

Image © Lynn Rothwell

Interview by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a digest free here

Comments

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader. We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard. This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here. We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...

Search This Blog