Skip to main content

Beyond Measure - James Vincent *****

Although not all science is quantitative, most fundamental science is - and measurement is, in effect, the foundation of quantitative science. In this engaging exploration, James Vincent looks into both the historical origins of measurement and the development of standards, including the way that they have changed over the centuries. For those who regard metres and kilograms an evil imposition of the EU, he gives the heretical view that the introduction of the metric system in France was 'the single most significant event in the history of measurement' - and it's hard to imagine any scientist would argue with this.

What's clever about Vincent's approach is that he combines the TV documentary style of visiting places and talking to people (arguably not strictly necessary for the topic, but making it more engaging) with far more depth than a TV show can ever cover. So, for example, to bring us into the early days of measurement in the Nile delta, he starts us off in a car with a professor of Eygyptology from the American University in Cairo, who we discover 'addresses everyone she talks to [on the phone] as "sweetie" or "habibi"' which she explains is not because she's on friendly terms with all these people but because she can't remember anyone's name. This kind of little personal detail that can make a popular science title accessible to readers who don't often dip into a science book.

Vincent goes on to cover topics such as temperature, the metric system, land measurement (the origin of the word geometry), statistics and the place of measurement in modern society. Politics and sociological impact come into this to a, perhaps, surprising extent. I've already hinted at the culture clash between metric and Imperial units - something that has left the UK in a state of weird compromise, while the US outside of science still pretty much ignores metric units (with occasional problematic outcomes). However, from early on Vincent highlights that the scientific need for measurement isn't met with delight by everyone - noting the criticism, for example, of Newton for supposedly ignoring the beauty of nature by only focussing on metrics. This is a claim that has been easily refuted by pointing out that with science we can still appreciate the beauty, but get far more out of what we observe as well... but Vincent shows us other impacts of measurement that (particularly historically) have had negative impact when those measurements were misinterpreted and misused to political ends.

If I'm honest, I'm probably not the ideal target for Vincent's approach, in that I find most TV science documentaries unwatchable because of the journalistic, interview-oriented style - but having said that I can cope with this when there's as much detail underlying it, as Vincent is able to provide. I did, however, almost give up after reading the introduction, which is distinctly stodgy. Reading 'Measurement is the root of all tectonic arts' made me wonder if the book was going to be painfully pretentious - but thankfully, this seems primarily an issue limited to the introduction.

All in all, I can confidently say this is a book that measures up extremely well to expectations.

A quick postscript on the cover - I usually show the UK version of a book here, but for this book I was first contacted by the US publisher several months after the UK publication, hence this being the US cover and quite a late review.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more