Skip to main content

Beyond Measure - James Vincent *****

Although not all science is quantitative, most fundamental science is - and measurement is, in effect, the foundation of quantitative science. In this engaging exploration, James Vincent looks into both the historical origins of measurement and the development of standards, including the way that they have changed over the centuries. For those who regard metres and kilograms an evil imposition of the EU, he gives the heretical view that the introduction of the metric system in France was 'the single most significant event in the history of measurement' - and it's hard to imagine any scientist would argue with this.

What's clever about Vincent's approach is that he combines the TV documentary style of visiting places and talking to people (arguably not strictly necessary for the topic, but making it more engaging) with far more depth than a TV show can ever cover. So, for example, to bring us into the early days of measurement in the Nile delta, he starts us off in a car with a professor of Eygyptology from the American University in Cairo, who we discover 'addresses everyone she talks to [on the phone] as "sweetie" or "habibi"' which she explains is not because she's on friendly terms with all these people but because she can't remember anyone's name. This kind of little personal detail that can make a popular science title accessible to readers who don't often dip into a science book.

Vincent goes on to cover topics such as temperature, the metric system, land measurement (the origin of the word geometry), statistics and the place of measurement in modern society. Politics and sociological impact come into this to a, perhaps, surprising extent. I've already hinted at the culture clash between metric and Imperial units - something that has left the UK in a state of weird compromise, while the US outside of science still pretty much ignores metric units (with occasional problematic outcomes). However, from early on Vincent highlights that the scientific need for measurement isn't met with delight by everyone - noting the criticism, for example, of Newton for supposedly ignoring the beauty of nature by only focussing on metrics. This is a claim that has been easily refuted by pointing out that with science we can still appreciate the beauty, but get far more out of what we observe as well... but Vincent shows us other impacts of measurement that (particularly historically) have had negative impact when those measurements were misinterpreted and misused to political ends.

If I'm honest, I'm probably not the ideal target for Vincent's approach, in that I find most TV science documentaries unwatchable because of the journalistic, interview-oriented style - but having said that I can cope with this when there's as much detail underlying it, as Vincent is able to provide. I did, however, almost give up after reading the introduction, which is distinctly stodgy. Reading 'Measurement is the root of all tectonic arts' made me wonder if the book was going to be painfully pretentious - but thankfully, this seems primarily an issue limited to the introduction.

All in all, I can confidently say this is a book that measures up extremely well to expectations.

A quick postscript on the cover - I usually show the UK version of a book here, but for this book I was first contacted by the US publisher several months after the UK publication, hence this being the US cover and quite a late review.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Roger Highfield - Stephen Hawking: genius at work interview

Roger Highfield OBE is the Science Director of the Science Museum Group. Roger has visiting professorships at the Department of Chemistry, UCL, and at the Dunn School, University of Oxford, is a Fellow of the Academy of Medical Sciences, and a member of the Medical Research Council and Longitude Committee. He has written or co-authored ten popular science books, including two bestsellers. His latest title is Stephen Hawking: genius at work . Why science? There are three answers to this question, depending on context: Apollo; Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, along with the world’s worst nuclear accident at Chernobyl; and, finally, Nullius in verba . Growing up I enjoyed the sciencey side of TV programmes like Thunderbirds and The Avengers but became completely besotted when, in short trousers, I gazed up at the moon knowing that two astronauts had paid it a visit. As the Apollo programme unfolded, I became utterly obsessed. Today, more than half a century later, the moon landings are
Post a Comment
Read more

Space Oddities - Harry Cliff *****

In this delightfully readable book, Harry Cliff takes us into the anomalies that are starting to make areas of physics seems to be nearing a paradigm shift, just as occurred in the past with relativity and quantum theory. We start with, we are introduced to some past anomalies linked to changes in viewpoint, such as the precession of Mercury (explained by general relativity, though originally blamed on an undiscovered planet near the Sun), and then move on to a few examples of apparent discoveries being wrong: the BICEP2 evidence for inflation (where the result was caused by dust, not the polarisation being studied),  the disappearance of an interesting blip in LHC results, and an apparent mistake in the manipulation of numbers that resulted in alleged discovery of dark matter particles. These are used to explain how statistics plays a part, and the significance of sigmas . We go on to explore a range of anomalies in particle physics and cosmology that may indicate either a breakdown i
Post a Comment
Read more

Splinters of Infinity - Mark Wolverton ****

Many of us who read popular science regularly will be aware of the 'great debate' between American astronomers Harlow Shapley and Heber Curtis in 1920 over whether the universe was a single galaxy or many. Less familiar is the clash in the 1930s between American Nobel Prize winners Robert Millikan and Arthur Compton over the nature of cosmic rays. This not a book about the nature of cosmic rays as we now understand them, but rather explores this confrontation between heavyweight scientists. Millikan was the first in the fray, and often wrongly named in the press as discoverer of cosmic rays. He believed that this high energy radiation from above was made up of photons that ionised atoms in the atmosphere. One of the reasons he was determined that they should be photons was that this fitted with his thesis that the universe was in a constant state of creation: these photons, he thought, were produced in the birth of new atoms. This view seems to have been primarily driven by re
Post a Comment
Read more