Skip to main content

The Fate of the World - Bill McGuire *****

The science behind climate change has been well covered, including in Bill McGuire's own Hothouse Earth, but I've not before seen a book that doesn't just use model predictions, but looks back at what we know about the state of the climate in different periods of the past, and what caused it, to help get a feel for the reality of the impact likely occur from various levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

McGuire starts with an exploration of solar variation - something that climate change deniers frequently bring up as an alternative explanation for global warming - pointing out that it definitely has an effect, but that's irrelevant to the clear and massive impact of our greenhouse gas emissions. He then takes us through various aspects of past climate variation, from ice ages to huge sea level rises, with a clear warning on the ease with which the climate can undergo relatively sudden changes when a tipping point is reached.

Along the way, McGuire is dismissive of attempts to mitigate climate change - while I agree that their impact is insufficient to allow us to carry on the way we are, it surely is still a good idea, for example, to go ahead with direct air capture, planting trees and so on. But fundamentally he emphasises our biggest hope is to cut back on fossil fuel use as fast as possible - and at the moment our governments simply don't make that easy enough. (A shame also he doesn't mention that biofuels are even worse than fossil fuels.)

I only have two small issues with the book. One's tiny, but irritating: McGuire refers to 'global heating' rather than 'global warming' - they both mean the same thing, and it feels like posturing to change the words, so it grates every time. It's also the case that there's rather too much detail on the historical events. At times I did skip read a few pages, because I didn't need all that detail on specific events and exactly what happened. The big picture is a brilliant idea that really captured my imagination, but it is possible to lose your audience with too much detail.

The front cover has a quote from Chris Packham that says 'Read it and weep, or read it and win.' Unfortunately, Chris seems not to have read the conclusion. I think a more realistic tag line would be 'Read it and despair, or read it and weep.' In the end, McGuire presents us with three possible outcomes from where we are now. That we don't cut back enough and enter a dire future where life is pretty much impossible to continue within a couple of hundred years, that we cut back fast enough that the impact will only be really bad, or that society collapses and as a result we cut back and things are only really bad. There is no 'win' here.

This is probably one of the most depressing books I've ever read - McGuire convinces me that things are going to be far worse for future generations than most of us imagine. I only hope that at least his portrayal will lead to the second option where we cut back sufficiently that things will only be really bad - but with experience of politics, I somehow doubt it. Even so, the best climate book I've read in ages.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...
Post a Comment
Read more