Skip to main content

The Delicate Art of Brute Force - Paul Nahin ***

Ever since computers became useful tools, mathematicians have had mixed opinions about using the technology to solve mathematical problems. Obviously this is particularly topical when we look at what AI can (and can't) do - but there are plenty of opportunities for the brute force of computing to deal with a tricky mathematical road block, and that's what Paul Nahin sets out to cover here.

I'll say straight up front that I think this book would have been better and would have had a wider audience if it had not made excessive assumptions of what a reader knows. In his introductory chapter, Nahin says 'There is nothing in this book that attentive high school students who have taken an AP-calculus or AP-statistics class will find beyond them. This assumption lets me, for example write (as I do in the first chapter) the symbol X without explanation with the expectation that a reader will instantly recognise it as denoting the binomial coefficient...' (I have written X here to represent a pair of parentheses enclosing the letter n above the letter k.)

I had two problems with this. First, I had to look up what this 'AP' business was about: apparently in the US this is a school programme called 'advanced placement' where they get college-level detail - a bit like doing a further mathematics A-level. The other is that when a student I would have had this level of understanding, but frankly, having not used any of this stuff in decades, it isn't obvious at all. There frankly was no need for this intentional obscurity.

This is never going to make it as a popular maths or computing book - but I do want to praise it for what it really is: a textbook lite on approaching relatively simply described mathematical problems using computer programs. Nahin starts with a fairly abstract problem about whether you can make triangle from certain bits of wood, but then goes on to gives us topics like predicting wi-fi coverage (and the related problem of distributing anti-submarine depth charges that was one of the main reasons the discipline of operational research began in the Second World War), which amounts to the maths of intersecting circles or spheres, electrical resistance circuits, gamma-ray path calculations and more. Often what's involved is the incorporation of randomness (as used in Monte Carlo methods and other simulations) - but the main point is that computers can be extremely useful for when conventional mathematical solutions fail.

As a former operational research analyst, working in a department that was very computer intensive, at at a time when many OR people regarded it as somewhat heretical, I very much liked what was going on here. Nahin does try to inject some historical context, but even so this is, for me, still too much of a practical guide rather than popular mathematics/computing to read and enjoy.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...
Post a Comment
Read more