Skip to main content

Facing Infinity - Jonas Enander ****

There have been plenty of good books on black holes, such as Marcus Chown's A Crack in Everything but it's a subject that will always benefit from a different take, and Jonas Enander manages to bring in some new viewpoints as well as exploring the basics of the concept well.

After a journey into a black hole described (with the observer's inevitable destruction), we jump back to Michell's dark stars, then start to get the theoretical basis from Einstein and Schwarzschild alongside observational work. This starts, interestingly, with supermassive black holes before getting onto the common or garden variety. Enander's writing style is light and conversational - no danger here of being overwhelmed with technicalities. It's good, readable stuff.

In some ways the most interesting part of the book is the final section that addresses the subtitle 'black holes and our place on Earth'. This (admittedly sometimes at quite a stretch) tries to link the study of black holes to something relevant, rather than just interesting. The first part, Pōwehi and the Right to Land would amuse anyone who had to read UK undergraduate essays as it manages to squeeze in that perennial topic found there, colonialism. In a way I wish it didn't use colonialism as the hook, as there's a reasonable discussion to be had here about the siting of big telescopes and such - not that it's much to do with black holes, but I think it would work better without deploying the C word.

Enander then jumps on another bridge between political culture and science in Black Holes and Climate Change. (I'm not denying the importance of climate change, but it's a bit peripheral here.) What the section is really about is how quasar measurements can be used to detect changes in the Earth's rotation and the exact positioning of observatories, reflecting, for instance, continental drift. This is both surprising and fascinating. The final sections are perhaps less impressive, but still manage to bring in other oddities around the periphery of black holes (notably the role of black hole jets in spreading star stuff), Hawking and 'could we be living in a black hole' speculative stuff. 

I only have two small moans. Occasionally the historical content is too summary so it slightly mangles things. When dealing with Michell, as an example, we are told that 'rector' is 'the formal title of a parish priest in the Church of England' - it's really isn't, its more complicated than that - and  we are also told 'at the University of Cambridge he had conducted research into artificial magnets, the movement of earthquakes through the Earth's crust...' - this feels misleadingly as if Cambridge had experimental science as part of the day job in Michell's day. Instead what happened was that while at the University of Cambridge people like Michell (or Newton) did their own thing as well as what they were paid to do - there's a big difference between 'at Cambridge' and 'while at Cambridge'. 

My other small issue is that there is too much narrative tourism for me - bits of the book where we get the author travelling, say, to a telescope to talk to someone without this travel (adding to climate change, incidentally) doing anything for the scientific content. It's rather reminiscent of TV science shows where the presenter is flown to a mountain to stare into space and make a deep comment. I really don't care about Enander's various visits, though I appreciate that others may enjoy them. 

All in all, a genuinely interesting take on this perennially fascinating topic.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...
Post a Comment
Read more