Skip to main content

The Circle (SF) - Dave Eggers ****

This near-future dystopian view of a tech giant taken to the extreme still has the power to bite thirteen years after it was first published, though some flaws are now more obvious. Central character Mae gets a job at the Circle, a sort of Google+Meta+Musk. To begin with all is wonderful, though even early on she gets a shock when she is disciplined for not RSVPing an invitation to something she wasn't interested in, sent simply because her socials said she had once visited a country.

As things get more intense, Mae (who frankly can be a little slow on the uptake) becomes a key figure in the Circle, wearing a streaming camera all day and taking viewers around the campus showing what's happening. The message of the company is no secrets, no lies - with everything in the open the world will be better. This may seem a naive view, but it's interesting that in 2009 the then CEO of Google (referring to the Glass product) said ‘If you have something you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn’t be doing it in the first place.’

Meanwhile a mysterious character called Kalden attempts to persuade Mae to lose faith in the company's plans, especially when it seems likely to take over all voting in the US. To be honest, who Kalden is should be pretty obvious to the reader, as there is someone mentioned regularly through the book we never see. But Mae can't work out who he is despite searching for every possible spelling of Kalden beginning with K. (I don't know why she doesn't try C. It may be a US thing - my dad once came back from Chicago with a name badge reading Kleg.)

Overall, it is an excellent exploration of the dangers of both the narcissistic nature of social media and the excessive intrusion of IT companies into everyday life. One way it's a little dated is that it predates the AI revolution. Clearly the Circle is using AI as it has facial recognition etc. - but customer queries are answered by human beings (Mae's first job there), responding using tweaked boilerplate replies, something that (despite the company's people first ethos) would inevitably have been handed over to AI. And in general there is way too little pushback from ordinary people. Where are the civil liberty organisations? Why when there's a demand that politicians live stream their lives isn't the same demanded of the Circle top management? How can they say there should be no secrets but still expect to defend their intellectual property as they stringently do?

It's also a little frustrating to read. There are no chapters, just section breaks, which makes it hard to break off. It's also very long (my paperback copy is still 491 pages despite being in quite small print). This is mostly because it can be painfully slow - I did occasionally feel 'get on with it' - and Kalden's introduction has way too big gaps in it - if he was taking his message seriously, he would have been talking to Mae every day when she wasn't surveilled. 

It's those faults that drag it down a star. I'm very conscious that rating things is a major part of what happens with the Circle's systems, incidentally. One distinct difference between US and UK culture that this supposedly worldwide corporation seems to miss is that when they fix a customer's problem, they expect their response to be rated, and are upset if it's less than around 95%, using a follow-up to try to push the rating up to 100. I can't imagine ever doing a first rating of more than 80%, and if given a follow-up would drop it to 40. Like the aspects mentioned above, there is not enough cultural pushback. 

However, that doesn't stop this being an excellent novel and still a recommended read (far better than the TV movie).

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond Belief - Helen Pearson *****

Apparently it comes as a surprise to many that medicine was not particularly scientific until the end of the twentieth century (to be honest, it's no surprise to me - we had a GP who used homeopathy in the 90s). Instead it was based on anecdotal guidance - the kind of thing that appeared to work. Evidence-based medicine has since improved the field, trying where possible to base decisions on evidence, ideally based on randomised controlled trials. The first part of Helen Pearson's book covers this well - though I think it's by far the least interesting part of what we discover. Instead what's truly fascinating is the rest of it, looking at a wide range of other fields where evidence was rarely properly used and that are only now starting to dip a toe in the water. These include social policy, policing, conservation, business and education. The main part of the book gives us examples of how bad these areas have been in terms of basing decisions on what's always been ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Random Universe - Andrew Jaffe *****

This is an absolutely fascinating book for anyone interested in the way that science really works, bearing in mind the difficulties of having to base our models and theories on induction. Andrew Jaffe introduces the difficulties we face when trying to take a scientific view because largely we are dependent on induction: predicting the future from what has previously been observed. He explores what probability is, the two key ways of looking at it (frequentist and Bayesian) and how scientists use (or misuse it) to work out the implications of their experiments for hypotheses. This is then expanded into looking at the nature of scientific models and the philosophy of science before heading out to entropy, quantum randomness and attempting to achieve meaningful cosmology with its potential dearth of evidence.  The topic might sound a little dry, but in fact Jaffe does it with good humour and a very readable style. For example, he uses measuring his daughter's height by making marks on...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more