Skip to main content

Neuromancer (SF) - William Gibson *****

Sometimes it's good to revisit the classics - in this case not H. G. Wells or Asimov, say, but the archetypal cyberpunk novel. William Gibson did not invent the genre, but this 1984 contribution is standout. (Interesting side note: Gibson makes use of the term 'matrix' for an immersive virtual reality world, admittedly 8 years after it was used on Dr Who, but well ahead of the movie.)

Even the opening line has a certain fame. There are some such lines that resonate whether for their quality, such as Austen's 'It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife,' or for different reasons with 'It was a dark and stormy night,' made infamous by Edward Bulwer-Lytton and beloved by Snoopy. Neuromancer gives us an opener that immediately establishes that cyberpunk feel: 'The sky above the port was the colour of television, tuned to a dead channel.'

The central character Case is a former super-hacker who lost his ability to plug into the matrix after an attempt to rip off some criminals. Now he has a chance to get back in by taking part in a complex mission, run by a mysterious high roller, and assisted by Molly, effectively an enhanced bodyguard. In the best cyberpunk tradition it is fast, sometimes confusing and dark, with drug misuse, murders and more. The final section particularly is a real page turner.

One thing that's fascinating when reading this now is the technology. Of course Gibson gets things wrong - he uses a lot of brand names, many of which have all-but disappeared. What's particularly striking is that from his early 1980s perspective it looked as if Japanese manufacturers would dominate the personal computing market where in reality it was American companies. A big AI plays a major role in the story - in a sense this is nothing new - we saw intelligent computers in 1950s novels - but because Gibson's orientation is software-based, and he calls them AIs, it feels very modern.

My only real criticism is that the excursions into the matrix are sometimes hard to follow - we're not talking a Snowcrash style metaverse, but something more like the world of Tron, where software interactions are presented as 3D visual interpretations. This is particularly dramatic when Case uses a virus, which appears in the matrix to physically attack its target. But overall it lacks any narrative drive. Having said that there are also examples where there is more of a virtual reality environment, controlled by an AI. Even this, though, does slow the real world plot down. Nonetheless, it is still highly impressive.

It's a book with driving intensity, littered with almost comprehensible jargon you have to pick up as you go along. The aesthetic particularly shaped, for instance, the look of the movie Blade Runner. And it's astonishing to think it was written over 40 years ago.

If you are an SF fan and haven't read it, it's time you did.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Andrew Jaffe - Five way interview

Andrew Jaffe is professor of astrophysics and cosmology at Imperial College, London and director of the Imperial Centre for Inference and Cosmology. His new book is The Random Universe. Why science? I’ve always been interested in science, in particular in  astronomy, astrophysics, and space. One of my earliest memories - back in nursery school in New Jersey, I think - was watching one of the moon launches. I wanted that excitement to be part of my life! I never got to be an astronaut, but I did get to be part of the Planck Satellite team, and was privileged to be able to travel to the ESA Spaceport in French Guiana to watch the launch.  In between, I was lucky enough to have a supportive family, get a good education, and find inspiring teachers, mentors, and collaborators. They helped me model the universe, and helped me learn how to refine those models in the face of experimental and observational evidence. That is, they taught me to be a scientist. Why this book? The Random...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more