Skip to main content

Neuromancer (SF) - William Gibson *****

Sometimes it's good to revisit the classics - in this case not H. G. Wells or Asimov, say, but the archetypal cyberpunk novel. William Gibson did not invent the genre, but this 1984 contribution is standout. (Interesting side note: Gibson makes use of the term 'matrix' for an immersive virtual reality world, admittedly 8 years after it was used on Dr Who, but well ahead of the movie.)

Even the opening line has a certain fame. There are some such lines that resonate whether for their quality, such as Austen's 'It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife,' or for different reasons with 'It was a dark and stormy night,' made infamous by Edward Bulwer-Lytton and beloved by Snoopy. Neuromancer gives us an opener that immediately establishes that cyberpunk feel: 'The sky above the port was the colour of television, tuned to a dead channel.'

The central character Case is a former super-hacker who lost his ability to plug into the matrix after an attempt to rip off some criminals. Now he has a chance to get back in by taking part in a complex mission, run by a mysterious high roller, and assisted by Molly, effectively an enhanced bodyguard. In the best cyberpunk tradition it is fast, sometimes confusing and dark, with drug misuse, murders and more. The final section particularly is a real page turner.

One thing that's fascinating when reading this now is the technology. Of course Gibson gets things wrong - he uses a lot of brand names, many of which have all-but disappeared. What's particularly striking is that from his early 1980s perspective it looked as if Japanese manufacturers would dominate the personal computing market where in reality it was American companies. A big AI plays a major role in the story - in a sense this is nothing new - we saw intelligent computers in 1950s novels - but because Gibson's orientation is software-based, and he calls them AIs, it feels very modern.

My only real criticism is that the excursions into the matrix are sometimes hard to follow - we're not talking a Snowcrash style metaverse, but something more like the world of Tron, where software interactions are presented as 3D visual interpretations. This is particularly dramatic when Case uses a virus, which appears in the matrix to physically attack its target. But overall it lacks any narrative drive. Having said that there are also examples where there is more of a virtual reality environment, controlled by an AI. Even this, though, does slow the real world plot down. Nonetheless, it is still highly impressive.

It's a book with driving intensity, littered with almost comprehensible jargon you have to pick up as you go along. The aesthetic particularly shaped, for instance, the look of the movie Blade Runner. And it's astonishing to think it was written over 40 years ago.

If you are an SF fan and haven't read it, it's time you did.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to Keep a Plane in the Sky - Alex Davies ****

If there's one big gap in the science writing sphere, it's popular engineering (you can quibble over whether engineering is science, but where else would you put popular engineering?). Alex Davies does the field a real service with this insightful introduction to the world of test engineering. The concept is simple. If we build something and sell it, we need to test it to make sure that it won't fail in a way that's dangerous to the consumer. The most obvious example is airliners, which feature at some length, but this applies to everything from cuddly toys to hair straighteners: someone needs to predict what could go wrong and to put the product through its paces to see if it will survive under any reasonable circumstances. When Davies is telling a story of test engineering in action, the book is a delight. He opens with the way that real bears are used to test if bears can get into coolers and trash cans - and the impressive ways these animals can  circumvent human in...
Post a Comment
Read more

On the Equality of All Things - Carlo Rovelli ****

There is a wide gulf between the worldviews of physicists and philosophers. Many physicists present a rather sweetly naive, child-like view of the world, where philosophers bring a distinctly more adult, cynical tone. This being the case, it can be a little worrying when a physicist dips a toe into the philosophical mire. Infamously, in The Grand Design , Stephen Hawking and co-author Leonard Mlodinow told us that philosophy was now dead because science could deal with anything it had previously been needed for. Thankfully, Carlo Rovelli is not trying to do away with philosophy, though it has to be said that when he veers into the topic that physicist's naivety can make it feel like the philosophising of an earnest eighteen-year-old. Take the opening paragraph, which tells us 'electrons and minds, stones and laws, judgements and galaxies do not essentially differ in nature from one another. They are notions that illuminate each other'. I almost expected a Pink Floyd soundtr...
Post a Comment
Read more