Skip to main content

Neuromancer (SF) - William Gibson *****

Sometimes it's good to revisit the classics - in this case not H. G. Wells or Asimov, say, but the archetypal cyberpunk novel. William Gibson did not invent the genre, but this 1984 contribution is standout. (Interesting side note: Gibson makes use of the term 'matrix' for an immersive virtual reality world, admittedly 8 years after it was used on Dr Who, but well ahead of the movie.)

Even the opening line has a certain fame. There are some such lines that resonate whether for their quality, such as Austen's 'It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife,' or for different reasons with 'It was a dark and stormy night,' made infamous by Edward Bulwer-Lytton and beloved by Snoopy. Neuromancer gives us an opener that immediately establishes that cyberpunk feel: 'The sky above the port was the colour of television, tuned to a dead channel.'

The central character Case is a former super-hacker who lost his ability to plug into the matrix after an attempt to rip off some criminals. Now he has a chance to get back in by taking part in a complex mission, run by a mysterious high roller, and assisted by Molly, effectively an enhanced bodyguard. In the best cyberpunk tradition it is fast, sometimes confusing and dark, with drug misuse, murders and more. The final section particularly is a real page turner.

One thing that's fascinating when reading this now is the technology. Of course Gibson gets things wrong - he uses a lot of brand names, many of which have all-but disappeared. What's particularly striking is that from his early 1980s perspective it looked as if Japanese manufacturers would dominate the personal computing market where in reality it was American companies. A big AI plays a major role in the story - in a sense this is nothing new - we saw intelligent computers in 1950s novels - but because Gibson's orientation is software-based, and he calls them AIs, it feels very modern.

My only real criticism is that the excursions into the matrix are sometimes hard to follow - we're not talking a Snowcrash style metaverse, but something more like the world of Tron, where software interactions are presented as 3D visual interpretations. This is particularly dramatic when Case uses a virus, which appears in the matrix to physically attack its target. But overall it lacks any narrative drive. Having said that there are also examples where there is more of a virtual reality environment, controlled by an AI. Even this, though, does slow the real world plot down. Nonetheless, it is still highly impressive.

It's a book with driving intensity, littered with almost comprehensible jargon you have to pick up as you go along. The aesthetic particularly shaped, for instance, the look of the movie Blade Runner. And it's astonishing to think it was written over 40 years ago.

If you are an SF fan and haven't read it, it's time you did.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Who Invented the Computer? – Ian Watson

Ian Watson is the author of  The Universal Machine  and featured in a recent  Four Way Interview . Saturday June 23 2012 was the centenary of the birth of Alan Turing, the troubled genius who invented the modern computer. Why though do so few people recognize his name and his great achievements? In 1936 English mathematician Alan Turing, published a paper,  On Computable Numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem . This became the foundation of computing. In it Turing presented a theoretical machine that could solve any problem that could be described by instructions encoded on a paper tape. A Turing Machine could calculate square roots, whilst another might solve Sudoku puzzles. Turing demonstrated you could construct a single  Universal Machine  that could simulate any Turing Machine. One machine solving any problem for which a program could be written – sound familiar? He’d invented the computer. Then,  computers  were peop...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Star Book – Peter Grego ****

This attractive landscape format book combines an excellent introduction to the stars and basic astronomy with a set of star maps, plus in depth looks at some of the stars featured, with a  bonus section on the solar system. Amazon says it’s a hardback, but in fact it’s a paperback with a rather ingenious cover – you can’t tell from the photo, but the words ‘The Star Book’ are punched through as a series of holes that show the white paper of the next page beneath. Like many astronomy/space books, the cover lacks shelf appeal because it is mostly black, but at least there is some original thought here. Unlike many books in this format which tend to concentrate on the pictures, there is a good deal of excellent text by Peter Grego, so there was no feeling that you were only getting the star maps and star ‘biographies’, something these days much more suited to an iPad or smartphone app. Instead, the opening 30 or so pages give a very good introduction that would be valuable to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ignorance: How it drives science – Stuart Firestein *****

This is a delightful little book that really gets you thinking. I stress the ‘little’ part not as a negative, but as a good thing. There is nothing worse than fat, bloated popular science books where the author feels they have to get 120,000 words to be taken seriously. This is the sort of book that can be read in a couple of hours – but you will get so much more out of it than one of those tedious doorstops. The premise underlying the book is in once sense extremely simple, yet is fundamental to an understanding of what science is and what scientists do. And it is an understanding that is totally at odds with the typical way science is portrayed both in university lectures and popular science books. As Stuart Firestein points out, what is important is not the facts, but rather the area of ignorance. The interesting part and the fundamental heart of science is not about what we know, but about what we don’t know and where we want to look next. Take this lovely quote: ‘Working ...
Post a Comment
Read more