Skip to main content

The Premonitions Bureau - Sam Knight ****

Not everyone would class this as popular science, but it concerns an attempt to take a scientific approach to paranormal abilities - notably premonitions (aka clairvoyance) and as such, it fits the category.

Writing in the typical dramatic storytelling style of a US magazine, Sam Knight brings to life the remarkable tale of the work of two British figures from the 1960s. The central one is psychiatrist John Barker, with a supporting role given to newspaper and TV science reporter Peter Fairley. Barker had a long interest in extra sensory phenomena - the story takes off when he was inspired by a number of people claiming to have foreseen the Aberfan disaster (which terrible tragedy Knight covers movingly).

As a result of the Aberfan premonitions, the pair were responsible for London's Evening Standard newspaper setting up a long-running experiment in the form of 'The Premonitions Bureau.' Aware that the Aberfan predictions were only reported after the event, and hence flawed from the start, the idea was to ask readers to write in with any premonitions they received for the future, and to see if there were any solid predictions, or any convergence where multiple individuals predicted the same disaster.

Barker apparently had the idea that, if successful, this would make it possible to offer such a service for the public good, though this did open up the slightly mind-bending worry for him that if premonitions made it possible to prevent a disaster, how could the premonitions exist in the first place?

Although what's in the book is very reasonable and genuinely fascinating, the frustrating thing is a lack of analysis by Knight. He is a good storyteller, but all too often just tells us what happened without saying if it made any sense. The best example of why this matters is the Bureau's first big 'success', a premonition of a plane crash made in March 1967. The 'seer', a man called Alan Hencher, who had already claimed (after the event) to have predicted Aberfan, described a very detailed dream. A Caravelle jet airliner would crash shortly after takeoff after passing over mountains. About 124 people would be killed.

Knight comments on the similarities of this prediction with the Nicosia plane crash of 20 April 1967, which killed 126 people. This was assumed by Barker to demonstrate the reality of the premonition. But apart from the casualty numbers, there was hardly any correspondence between the prediction and reality. (For that matter, given the size of planes at the time, this was the kind of number you would make up to represent a big tragedy.) Hencher got the aircraft type wrong, and was wrong in saying it was a jet - the plane was a propellor-driven Britannia. The crash wasn't soon after takeoff - the plane had been flying for hours. But the really big problem is that the crash didn't happen until 30 days after the prediction. Lots of people have dreams about plane crashes, and planes were less reliable then. There were at least 14 fatal airliner crashes with significant numbers of deaths in 1967. If they waited long enough, inevitably this prediction would have 'come true' given the level of leeway applied - the whole thing was highly dubious. Yet Knight does not explore this.

Some of the other predictions mentioned are more impressive - though if you are constantly receiving guesses about the future,  statistically some will eventually be close enough to be considered a success. Knight focusses particularly on two big hitters, Hencher and a Miss Middleton, but again fails to explore crucial information, for example: how many predictions they got wrong.

The book is at its best when it is following its main thread of Barker's life. He seems to have hated his job at a crumbling mental asylum, particularly when the authorities were less than enthusiastic about his real passions - the paranormal and an obsession with death that led to his writing a successful book Scared to Death about people who apparently died from purely mental causes. Less effective are parts where Knight breaks up the story with short, often very loosely connected, asides, for example on Ancient Greek philosophers’ ideas about fate, or an obscure French philosopher’s thoughts on death - these feel like padding.

Whether or not you believe paranormal phenomena exist, they are fascinating (the psychology of thinking they're real, and the work of fakers is just as interesting as the concept itself) - I enjoyed researching and writing about these subjects and scientific attempts to study them in a more general way in my book Extra Sensory. With its large, moody, black and white illustrations and excellently written text, Knight tells Barker and Fairley's story extremely well.

Hardback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We Are Eating the Earth - Michael Grunwald *****

If I'm honest, I assumed this would be another 'oh dear, we're horrible people who are terrible to the environment', worthily dull title - so I was surprised to be gripped from early on. The subject of the first chunk of the book is one man, Tim Searchinger's fight to take on the bizarrely unscientific assumption that held sway that making ethanol from corn, or burning wood chips instead of coal, was good for the environment. The problem with this fallacy, which seemed to have taken in the US governments, the EU, the UK and more was the assumption that (apart from carbon emitted in production) using these 'grown' fuels was carbon neutral, because the carbon came out of the air. The trouble is, this totally ignores that using land to grow fuel means either displacing land used to grow food, or displacing land that had trees, grass or other growing stuff on it. The outcome is that when we use 'E10' petrol (with 10% ethanol), or electricity produced by ...

Battle of the Big Bang - Niayesh Afshordi and Phil Harper *****

It's popular science Jim, but not as we know it. There have been plenty of popular science books about the big bang and the origins of the universe (including my own Before the Big Bang ) but this is unique. In part this is because it's bang up to date (so to speak), but more so because rather than present the theories in an approachable fashion, the book dives into the (sometimes extremely heated) disputed debates between theoreticians. It's still popular science as there's no maths, but it gives a real insight into the alternative viewpoints and depth of feeling. We begin with a rapid dash through the history of cosmological ideas, passing rapidly through the steady state/big bang debate (though not covering Hoyle's modified steady state that dealt with the 'early universe' issues), then slow down as we get into the various possibilities that would emerge once inflation arrived on the scene (including, of course, the theories that do away with inflation). ...

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that â€˜Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...