Skip to main content

Bill McGuire - Five Way Interview

Bill McGuire is Professor Emeritus of Geophysical and Climate Hazards at University College London, a co-director of the New Weather Institute and was a contributor to the 2012 IPCC report on climate change and extreme events. His books include A Guide to the End of the World: Everything You Never Wanted to Know and Waking the Giant: How a Changing Climate Triggers Earthquakes, Tsunamis and Volcanoes. His first novel, Skyseed – an eco-thriller about climate engineering gone wrong – was published in 2020. He writes for many publications, including the Guardian, The Times, the Observer, New Scientist, Science Focus and Prospect and is author of the Cool Earth blog on Substack. Bill lives, runs (sometimes) and grows fruit and veg in the wonderful English Peak District, where he resides with his wife Anna, sons Jake and Fraser and cats Dave, Toby and Cashew. His latest book is Hothouse Earth: an Inhabitant's Guide.

Why Science?

They say write about what you know. I am a scientist, so what else would I write about? Thinking back, I have been writing about science since I was 13 years old. At secondary school, I published a magazine called Naturescope, for which I wrote most of the articles, and I haven't really stopped since. While it is always a great feeling to get a paper published in an academic journal, especially a prestigious one like Nature, writing about science for other people has always been more fun and - ultimately - more gratifying.

Why this book?

Hothouse Earth: an Inhabitant's Guide is a book that was just waiting to be written. If I hadn't written it, somebody else would have. Despite politicians droning on about reaching net zero carbon by mid century, and climate scientists talking about how crucial it is that we keep the global average temperature rise (since pre-industrial times) below 1.5°C by 2030, it became very clear - post COP26 in Glasgow - that these goals were either too late, or no longer possible. The reality is that the 45 percent cut in global emissions needed within 90 months to have a chance of staying this side of the 1.5°C dangerous climate change guardrail, is just not going to happen. Emissions continue to climb, and are actually set to be 14 percent or more higher by this time. The corollary of this is that we can no longer sidestep perilous, all-pervasive, climate breakdown, that will affect all of us and intrude into every part of our lives. I think, looking around us at the extreme weather of this year and last, that this will honestly not come as a surprise to many people.

The book is inevitably quite depressing - can you give any glimmers of hope?

Indeed. It is hard not be depressed when we look about us at the way we have trashed - and continue to trash - our world, and rip apart our once stable climate. Glimmers of hope are few and far between, but there is a frisson of anticipation that things are changing - not at the top but at the bottom. World leaders are almost totally in thrall to a political-economic system predicated on greed, profit and short-term gain, and it is impossible to see them throwing this over in order to make a serious attempt to tackle the climate emergency. Fortunately, the youth of the world have a completely different view. They know that they are the ones who will suffer most and understand that if we don't work together for the common good than the only possible outcome will be a climate cataclysm. As war, energy and food crises, and growing poverty and inequality come together - along with accelerating climate breakdown - I sense that we are on the cusp of a revolution that will fundamentally change for the better the way society and economy work, and give us a fighting chance of at least limiting the impact of inevitable climate collapse. The transition may not be pretty, but it is inevitable if we are to have a future worth living. You may say I'm a dreamer, as someone once said, but I can assure you, I am not the only one.

What's next?

I write fiction as well as popular science, and I am planning to focus on this for the next couple of years. My debut novel, Skyseed - an ecothriller about climate engineering gone wrong - was published in Autumn 2020. It was short-listed for the next crop of BBC Radio drama series, but we heard recently that we didn't get the final thumbs-up. Seemingly, this isn't the right time for a hard-hitting drama about the climate!!! All hope is not lost, however, and the book is now being pitched as a television series. Writing-wise, I am working on two Young Adult novels - one set in the distant future, the other on an alternative Earth. As you might expect, both have a strong science element, although I would hesitate to call either science fiction.

What's exciting you at the moment?

I had to think about this for a while. I don't tend to get excited about stuff easily and there is certainly nothing new on the climate breakdown mitigation front that is tickling my fancy. If I am honest, I would probably have to say the work and prospects of my 18-year old son, Fraser. He already writes for a number of publications and has a high profile at national level in youth politics. In a few months he begins a degree in Politics and Modern History at the University of Manchester, with a view to following a political career. Fraser is emblematic of the young people of the UK and countries across the world, who hold the future of our society and our planet in their hands.

Interview by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Roger Highfield - Stephen Hawking: genius at work interview

Roger Highfield OBE is the Science Director of the Science Museum Group. Roger has visiting professorships at the Department of Chemistry, UCL, and at the Dunn School, University of Oxford, is a Fellow of the Academy of Medical Sciences, and a member of the Medical Research Council and Longitude Committee. He has written or co-authored ten popular science books, including two bestsellers. His latest title is Stephen Hawking: genius at work . Why science? There are three answers to this question, depending on context: Apollo; Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, along with the world’s worst nuclear accident at Chernobyl; and, finally, Nullius in verba . Growing up I enjoyed the sciencey side of TV programmes like Thunderbirds and The Avengers but became completely besotted when, in short trousers, I gazed up at the moon knowing that two astronauts had paid it a visit. As the Apollo programme unfolded, I became utterly obsessed. Today, more than half a century later, the moon landings are

Space Oddities - Harry Cliff *****

In this delightfully readable book, Harry Cliff takes us into the anomalies that are starting to make areas of physics seems to be nearing a paradigm shift, just as occurred in the past with relativity and quantum theory. We start with, we are introduced to some past anomalies linked to changes in viewpoint, such as the precession of Mercury (explained by general relativity, though originally blamed on an undiscovered planet near the Sun), and then move on to a few examples of apparent discoveries being wrong: the BICEP2 evidence for inflation (where the result was caused by dust, not the polarisation being studied),  the disappearance of an interesting blip in LHC results, and an apparent mistake in the manipulation of numbers that resulted in alleged discovery of dark matter particles. These are used to explain how statistics plays a part, and the significance of sigmas . We go on to explore a range of anomalies in particle physics and cosmology that may indicate either a breakdown i

Splinters of Infinity - Mark Wolverton ****

Many of us who read popular science regularly will be aware of the 'great debate' between American astronomers Harlow Shapley and Heber Curtis in 1920 over whether the universe was a single galaxy or many. Less familiar is the clash in the 1930s between American Nobel Prize winners Robert Millikan and Arthur Compton over the nature of cosmic rays. This not a book about the nature of cosmic rays as we now understand them, but rather explores this confrontation between heavyweight scientists. Millikan was the first in the fray, and often wrongly named in the press as discoverer of cosmic rays. He believed that this high energy radiation from above was made up of photons that ionised atoms in the atmosphere. One of the reasons he was determined that they should be photons was that this fitted with his thesis that the universe was in a constant state of creation: these photons, he thought, were produced in the birth of new atoms. This view seems to have been primarily driven by re