Skip to main content

Tomorrow's Parties (SF) - Jonathan Strahan (Ed) ****

I've read several of MIT Press's science fiction short story series 'Twelve Tomorrows' (for example, the original Twelve Tomorrows book and Make Shift), and this is probably the best of the lot. 

The stories here are described as featuring 'life in the Anthropocene'. Strictly, this is just the era when humans have had a significant impact on the environment, but has mostly been taken as life following catastrophic climate change. Despite this dystopian context, the idea (hence the 'parties' of the title) was to 'take rational optimism as a moral imperative, or at least a pragmatic alternative to despair.'

I'm not sure that rational optimism is the prevailing emotion, but there are a couple of excellent stories here, plus two more that have superb ideas, despite being heavily flawed. There are probably only two clunkers, one of which was so boring I had to give up on - but that's par for the course in an SF story collection.

The real standouts for me were Daryl Gregory's Once Upon a Future in the West and Saad Z. Hossain's The Ferryman. The first, set in a wildfire-dominated American West beautifully ties together a number of apparently unconnected threads (though I did slightly worried that the writer would be sued by Tom Hanks) and portrays an all too imaginable dystopian future. The Ferryman has a very different setting -  Bangladesh or India - and explores an area of existence that is all too often ignored. It also has a truly surprising ending.

The two stories I mentioned with superb ideas despite flaws in the plots were the first two in the book, Drone Pilates of Silicon Valley by Meg Elison and Down and Out in Exile Park by Tade Thompson. Both have fascinating tech/bio-tech components to the story. The first is beautifully engaging, while the second has a wonderfully imaginative setting. What let both down for me was their naive political stance, broadly along the lines of 'capitalism evil; anarchy is the way forward'. 

At one point, Down and Out had me laughing out loud when Thompson envisages a parliament where any citizen can speak, surely a recipe for drowning in nothing ever being decided - it made me wonder if he's ever actually been to a meeting involving normal people. What's particularly amusing is that we are told 'Competence means you get listened to and your opinion is weighted in your area of expertise.' But how in an anarchist society can you possibly measure expertise? (There's also an inconsistency where we are told 'anybody over sixteen can attend, comment, and vote' but later quotes 'a vocal fifteen-year-old' in the parliament - but then it is anarchy...)

Something I was a bit disappointed by was that there are only ten stories here, some far too long. It would have been good to have had more of a mix of length and a few more stories. That whole 'twelve tomorrows' framework is a bit restrictive anyway, but also it's a shame that two of the slots were wasted with an interview and the somewhat pretentious justification of the artist involved - these could have been ancillary to a full twelve stories.

Overall, though, a suitably imaginative and thought-provoking collection to show why this is such a good idea from MIT Press.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more