Skip to main content

Geology: an illustrated history - David Bainbridge ***

Of all the sciences it's arguable that geology is the hardest to make appealing to the general public. Okay some rocks are pretty, and it's behind impressive landscapes, but it lacks a certain excitement for most. By presenting geology in a highly illustrated form (and stretching its definitions to the limits) David Bainbridge gives it an attractive edge in a coffee table fashion.

The book is divided into five sections: Time, Energy, Process, Use and Life, which gives a feel for the way that Bainbridge expands the content beyond what most of us would think of as pure geology. Apart from introductory text and insert spreads like 'Insights: Periodic Table', the bulk of each section is a series of often impressive images, each with a longish caption. To show just how far Bainbridge takes us from the conventional, the Time chapter, which covers the way geology has changed our view of Earth time, starts its images with four artworks, including a creation image in the 12th century Aberdeen Bestiary, and da Vinci's Madonna of the Rocks. Arguably the connection to the theme is a touch tenuous here, though we do then get onto rather a lot of images of landscapes and strata.

Perhaps the most surprising sections are the last two. Use takes us into the ways we have employed minerals and stone extracted from the Earth, including fossil fuels (with the suitably green if meaningless to the untutored eye 'Illustration from "Assessing the carbon sequestration potential of basalt using X-ray micro-CT and rock mechanics"'). Life argues, perhaps fairly, that palaeontology is so deeply intwined with geology that it belongs in a book like this, giving us the inevitable stream of images of fossils, and rather less expected images of Europa and Enceladus, suggesting their sub-ice oceans are somehow part of geology. (Surely it shouldn't be 'geo'?) Interestingly, Bainbridge has already done a palaeontology version of this book, but I the geology title works better.

One problem I have with highly illustrated books is that they are structurally bitty. There's often no clear flow, and this came across particularly strongly here, where, for instance, the Use chapter can have on opposing pages the English market town of Shrewsbury and Michelangelo's sculpture Awakening Slave. Some may find this scattergun feeling entertaining, but for me it gets in the way of following a narrative.

This is a book with plenty going for it, I'm just not sure in what circumstances I would normally read it, if 'read' is even the right word. One to dip into, perhaps, rather than read cover to cover.

Hardback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond Belief - Helen Pearson *****

Apparently it comes as a surprise to many that medicine was not particularly scientific until the end of the twentieth century (to be honest, it's no surprise to me - we had a GP who used homeopathy in the 90s). Instead it was based on anecdotal guidance - the kind of thing that appeared to work. Evidence-based medicine has since improved the field, trying where possible to base decisions on evidence, ideally based on randomised controlled trials. The first part of Helen Pearson's book covers this well - though I think it's by far the least interesting part of what we discover. Instead what's truly fascinating is the rest of it, looking at a wide range of other fields where evidence was rarely properly used and that are only now starting to dip a toe in the water. These include social policy, policing, conservation, business and education. The main part of the book gives us examples of how bad these areas have been in terms of basing decisions on what's always been ...

The Random Universe - Andrew Jaffe *****

This is an absolutely fascinating book for anyone interested in the way that science really works, bearing in mind the difficulties of having to base our models and theories on induction. Andrew Jaffe introduces the difficulties we face when trying to take a scientific view because largely we are dependent on induction: predicting the future from what has previously been observed. He explores what probability is, the two key ways of looking at it (frequentist and Bayesian) and how scientists use (or misuse it) to work out the implications of their experiments for hypotheses. This is then expanded into looking at the nature of scientific models and the philosophy of science before heading out to entropy, quantum randomness and attempting to achieve meaningful cosmology with its potential dearth of evidence.  The topic might sound a little dry, but in fact Jaffe does it with good humour and a very readable style. For example, he uses measuring his daughter's height by making marks on...

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...