Skip to main content

Becoming Martian - Scott Solomon ****

Until recently there was a huge geeky talking point based on establishing a colony on Mars. Several billionaires took an interest, notably SpaceX's boss, while there was even the suggestion that a Mars colony could be run as a TV show, like an extraterrestrial Big Brother. The wilder speculation has now died down, but the idea of living on Mars still has a strong niche following. 

In Becoming Martian, Scott Solomon gives us an in-depth and engaging look at the difficulties faced in moving to our nearest semi-inhabitable planet, which are considerable. As Solomon points out, the idea of terraforming Mars, giving it a breathable atmosphere and enough greenhouse gasses to warm it up a bit, is simply impractical - even if such a massive effort could be achieved, the combination of relatively low gravity, limited nitrogen and no magnetic field would mean the new atmosphere would be quickly lost again.

This means that would-be Martians will have to protect themselves permanently from radiation, cold and lack of atmosphere. Oh, and the soil is laced with toxic perchlorates. Despite all this, there are people who are still attracted by the idea of moving permanently to Mars. Solomon takes us through the specific difficulties - for example the social issues that have arisen in groups of people shut in isolated environments that attempt to replicate conditions on a space colony on Earth, and the effects of reduced gravity on human bodies - and the more speculative considerations, such as sex and birth in space and on Mars, or whether over generations martian residents would evolve to be a distinctive species.

One significant omission is saying much about the practicalities of getting there. Solomon points out how long it takes, and has a nice chapter on the history of human space travel, but there is nothing really on how you would get significant numbers to Mars safely. Although he doesn't mention it, there has been a long history of Mars probes failing, and the success of a few rovers doesn't give any clue as to what would be required to get survivable human habitation in place. I appreciate the focus of the book is the physical and psychological impact of the exercise, but surely getting there is an essential part of becoming Martian.

We get a nice mix of anecdotes from visits Solomon does, interviews with astronauts and scientific studies all pulled together in a readable fashion. However, when compared with the Weinersmith's A City on Mars, I think Solomon is too optimistic. This was highlighted by a a comment that Mars's natural resources make it 'the most attractive place we know of in our solar system for human habitation.' Solomon does qualify this in an end note that says '...other than Earth, it must be noted' - but it's a very big 'other than'. Despite this, though, it was an enjoyable picture of the current status of this highly speculative concept.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...
Post a Comment
Read more