Ascendants (SF) - Don Schechter ***

The premise here is that around 2035 technology that had been developed to understand aspects of the brain and its medical failings accidentally results in the discovery that people with a certain genetic makeup experience an afterlife, the transition to which others can witness.

The first part of the book gives us a 2060 where everything has fallen apart because of this breakthrough. Hardly anyone believes in religion anymore. There are social clashes between the few 'ascendants' who can have this transition to afterlife and the 'biomass' rest who don't. The institute behind the technology seems to operate in a quasi-governmental way.

We then take a jump back to the origins of the technology and what's really going on. Finally we return to the 2060ish present for a final reckoning. The middle section is by far the best. There is a genuinely engaging look at a startup looking for funding and how and if it should interface with the state - impressively foreshadowing real occurrences with AI.

For the rest, though, the storyline can be quite confused, and lacks characters with whom it's easy to identify. I wasn't at any point gripped or pulled into the flow of the story. And there was a more fundamental issue that the whole premise didn't seem to make sense. As presented in the blurb it seems as if there is definite evidence of an afterlife - rather as if the old spirit mediums had a scientific replacement. But all we're talking about is a vague transcendental experience that could be put down to anything. It's impossible to imagine religions and society collapsing based on little more than an immersive virtual reality experience. I can't go into the twist towards the end of the book without giving too much away - but that too seems highly unlikely.

There's something interesting going on in Ascendants - but unfortunately it seems to have lacked a decent editor to get the author to pull the whole thing apart and restructure it. As a result, it is quite hard work. All science fiction requires suspension of disbelief, but I'm afraid my disbelief spidey-sense was tingling all the way. I did enjoy much of that middle section, though, about life before the main premise kicked in.

Paperback:

Kindle:
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...

Search This Blog