Skip to main content

Flaxman Low: Occult Detective - E. and E. Heron ****

It's an easy assumption (which I made) that this book is fantasy as it involves a ghost hunter, but I'm calling it SF, as at the time of publication at the end of the nineteenth century, the Society for Psychical Research was treating such phenomena as a subject of scientific investigation, and there has been plenty of SF where the 'science' has been anything but correct.

This is part of MIT Press's Radium Age series, which brings back titles from the period when science fiction was just starting to emerge. Often writing from this period was stodgy and no longer easy to read: arguably with little other entertainment available in the home, there was far less need for good writing than is the case now. But short stories of the period can often work better - think how well, for instance, the Sherlock Holmes stories hold up. Although the Herons (in reality mother and son team, the bizarrely named Kate O'Brien Ryall Pritchard and Hesketh Hesketh-Pritchard) aren't up to Conan Doyle's standards, they do a reasonable job of making the work of their hero, Flaxman Low passable.

The stories are suitably gothic - quite often the apparitions are able to physically interact with their surroundings, causing harm or even death. We also get a few more corporeal investigations with some of the horror classics such as mummies and vampires, and even a fungal foe. Flaxman Low is that new contribution to the scientific world, a psychologist, and his role seems mainly to assess in an objective fashion the psychology of the spirit - why it is doing the nasty business it is. The only problem with this approach is that, unlike, say, the puzzles solved by Holmes, Low can rarely offer a solution, merely an explanation, which gives the stories less punch. There is, however, one magnificent piece of advice. A character heads to get a medic. The doctor turns out to be 'a big, powerful Irishman, rather the worse for liquor, but with the deep eye and square jaw that indicates ability.' So next time you are concerned about your medical treatment, just check the eye and jaw of the physician.

I must, say I don't understand why the illustrator seems to have portrayed Low on the cover as something close to a 1920s or 30s German army officer - the style is totally inappropriate for something set (and written) in the 1890s, but I presume it's down to a look the whole series uses. In fact, given radium wasn't isolated until 1910, it's arguable this isn't a radium age set of stories, any more than, say, the H. G. Wells classics like War of the Worlds, The Time Machine or First Men in the Moon could be attributed to that period.

All in all, for someone who enjoys very much the tales of Conan Doyle and his contemporaries, along with the better early science fiction, despite the sometimes lacklustre endings of the stories, I was really glad to have read this contribution to the series. Fun stuff.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond Belief - Helen Pearson *****

Apparently it comes as a surprise to many that medicine was not particularly scientific until the end of the twentieth century (to be honest, it's no surprise to me - we had a GP who used homeopathy in the 90s). Instead it was based on anecdotal guidance - the kind of thing that appeared to work. Evidence-based medicine has since improved the field, trying where possible to base decisions on evidence, ideally based on randomised controlled trials. The first part of Helen Pearson's book covers this well - though I think it's by far the least interesting part of what we discover. Instead what's truly fascinating is the rest of it, looking at a wide range of other fields where evidence was rarely properly used and that are only now starting to dip a toe in the water. These include social policy, policing, conservation, business and education. The main part of the book gives us examples of how bad these areas have been in terms of basing decisions on what's always been ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Random Universe - Andrew Jaffe *****

This is an absolutely fascinating book for anyone interested in the way that science really works, bearing in mind the difficulties of having to base our models and theories on induction. Andrew Jaffe introduces the difficulties we face when trying to take a scientific view because largely we are dependent on induction: predicting the future from what has previously been observed. He explores what probability is, the two key ways of looking at it (frequentist and Bayesian) and how scientists use (or misuse it) to work out the implications of their experiments for hypotheses. This is then expanded into looking at the nature of scientific models and the philosophy of science before heading out to entropy, quantum randomness and attempting to achieve meaningful cosmology with its potential dearth of evidence.  The topic might sound a little dry, but in fact Jaffe does it with good humour and a very readable style. For example, he uses measuring his daughter's height by making marks on...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more