Skip to main content

Flaxman Low: Occult Detective - E. and E. Heron ****

It's an easy assumption (which I made) that this book is fantasy as it involves a ghost hunter, but I'm calling it SF, as at the time of publication at the end of the nineteenth century, the Society for Psychical Research was treating such phenomena as a subject of scientific investigation, and there has been plenty of SF where the 'science' has been anything but correct.

This is part of MIT Press's Radium Age series, which brings back titles from the period when science fiction was just starting to emerge. Often writing from this period was stodgy and no longer easy to read: arguably with little other entertainment available in the home, there was far less need for good writing than is the case now. But short stories of the period can often work better - think how well, for instance, the Sherlock Holmes stories hold up. Although the Herons (in reality mother and son team, the bizarrely named Kate O'Brien Ryall Pritchard and Hesketh Hesketh-Pritchard) aren't up to Conan Doyle's standards, they do a reasonable job of making the work of their hero, Flaxman Low passable.

The stories are suitably gothic - quite often the apparitions are able to physically interact with their surroundings, causing harm or even death. We also get a few more corporeal investigations with some of the horror classics such as mummies and vampires, and even a fungal foe. Flaxman Low is that new contribution to the scientific world, a psychologist, and his role seems mainly to assess in an objective fashion the psychology of the spirit - why it is doing the nasty business it is. The only problem with this approach is that, unlike, say, the puzzles solved by Holmes, Low can rarely offer a solution, merely an explanation, which gives the stories less punch. There is, however, one magnificent piece of advice. A character heads to get a medic. The doctor turns out to be 'a big, powerful Irishman, rather the worse for liquor, but with the deep eye and square jaw that indicates ability.' So next time you are concerned about your medical treatment, just check the eye and jaw of the physician.

I must, say I don't understand why the illustrator seems to have portrayed Low on the cover as something close to a 1920s or 30s German army officer - the style is totally inappropriate for something set (and written) in the 1890s, but I presume it's down to a look the whole series uses. In fact, given radium wasn't isolated until 1910, it's arguable this isn't a radium age set of stories, any more than, say, the H. G. Wells classics like War of the Worlds, The Time Machine or First Men in the Moon could be attributed to that period.

All in all, for someone who enjoys very much the tales of Conan Doyle and his contemporaries, along with the better early science fiction, despite the sometimes lacklustre endings of the stories, I was really glad to have read this contribution to the series. Fun stuff.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more