Skip to main content

Flaxman Low: Occult Detective - E. and E. Heron ****

It's an easy assumption (which I made) that this book is fantasy as it involves a ghost hunter, but I'm calling it SF, as at the time of publication at the end of the nineteenth century, the Society for Psychical Research was treating such phenomena as a subject of scientific investigation, and there has been plenty of SF where the 'science' has been anything but correct.

This is part of MIT Press's Radium Age series, which brings back titles from the period when science fiction was just starting to emerge. Often writing from this period was stodgy and no longer easy to read: arguably with little other entertainment available in the home, there was far less need for good writing than is the case now. But short stories of the period can often work better - think how well, for instance, the Sherlock Holmes stories hold up. Although the Herons (in reality mother and son team, the bizarrely named Kate O'Brien Ryall Pritchard and Hesketh Hesketh-Pritchard) aren't up to Conan Doyle's standards, they do a reasonable job of making the work of their hero, Flaxman Low passable.

The stories are suitably gothic - quite often the apparitions are able to physically interact with their surroundings, causing harm or even death. We also get a few more corporeal investigations with some of the horror classics such as mummies and vampires, and even a fungal foe. Flaxman Low is that new contribution to the scientific world, a psychologist, and his role seems mainly to assess in an objective fashion the psychology of the spirit - why it is doing the nasty business it is. The only problem with this approach is that, unlike, say, the puzzles solved by Holmes, Low can rarely offer a solution, merely an explanation, which gives the stories less punch. There is, however, one magnificent piece of advice. A character heads to get a medic. The doctor turns out to be 'a big, powerful Irishman, rather the worse for liquor, but with the deep eye and square jaw that indicates ability.' So next time you are concerned about your medical treatment, just check the eye and jaw of the physician.

I must, say I don't understand why the illustrator seems to have portrayed Low on the cover as something close to a 1920s or 30s German army officer - the style is totally inappropriate for something set (and written) in the 1890s, but I presume it's down to a look the whole series uses. In fact, given radium wasn't isolated until 1910, it's arguable this isn't a radium age set of stories, any more than, say, the H. G. Wells classics like War of the Worlds, The Time Machine or First Men in the Moon could be attributed to that period.

All in all, for someone who enjoys very much the tales of Conan Doyle and his contemporaries, along with the better early science fiction, despite the sometimes lacklustre endings of the stories, I was really glad to have read this contribution to the series. Fun stuff.

Paperback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Infinity Machine - Sebastian Mallaby ****

It's very quickly clear that Sebastian Mallaby is a huge Demis Hassabis fan - writing about the only child prodigy and teen genius ever who was also a nice, rounded personality. After a few chapters, though, things settle down (I'm reminded of Douglas Adams' description of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy ) and we get a good, solid trip through the journey that gave us DeepMind, their AlphaGo and AlphaFold programs, the sudden explosion of competition on the AI front and thoughts on artificial general intelligence. Although Mallaby does occasionally still go into fan mode - reading this you would think that AlphaFold had successfully perfectly predicted the structure of every protein, where it is usually not sufficiently accurate for its results to have direct practical application - we get a real feel for the way this relatively unusual company was swiftly and successfully developed away from Silicon Valley. It's readable and gives an important understanding of...

God: the Science, the Evidence - Michel-Yves Bolloré and Olivier Bonnassies ***

This is, to say the least, an oddity, but a fascinating one. A translation of a French bestseller, it aims to put forward an examination of the scientific evidence for the existence of a deity… and various other things, as this is a very oddly structured book (more on that in a moment). In The God Delusion , Richard Dawkins suggested that we should treat the existence of God as a scientific claim, which is exactly what the authors do reasonably well in the main part of the book. They argue that three pieces of scientific evidence in particular are supportive of the existence of a (generic) creator of the universe. These are that the universe had a beginning, the fine tuning of natural constants and the unlikeliness of life.  To support their evidence, Bolloré and Bonnassies give a reasonable introduction to thermodynamics and cosmology. They suggest that the expected heat death of the universe implies a beginning (for good thermodynamic reasons), and rightly give the impression tha...

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...