Skip to main content

Flaxman Low: Occult Detective - E. and E. Heron ****

It's an easy assumption (which I made) that this book is fantasy as it involves a ghost hunter, but I'm calling it SF, as at the time of publication at the end of the nineteenth century, the Society for Psychical Research was treating such phenomena as a subject of scientific investigation, and there has been plenty of SF where the 'science' has been anything but correct.

This is part of MIT Press's Radium Age series, which brings back titles from the period when science fiction was just starting to emerge. Often writing from this period was stodgy and no longer easy to read: arguably with little other entertainment available in the home, there was far less need for good writing than is the case now. But short stories of the period can often work better - think how well, for instance, the Sherlock Holmes stories hold up. Although the Herons (in reality mother and son team, the bizarrely named Kate O'Brien Ryall Pritchard and Hesketh Hesketh-Pritchard) aren't up to Conan Doyle's standards, they do a reasonable job of making the work of their hero, Flaxman Low passable.

The stories are suitably gothic - quite often the apparitions are able to physically interact with their surroundings, causing harm or even death. We also get a few more corporeal investigations with some of the horror classics such as mummies and vampires, and even a fungal foe. Flaxman Low is that new contribution to the scientific world, a psychologist, and his role seems mainly to assess in an objective fashion the psychology of the spirit - why it is doing the nasty business it is. The only problem with this approach is that, unlike, say, the puzzles solved by Holmes, Low can rarely offer a solution, merely an explanation, which gives the stories less punch. There is, however, one magnificent piece of advice. A character heads to get a medic. The doctor turns out to be 'a big, powerful Irishman, rather the worse for liquor, but with the deep eye and square jaw that indicates ability.' So next time you are concerned about your medical treatment, just check the eye and jaw of the physician.

I must, say I don't understand why the illustrator seems to have portrayed Low on the cover as something close to a 1920s or 30s German army officer - the style is totally inappropriate for something set (and written) in the 1890s, but I presume it's down to a look the whole series uses. In fact, given radium wasn't isolated until 1910, it's arguable this isn't a radium age set of stories, any more than, say, the H. G. Wells classics like War of the Worlds, The Time Machine or First Men in the Moon could be attributed to that period.

All in all, for someone who enjoys very much the tales of Conan Doyle and his contemporaries, along with the better early science fiction, despite the sometimes lacklustre endings of the stories, I was really glad to have read this contribution to the series. Fun stuff.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...
Post a Comment
Read more