Skip to main content

Ian Stewart - Five Way Interview

Ian Stewart is emeritus Professor of Mathematics at the University of Warwick, England. He is a Fellow of the Royal Society and served on its Council from 2014 to 2017. He has an MA from the University of Cambridge, a PhD from Warwick, and six honorary degrees. His awards include the Michael Faraday Medal of the Royal Society, the Gold Medal of the Institute of Mathematics and Its Applications, the Lewis Thomas Prize for Science Writing from Rockefeller University, and the Chancellor’s Medal from the University of Warwick. He delivered the 1997 Christmas Lecture series on BBC television. He has written more than 140 books, including many popular books on mathematics, several science fiction novels, and the Science of Discworld series with Jack Cohen and Terry Pratchett. His latest book is Reaching for the Extreme.

Why maths?

Without maths the human race would still be living in caves. Most people don't understand how vital it is to everyday life, for several reasons. They think it's limited to what they studied at school under that name — it's not — and its uses are hidden from view inside tech gadgets. In 2024, workers in mathematical science occupations contributed £489 billion to the UK economy (19% of total gross value added) and were 27% more productive economically than other occupations. Go figure.

Why this book?

It started out as a book about the shapes of bubbles — minimal surfaces in the jargon — and broadened out into a discussion of a major theme in maths: seeking extremes. Largest volumes, shortest trips for delivery vehicles and SatNav, best strategies in games, minimal energy shapes for protein molecules. Mathematicians always want to improve their ideas, get better results. A secondary theme is how mathematicians think, and the search for extremes illustrates that attitude very well.

Infinity is a concept that seems to intrigue people from school age upwards: what do you think the appeal is of a topic that (outside, perhaps, of the limit aspect in calculus) has very little connection to everyday life?

I'd start by disputing that it has very little connection to everyday life! But I admit, that's what it looks like, for the same reasons people don't see all the maths that their lives are depending on. Most area of maths use the infinite in some form or another, if only because the counting numbers 1,2,3,... go on, in principle, forever. But the fascination with the infinite isn't about practicalities. It's such a mind-blowing concept. Fraught with logical pitfalls and paradoxes, of course, which add to the allure. 

What’s next?

For maths? One major trend is the rapidly growing interaction with computers, in particular AI, which is based on basic mathematical trickery computed at high speed and in huge amounts. Computers provide mathematicians with new tools; mathematicians provide new ideas for how to use computers. Not all of the results are positive, as we're now worrying about, but many are. Another is the application of maths to biology. Beyond that, maths is now showing up almost everywhere. In politics (detecting gerrymandering, analysing voting methods); in medicine (drug design, protein structure, scanners); in transportation (efficient aircraft); and so on. 

For me? Six science fiction novels, new editions of four popular science books, and my research (see next question). Plus family life, now into four generations. 

What’s exciting you at the moment?

I'm still active at age 80, and my current research area is about what happens when individual 'dynamical systems' are hooked together into a network. A dynamical system is something that evolves over time according to fixed rules. Biology, in particular, is littered with networks of this kind:  networks of nerve cells in the brain and the body; networks of genes switching each other on and off to control how an embryo grows; networks of animals and planets forming an ecosystem. Many other areas too — the Internet, electrical power grids, road and rail. Marty Golubitsky and I recently produced an 850-page book on all this, and another four-author book focused on biology is in the press. I mostly wander around in the no-man's-land between theory and applications. 

These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...
Post a Comment
Read more