Skip to main content

Macroscope (SF) - Piers Anthony ***

Having recently re-read a classic in Neuromancer, a friend asked if I'd come across Macroscope (which I hadn't). Dating back to 1969, it's very much a period piece. It reinforces my view of Piers Anthony as capable of coming up with interesting and different ideas but not being a great writer in terms of style.

The macroscope in question is a kind of super-telescope that instead of using photons makes use of macrons (as opposed to macarons) - which travel at the speed of light but don't follow an inverse power law, making it possible to observe in detail what happens at any location in the galaxy. But it can also act as a kind of super-educator with a catch.

Central characters initially are two mid-twenties individuals: Brad who is super-intelligent and Ivo who is super-intuitive. They have a mysterious past which is only hinted at - Brad brings in Ivo to try to deal with the aforementioned catch that the macroscope wrecks the brains of intelligent people when trying to obtain information from alien races. (Soon after, Brad becomes less of a central character and three others are added to the mix, but I can't say why without spoilers.)

Our heroes head out to Neptune to avoid the UN (surely there are easier ways to do this), but escaping requires surviving 10 g for a long period - the solution for this is weird in the extreme (not to mention unsavoury in its description), though it does allow for the sort of discussion the crew of the Enterprise really should have had about using the transporter. (Apparently it does come up in James Blish's Star Trek novel Spock Must Die.) Along the way we get plenty of obsession with IQ and racial identity.

From here on in things get more and more extreme and when the crew arrive at the location of one of the sources of the signal that wrecks brains, we find astrology worryingly taking on a major role along with odd excursions into something between dreams and the ability to move to different times and places. Frankly, the last part is a bit of a mess.

The date the book is set in is initially somewhat confusing. Ivo was born in 1955 and is around 25 - and later evidence suggests the setting is 1980. This is reinforced by them using Saturn VI rockets (presumably imagined as the follow up to the Apollo Saturn Vs). Yet it's hard to imagine anyone in 1969 really imagined the developments in space travel featured here would be possible by that year - and more confusingly, Ivo sometimes appears to remember events before 1955, though this is presumably an early dip into those experiences between dreams and time travel.

This is makes the book a fascinating relic of the period, if not always very readable. Anthony throws in the kitchen sink and reveals what's happening sufficiently slowly that it can be frustrating to read, not helped by his limited abilities as a writer. And I really find it difficult to forgive the inclusion of astrology as a science. But Macroscope is definitely worth a place as a significant book in SF history, even if it's read more as a curiosity than an enjoyable experience.

Paperback:   

Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Luna: Moon Rising (SF) - Ian McDonald ****

I'm not the natural audience for this book. Game of Thrones l eaves me cold - and it's hard not to feel the influence of GoT (and a whole lot of Dune )   underneath a veneer of science fiction and the trappings of a South American drug cartel in the cod-medieval family power battles and chivalric details. There are even dragons (of a sort). I'd be really sad if the future did involve this sort of throwback feudalism. However, remarkably, despite this I found Luna: Moon Rising kept me engaged. The fact is that Ian McDonald can put together a good plot with intricate machinations, which is enough to carry the reader through what can be a bewildering collection of characters. The two page scene-setter saying who did what to whom at the start was useful, but I could have done with family trees for the main family as I was constantly forgetting who was who - especially easy as McDonald endows many families with characters with the same first initial (e.g. Ariel and Al...

Adventures of a Computational Explorer - Stephen Wolfram ***

Stephen Wolfram, the man behind the scientist's mathematical tool of choice, Mathematica, plus a whole host of other software products, including the uncanny Wolfram Alpha knowledge engine, is undoubtedly a genius of the first order. In this book, we get an uncensored excursion into the mind of genius - which is, without doubt, a fascinating prospect. The book consists of a collection of essays and speeches that Wolfram has produced over the last ten to fifteen years, covering an eclectic range of topics. Like all such collections, the result is something that lacks the coherence of a book with a narrative that runs through it, inevitably introducing a degree of repetition and a mix of interesting and not-so-interesting topics - but there's likely to be something to catch the attention anyone who is into computing or mathematics. One of the most interesting pieces is the opening one, where Wolfram describes being a consultant on the SF movie Arrival. He seems to hav...

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...