Here we get collected what should be some of his greatest short stories and novellas, starting with the classic and poignant A Rose for Ecclesiastes. For some reason in the intro we are told about a story that's not included that should be - 24 Views of Mount Fuji by Hokusai - why isn't it here, then? In some ways, the experience of reading the book was a disappointment, because I think I prefer the lowbrow version of Zelazny's writing in those Amber books, rather than his new wave, more intellectual work, which mostly features here.
I did enjoy Home is the Hangman where a mysterious character tries to intercept a killer AI robot with unexpected consequences (doubly interesting as AI is so much more a real thing now than it was when Zelazny wrote this), while LOKI 7281 is a fun little in-joke story where well-known (named) SF writers' work is being rewritten without their knowledge by AI PCs. He Who Shapes is also impressive: a long story about an analyst who Inception-like goes into and shapes people's dreams, facing the ultimate challenge of a blind subject. On the other hand, even the intro has a bit of a downer on Damnation Alley, which I agree hasn't aged well, and typically of new wave SF, too many of the shorts were miserable: for example, Corrida featuring a kind of human bullfight and the tedious Permafrost.
Tellingly, three of the best here were really fantasy. One of his best-known is The Doors of His Face, the Lamps of His Mouth, which has a touch of Melville and Hemingway about it, but despite the pretentious title is an engaging tale of a sea monster hunt on a fantasy, inhabitable version of Venus. And A Rose for Ecclesiastes is set on a fantasy inhabitable Mars, where Martians are biologically human. The short story chosen to close the book is another of Zelazny's best, a pure fantasy about three figures from Arthurian legend in the present day: Last Defender of Camelot.
In his intellectual mode, Zelazny has a tendency to go into lectures, or characters' thought processes, where he can drop names of intellectuals of the period and what they thought - for me this too doesn't age well. The book hasn't put me off Zelazny. I still love Roadmarks, Doorways in the Sand, A Night in the Lonesome October, the Amber books (which I must re-read) and more. And there's some really good material in here. But it wasn't quite as enjoyable an experience as I expected it to be.
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here



Comments
Post a Comment