Skip to main content

The Best of Roger Zelazny (SF) - Roger Zelazny ****

If there was an A to Z of SF greats, while even younger science fiction readers could probably come up with A for Asimov, far fewer are likely to make Z for Zelazny - which is a shame. Unusually, Zelazny spanned science fiction and fantasy - although a touch pulpy, his Princes in Amber series of books were a genuinely different fantasy series - but he was also, without doubt one of the leading SF writers of the twentieth century.

Here we get collected what should be some of his greatest short stories and novellas, starting with the classic and poignant A Rose for Ecclesiastes. For some reason in the intro we are told about a story that's not included that should be - 24 Views of Mount Fuji by Hokusai - why isn't it here, then? In some ways, the experience of reading the book was a disappointment, because I think I prefer the lowbrow version of Zelazny's writing in those Amber books, rather than his new wave, more intellectual work, which mostly features here.

I did enjoy Home is the Hangman where a mysterious character tries to intercept a killer AI robot with unexpected consequences (doubly interesting as AI is so much more a real thing now than it was when Zelazny wrote this), while LOKI 7281 is a fun little in-joke story where well-known (named) SF writers' work is being rewritten without their knowledge by AI PCs. He Who Shapes is also impressive: a long story about an analyst who Inception-like goes into and shapes people's dreams, facing the ultimate challenge of a blind subject. On the other hand, even the intro has a bit of a downer on Damnation Alley, which I agree hasn't aged well, and typically of new wave SF, too many of the shorts were miserable: for example, Corrida featuring a kind of human bullfight and the tedious Permafrost. 

Tellingly, three of the best here were really fantasy. One of his best-known is The Doors of His Face, the Lamps of His Mouth, which has a touch of Melville and Hemingway about it, but despite the pretentious title is an engaging tale of a sea monster hunt on a fantasy, inhabitable version of Venus. And A Rose for Ecclesiastes is set on a fantasy inhabitable Mars, where Martians are biologically human. The short story chosen to close the book is another of Zelazny's best, a pure fantasy about three figures from Arthurian legend in the present day: Last Defender of Camelot.

In his intellectual mode, Zelazny has a tendency to go into lectures, or characters' thought processes, where he can drop names of intellectuals of the period and what they thought - for me this too doesn't age well. The book hasn't put me off Zelazny. I still love Roadmarks, Doorways in the Sand, A Night in the Lonesome October, the Amber books (which I must re-read) and more. And there's some really good material in here. But it wasn't quite as enjoyable an experience as I expected it to be.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...
Post a Comment
Read more