Skip to main content

The Science of Repair - Gwen Ottinger ***

This is an odd one. Ignore the title that sounds like it describes what goes on in a household repair shop - Gwen Ottinger makes an important point about the way that the attempt to use science to support social justice - such as when a community is blighted by pollution from an oil well - can be both positive and negative. While it's true that science can be used to identify pollutants and risks, scientists' natural tendency to caution may make a risk seem less significant than it is - and there is a danger that only the science viewpoint prevails, where the experience of those living in bad conditions is important too. All too often, scientists can dismiss local knowledge. 

My old literary agent's first question when approached with a book idea was always 'is it a book or a magazine article?' I think this would be well applied here. Ottinger's point could have been well-made in a feature-length article, but there was an awful lot of repetition required to stretch out to a (short) book.

This is one of the reasons that I can't rate the book too highly, even though that central idea is a very important one. The inability of citizens to fight back against polluters seems particularly strong in the US (think Erin Brockowich) and they need all the help they can get. The other issue I had was the way the whole story is presented is through the painful lens of US academic obsession with identity politics and race. On the opening page we read 'Its authors, Jay Gunkelman and Marilyn Bardet, were white community activists' - it is totally irrelevant that they were white. 

There is also a lack of acknowledgement of a problem in recognising lived experience - humans are really terrible at distinguishing correlation from causality. Ottinger criticises scientists, for instance, for saying 'there is no evidence that X causes Y', but the alternative, which she seems to approve of, is on a par with witch finding. Historically, if there was a cluster of local illnesses or bad luck, it would be blamed on the local witch. Now it tends to be the phone mast or the power lines. It's natural for random events to cluster - but if we see a cluster of events we attribute causality to our local bugbear, whatever it may be. This doesn't mean there can't be a causal connection, but the reality is that without a rigorous scientific approach there will still be witches to blame. 

The reality is that many scientists are really bad at communicating with non-scientists, and I had hoped this book would give them guidance on how to get facts across to community activists in a way that's useful - but it doesn't. Ottinger is not providing an adequate solution to a very real problem. The subtitle is all about the way that believing in facts leads to better justice: but I'm not sure how this is addressed here.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ignorance: How it drives science – Stuart Firestein *****

This is a delightful little book that really gets you thinking. I stress the ‘little’ part not as a negative, but as a good thing. There is nothing worse than fat, bloated popular science books where the author feels they have to get 120,000 words to be taken seriously. This is the sort of book that can be read in a couple of hours – but you will get so much more out of it than one of those tedious doorstops. The premise underlying the book is in once sense extremely simple, yet is fundamental to an understanding of what science is and what scientists do. And it is an understanding that is totally at odds with the typical way science is portrayed both in university lectures and popular science books. As Stuart Firestein points out, what is important is not the facts, but rather the area of ignorance. The interesting part and the fundamental heart of science is not about what we know, but about what we don’t know and where we want to look next. Take this lovely quote: ‘Working ...

Who Invented the Computer? – Ian Watson

Ian Watson is the author of  The Universal Machine  and featured in a recent  Four Way Interview . Saturday June 23 2012 was the centenary of the birth of Alan Turing, the troubled genius who invented the modern computer. Why though do so few people recognize his name and his great achievements? In 1936 English mathematician Alan Turing, published a paper,  On Computable Numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem . This became the foundation of computing. In it Turing presented a theoretical machine that could solve any problem that could be described by instructions encoded on a paper tape. A Turing Machine could calculate square roots, whilst another might solve Sudoku puzzles. Turing demonstrated you could construct a single  Universal Machine  that could simulate any Turing Machine. One machine solving any problem for which a program could be written – sound familiar? He’d invented the computer. Then,  computers  were peop...

The Star Book – Peter Grego ****

This attractive landscape format book combines an excellent introduction to the stars and basic astronomy with a set of star maps, plus in depth looks at some of the stars featured, with a  bonus section on the solar system. Amazon says it’s a hardback, but in fact it’s a paperback with a rather ingenious cover – you can’t tell from the photo, but the words ‘The Star Book’ are punched through as a series of holes that show the white paper of the next page beneath. Like many astronomy/space books, the cover lacks shelf appeal because it is mostly black, but at least there is some original thought here. Unlike many books in this format which tend to concentrate on the pictures, there is a good deal of excellent text by Peter Grego, so there was no feeling that you were only getting the star maps and star ‘biographies’, something these days much more suited to an iPad or smartphone app. Instead, the opening 30 or so pages give a very good introduction that would be valuable to ...