Skip to main content

Where the Axe is Buried (SF) - Ray Nayler ***

This book was described to me as a 'gripping technological thriller'. It's not that at all - it's a book driven by ideas and politics which for structural reasons entirely fails to thrill, but is interesting nonetheless.

Ray Nayler portrays a grim future - the West has replaced democracy with AI benevolent dictators as permanent 'Prime Ministers', while 'the Federation', essentially Russia, has an eternal non-benevolent dictator as its President, able to move from body to body. While both of these central conceits are extremely unlikely, they do provide useful vehicles for thinking about the nature of society and politics - in this sense it's an impressive book.

The two key characters are Zoya, the dying author of a transformative political text that seems to be able to capture people's hearts and minds and is a death sentence to own in her homeland of the Federation, and Lilia, another Russian who has escaped to London, where she constructs some remarkable technology before returning to be captured on a visit to her father. As the novel progresses they both have a major part to play in an attempt to overthrow the President, while the West has its own problems with the AI Prime Ministers.

There are two things that get in the way of the book working as anything approximating to a thriller. Firstly it starts with what's now become a clichéd approach of chapter after chapter introducing new characters in different locations, seemingly unconnected but eventually linked. This makes it difficult to identify with any of the characters - even difficult to remember who is who. The other problem is that the book is driven by page after page of inner monologues with brief spurts of dialogue or action. I'm sure it's very arty, but it makes for uninspiring reading.

There are a couple of smaller issues too. On the science front, Lilia's amazing one-woman invention (something that really would take a huge academic team) involves quantum entanglement in a way that entanglement simply could not work - it feels like the entanglement is thrown in rather as quacks use 'quantum' in claims for their pseudoscientific medical treatments. Then there's the usual problem of trying to give us quotes from a transformative book that would change the world - and ending up with a set of wishy-washy platitudes. Finally, Nayler falls for the usual SF habit of applying new names to something that is clearly a development of an existing piece of technology - his 'terminals' are phones, and that's what they would be called.

I did read the book all the way to the end as I was engaged enough to want to find out how it turned out - but it wasn't a thrilling experience. If you haven't already read it, I preferred Nayler's The Mountain in the Sea, though that too had some issues as a work of fiction.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more