Skip to main content

Where the Axe is Buried (SF) - Ray Nayler ***

This book was described to me as a 'gripping technological thriller'. It's not that at all - it's a book driven by ideas and politics which for structural reasons entirely fails to thrill, but is interesting nonetheless.

Ray Nayler portrays a grim future - the West has replaced democracy with AI benevolent dictators as permanent 'Prime Ministers', while 'the Federation', essentially Russia, has an eternal non-benevolent dictator as its President, able to move from body to body. While both of these central conceits are extremely unlikely, they do provide useful vehicles for thinking about the nature of society and politics - in this sense it's an impressive book.

The two key characters are Zoya, the dying author of a transformative political text that seems to be able to capture people's hearts and minds and is a death sentence to own in her homeland of the Federation, and Lilia, another Russian who has escaped to London, where she constructs some remarkable technology before returning to be captured on a visit to her father. As the novel progresses they both have a major part to play in an attempt to overthrow the President, while the West has its own problems with the AI Prime Ministers.

There are two things that get in the way of the book working as anything approximating to a thriller. Firstly it starts with what's now become a clichéd approach of chapter after chapter introducing new characters in different locations, seemingly unconnected but eventually linked. This makes it difficult to identify with any of the characters - even difficult to remember who is who. The other problem is that the book is driven by page after page of inner monologues with brief spurts of dialogue or action. I'm sure it's very arty, but it makes for uninspiring reading.

There are a couple of smaller issues too. On the science front, Lilia's amazing one-woman invention (something that really would take a huge academic team) involves quantum entanglement in a way that entanglement simply could not work - it feels like the entanglement is thrown in rather as quacks use 'quantum' in claims for their pseudoscientific medical treatments. Then there's the usual problem of trying to give us quotes from a transformative book that would change the world - and ending up with a set of wishy-washy platitudes. Finally, Nayler falls for the usual SF habit of applying new names to something that is clearly a development of an existing piece of technology - his 'terminals' are phones, and that's what they would be called.

I did read the book all the way to the end as I was engaged enough to want to find out how it turned out - but it wasn't a thrilling experience. If you haven't already read it, I preferred Nayler's The Mountain in the Sea, though that too had some issues as a work of fiction.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...
Post a Comment
Read more