Skip to main content

Liz Kalaugher - Five Way Interview

Liz Kalaugher is a science journalist and campaigner, based in Bristol, who has written for the New Scientist, BBC Wildlife, the Guardian, BBC News and more, as well as winning science journalism fellowships from the World Federation of Science Journalists and the European Geosciences Union. She is also the co-author of Furry Logic: The Physics of Animal Life. Her new book is The Elephant in the Room.

Why science?

I think science is fascinating as it helps us interact with the world. Once you start to understand how things work, it opens up all sorts of possibilities. You’re no longer stumbling around in the dark, hoping you’ll find the light switch by chance; instead you’re building a map of where the light switch might be, and testing that map systematically. Hopefully that means you’ll find the light switch more easily, and learn techniques that can help you find other switches. Though lots of scientific discoveries have been made by chance. And it’s crucially important that we don’t think we know more than we do - that can lead to all sorts of trouble.

Why this book?

Originally I was planning to write a book about Grevy’s zebras: I was travelling in Kenya in search of these animals just after the first cases of Covid-19 broke out in China. Like everybody’s, my mind turned to the emergence of new diseases. Concerned there might be a backlash against bats, I started investigating the other side of the coin - just how much we’ve been harming wildlife health over the centuries. I was surprised by how long and in how many ways human activities have spread diseases to wildlife. And by how much we can do about wildlife health that we haven’t yet chosen to act on.

Apart from reducing deforestation, what is the single thing we could do with the biggest impact to reduce the risk of zoonotic transmission?

According to a study from 2024, reducing biodiversity loss is one of the most crucial factors in cutting the risk of outbreaks of disease. As Neil Vora of Conservation International told me for The Elephant in the Room, 'Nature is not the solution to everything, but nature is critical, a necessary condition for a better future. We need to start investing in nature now and that will save costs down the road.' Investing in nature would also reduce climate change, another factor that boosts disease, and it would save species from extinction.

What’s next?

Next up will be another book broadly in the wildlife and environment space, again with a historical angle. I’m researching it at the moment and wrangling with almost too many fascinating stories. I’m also enjoying experimenting with fiction in the form of an eco-thriller. Watch this space.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

I’m enjoying seeing more butterflies in the UK this summer, a welcome treat after their terrible season in 2024. I’m focusing on their striking colours as they flit between flowers, and the poetry of their names – comma, skipper, silver-washed fritillary - whilst trying not to think about why it’s been so hot. I’ve also become a Merlin fan and use this app’s help to listen out for new bird species wherever I go.

These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more