Skip to main content

Free Creations of the Human Mind - Diana Kormos Buchwald and Michael Gordin *****

It's hard to believe that there could be anything more that could usefully be written about Einstein - and then this impressive little book comes along. ('Little' is not a negative here - I love short books that cram a lot in, and this one delivers impressively.) Rather than present us with the classic scientific biography, Diana Kormos Buchwald and Michael Gordin take six different cuts through Einstein's life and work, examining the process that produced his views and beliefs.

After a prologue that brings together Einstein's interests and the challenges he faced we get six chapters. The first contrasts his life and work in Bern (where he had his wonder year of 1905) and Princeton as the 'sage' of the Institute for Advanced Study. We then get sections on relativity (both special and general), on quantum theory, on his sense of place and belonging (whether it be a lack of nationalism or his support for a Jewish state), on war and peace (given Einstein's profound pacifism) and on philosophy of science, leading to the title of this book, derived from a speech Einstein gave in Oxford in 1933 - where he was making clear that it is human reasoning giving structure to what we can discover from experiment and measurement that provides the scientific system.

What really impressed me was getting an understanding that went far deeper than much popular science without ever being overly technical (the authors are historians rather than science writers: we only get enough of the science to give context). One example that stand outs to me was the debate between Einstein and Bohr over quantum theory. The simplistic popular science view (of which I have been guilty in the past) is Einstein laying a foundation but then trying wholeheartedly to focus on the problems of the theory while Bohr defended it. This certainly became the case later on, but there was a period in the 20s when the implications of Compton scattering were taken by Einstein as clear evidence of light being made up of quantum particles, while Bohr was reluctant to take this step wholeheartedly.

This isn't light reading - it takes a bit of work. And the structure does mean there is a certain amount of overlap and non-linearity between chapters. But the reader is richly rewarded if they want to get more of a feel for Einstein's views and how they shaped the world around him. There is so much more to this book that something like Rovelli's hugely popular Seven Brief Lessons (which will soon be out in a 10th anniversary edition at about the same price) - it deserves a wide readership.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more