Skip to main content

Free Creations of the Human Mind - Diana Kormos Buchwald and Michael Gordin *****

It's hard to believe that there could be anything more that could usefully be written about Einstein - and then this impressive little book comes along. ('Little' is not a negative here - I love short books that cram a lot in, and this one delivers impressively.) Rather than present us with the classic scientific biography, Diana Kormos Buchwald and Michael Gordin take six different cuts through Einstein's life and work, examining the process that produced his views and beliefs.

After a prologue that brings together Einstein's interests and the challenges he faced we get six chapters. The first contrasts his life and work in Bern (where he had his wonder year of 1905) and Princeton as the 'sage' of the Institute for Advanced Study. We then get sections on relativity (both special and general), on quantum theory, on his sense of place and belonging (whether it be a lack of nationalism or his support for a Jewish state), on war and peace (given Einstein's profound pacifism) and on philosophy of science, leading to the title of this book, derived from a speech Einstein gave in Oxford in 1933 - where he was making clear that it is human reasoning giving structure to what we can discover from experiment and measurement that provides the scientific system.

What really impressed me was getting an understanding that went far deeper than much popular science without ever being overly technical (the authors are historians rather than science writers: we only get enough of the science to give context). One example that stand outs to me was the debate between Einstein and Bohr over quantum theory. The simplistic popular science view (of which I have been guilty in the past) is Einstein laying a foundation but then trying wholeheartedly to focus on the problems of the theory while Bohr defended it. This certainly became the case later on, but there was a period in the 20s when the implications of Compton scattering were taken by Einstein as clear evidence of light being made up of quantum particles, while Bohr was reluctant to take this step wholeheartedly.

This isn't light reading - it takes a bit of work. And the structure does mean there is a certain amount of overlap and non-linearity between chapters. But the reader is richly rewarded if they want to get more of a feel for Einstein's views and how they shaped the world around him. There is so much more to this book that something like Rovelli's hugely popular Seven Brief Lessons (which will soon be out in a 10th anniversary edition at about the same price) - it deserves a wide readership.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more