Skip to main content

Entropy - James Binney ****

Most people are familiar with energy, both in its everyday sense as a resource used for things like heating and powering electrical equipment, and – if they were paying attention in school – as a fundamental property of the physical world that can be converted from one form into another, but never created or destroyed. Entropy, the subject of this book, is a similar but much less well known fundamental physical property. As James Binney says in the first chapter, ‘most people without a degree in physics or chemistry will not have heard of entropy, and probably few of those with relevant degrees could explain what entropy is with any clarity’.

It’s true that entropy is one of the more difficult concepts in physics, at least as regards its precise scientific meaning. At an intuitive level, however, even people who have never heard the word are probably aware of it. If you’ve ever had a sneaking suspicion that energy might not actually be conserved in the way science teachers say it is – because in your experience things are always running down and wearing out – then that’s a consequence of entropy. In simple terms, it can be thought of as a measure of how much ‘useless’ energy there is in a closed system, in the sense of energy that can’t be exploited to any practical purpose. And entropy, unlike energy, isn’t conserved – it can increase, but it can never decrease. If conservation of energy is the good news, then entropy is the bad news. As Binney points out more than once in the book, energy is free – it’s in abundant supply all around us. What costs money, and causes so many headaches for politicians and the public alike, is low-entropy energy that can actually be used for something.

Rewinding to the end of the first paragraph, you may spot something a little odd. If James Binney knows there are so few people that have even heard of entropy, why has he used it as a single-word title of this book? The answer is quite simple: it’s part of OUP’s long-running ‘Very Short Introduction’ series, which operates within well-established constraints – one of these being that the title is always a straight description of the subject matter. As to the style of the books themselves, they are indeed short – this one is only a little over a hundred small pages – and they are ‘introductions’, in the sense of assuming the reader starts with zero knowledge of the subject. As a rule, though, they’re aimed at serious readers who need a quick but thorough-going crash course – whether that’s to pass an exam or for a work-related project – rather than general readers looking for a few entertaining and memorable highlights. In the context of a science subject like this one, the result isn’t really what you would understand by the term ‘popular science’, and was never meant to be.

As regards this specific book, casual readers will find it bombards them with far more technical detail than they wanted to know about the mathematical definitions of entropy, its relationship to other areas of physics, and the way that scientists and engineers use it in their everyday work. Even so, there are some fascinating insights, particularly on the historical development of the subject – with various eminent scientists spending several decades of the nineteenth century trying to unscramble their understanding of energy and entropy – as well as its relationship to cutting-edge areas of modern physics such as quantum entanglement and black holes. There are also a few interesting examples – though not as many as I would have liked – of what might be called ‘everyday’ applications of entropy, for example in heat pumps and image processing.

The very title of this book, and the fact that it’s part of this particular OUP series, means that in practice anyone who buys it will have a pretty good idea what they’re letting themselves in for. It’s these readers that my 4-star rating is aimed at. On the other hand, if it happened to come into the hands of a more general popular science reader, they’re likely to find far more technical detail than they are used to. If they’re happy to skip over this, however, they’ll still find plenty of interesting things that aren’t widely covered elsewhere.

Paperback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Andrew May - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Infinite Book – John D. Barrow ****

Authors are often asked to review books on a topic they’ve written on themselves. The reasoning is sensible – they ought to know something about the subject – but there’s always that uneasy suspicion that there’s going to be a bit of bias creeping in. So I think it’s only fair to admit up front that I have written a book on infinity (of which more later). Infinity is a wonderful subject, because it’s intimately mind-bending (if the combination sounds paradoxical, that’s what infinity is all about) and gives you the chance to pull in all sorts of different concepts and assocations along the way, something Barrow does with great gusto. There’s a surprisingly large amount of coverage here for God, and for the universe, and the book jumps around from Aristotle to Hilbert’s Infinite Hotel (explained at great length), from the paradoxes of infinite sets to the paradoxes of time travel. Overall it’s an enjoyable journey that gives plenty of opportunity to be amazed and surprised. The...

Battle of the Big Bang - Niayesh Afshordi and Phil Harper *****

It's popular science Jim, but not as we know it. There have been plenty of popular science books about the big bang and the origins of the universe (including my own Before the Big Bang ) but this is unique. In part this is because it's bang up to date (so to speak), but more so because rather than present the theories in an approachable fashion, the book dives into the (sometimes extremely heated) disputed debates between theoreticians. It's still popular science as there's no maths, but it gives a real insight into the alternative viewpoints and depth of feeling. We begin with a rapid dash through the history of cosmological ideas, passing rapidly through the steady state/big bang debate (though not covering Hoyle's modified steady state that dealt with the 'early universe' issues), then slow down as we get into the various possibilities that would emerge once inflation arrived on the scene (including, of course, the theories that do away with inflation). ...

Govert Schilling - Five Way Interview

Govert Schilling is an acclaimed and prize-winning freelance astronomy writer and broadcaster in the Netherlands. His articles appear in Dutch newspapers and magazines, but he also has written for New Scientist, Science and BBC Sky at Night Magazine, and he is a contributing editor of Sky & Telescope. He wrote dozens of books (including a couple of children’s books) on a wide variety of astronomical topics, many of which have been translated into English, German, Italian, and Chinese, among other languages. In 2007, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) named asteroid 10986 Govert after him, and in 2014, he received the David N. Schramm Award for high-energy astrophysics science journalism from the High Energy Astrophysics Division of the American Astronomical Society.His latest book is Target Earth . Why science? We live in troubling times. Fake news and conspiracy theories abound, and trust in science is diminishing. Many adults don't seem to realize that almost everythi...