Skip to main content

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth.

As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I've never yet come across a time-denying physicist who doesn't recognise the existence of dinner time.

We begin with what's meant by time (not as easy to establish as you might think), which leads through to predictions about the future (in essence what most science involves). There's plenty here on the distinction between past, present and future and what each of these really is. We then get relativistic, treating time as a dimension, introducing spacetime and the implications of first the special and then the general theory of relativity. (John Gribbin would be irritated that Al-Khalili refers to these as special and general relativity rather than special and general theories.) We then get onto entropy and its definition of time's arrow - with implications for a beginning and end of time - before taking in time as an emergent property and concluding that time is real.

If I have one criticism it is that throughout Al-Khalili keeps things at a descriptive level rather than allowing any mathematics to enter the fray: I'm not expecting equations, but there can be an in-between stance where we understand that the verbal description doesn't quite hack it (and, for instance, I've always thought it's a good idea to have at least an appendix with a mathematical example of time dilation, as the maths is so simple and makes the unlikely outcome more clear).

This extends to a degree to some of the examples given where, without a bit more depth what's said sounds a touch unlikely. So, for instance, we are given examples of changes that don't involve time: 'one can easily think of examples involving things that change, but which are not necessarily changing over time. Atmospheric pressure changes when you climb to higher altitudes, the speed of a car changes when you press your foot on the accelerator pedal...' Yet these examples happen over time: neither can be instantaneous. 

There's also the usual description of the way that systems evolving with time don't have a direction, because 'such equations run equally well forwards and backwards in time'. But (at least at this point in the book) there is no consideration given to this being 'spherical cow' rather than real world physics. A classic example is a pair of billiard balls colliding. You can run the 'movie' of what you see backwards and it's indistinguishable. But this is only true on a non-existent frictionless table - and if you cherry pick an isolated system in time, excluding the bits where the motion starts and ends - though if, like me, you find this cheat very irritating, it is resolved in the final chapter.

These are small moans, though. Al-Khalili takes us through mind-bending subject with panache, making what could be a dense and difficult topic approachable and engaging. 

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who Invented the Computer? – Ian Watson

Ian Watson is the author of  The Universal Machine  and featured in a recent  Four Way Interview . Saturday June 23 2012 was the centenary of the birth of Alan Turing, the troubled genius who invented the modern computer. Why though do so few people recognize his name and his great achievements? In 1936 English mathematician Alan Turing, published a paper,  On Computable Numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem . This became the foundation of computing. In it Turing presented a theoretical machine that could solve any problem that could be described by instructions encoded on a paper tape. A Turing Machine could calculate square roots, whilst another might solve Sudoku puzzles. Turing demonstrated you could construct a single  Universal Machine  that could simulate any Turing Machine. One machine solving any problem for which a program could be written – sound familiar? He’d invented the computer. Then,  computers  were peop...

Ignorance: How it drives science – Stuart Firestein *****

This is a delightful little book that really gets you thinking. I stress the ‘little’ part not as a negative, but as a good thing. There is nothing worse than fat, bloated popular science books where the author feels they have to get 120,000 words to be taken seriously. This is the sort of book that can be read in a couple of hours – but you will get so much more out of it than one of those tedious doorstops. The premise underlying the book is in once sense extremely simple, yet is fundamental to an understanding of what science is and what scientists do. And it is an understanding that is totally at odds with the typical way science is portrayed both in university lectures and popular science books. As Stuart Firestein points out, what is important is not the facts, but rather the area of ignorance. The interesting part and the fundamental heart of science is not about what we know, but about what we don’t know and where we want to look next. Take this lovely quote: ‘Working ...

The Star Book – Peter Grego ****

This attractive landscape format book combines an excellent introduction to the stars and basic astronomy with a set of star maps, plus in depth looks at some of the stars featured, with a  bonus section on the solar system. Amazon says it’s a hardback, but in fact it’s a paperback with a rather ingenious cover – you can’t tell from the photo, but the words ‘The Star Book’ are punched through as a series of holes that show the white paper of the next page beneath. Like many astronomy/space books, the cover lacks shelf appeal because it is mostly black, but at least there is some original thought here. Unlike many books in this format which tend to concentrate on the pictures, there is a good deal of excellent text by Peter Grego, so there was no feeling that you were only getting the star maps and star ‘biographies’, something these days much more suited to an iPad or smartphone app. Instead, the opening 30 or so pages give a very good introduction that would be valuable to ...