Skip to main content

Pavane (SF) - Keith Roberts ****

The sub-genre of alternate history has always felt an uncomfortable fit with science fiction - but where else are you going to put it? Two of my favourite classics of the genre both posit a modern England where the Reformation didn't happen and the Catholic Church is still a powerful force. I've already reviewed The Alteration by Kingsley Amis, but I've now re-read Keith Roberts' 1968 classic Pavane.

Though usually described as a novel, this is really a linked set of short novellas, featuring an 1960s Britain that follows on from Queen Elizabeth I being assassinated, resulting in a clamping down of Catholicism that also has ended with an iron grip across half the world. The novellas present (mostly) charming snapshots of a rural, low-tech England where steam traction engines pull trains of wagons across the country, long distance communication is largely by semaphore towers and monks work on lithographic printing presses.

Roberts does a wonderful job of giving us the feel, for instance, of operating a steam engine - I used drive miniature steam engines in a park in my teens and all the details are very evocative of the real thing. He endows his bucolic fictional world with what seems at first to be a paean to the joys of pre-industrial life. But in each case the shiny red apple of the story has a worm inside. The opening novella featuring the tractions engines involves a driver whose beloved girl won't marry him, and who has to deal with an attack on his train by robbers. The young semaphore signaller is attacked by a wild cat and appears to be looked after by someone he suspects is a fairy. A monk excellent at artwork is told to document the torture chambers of the inquisition, loses his mind and becomes a figurehead for rebellion. And so on.

The first two novellas for me are the best - as Roberts then weaves more dissent to the Catholics, the cohesion of his world building seems not quite as good. And there are a couple of oddities - why, for

 instance, have all the towns with Roman origins reverted to their Roman names (Londinium for London, for instance, or more obscurely Dunorvaria for Dorchester)? This seems a rather forced way to quickly give a sense of difference, rather than something the Catholic Church would do - it certainly hasn't in countries that remained strongly Catholic.

As the rebellion becomes stronger there's a flavour of mystico-paganism combined slightly oddly with Norse 'old gods', but that crystallises in to an English nationalist revolt against the foreign, heavy-handed power of Rome that has a strange pre-echo of Brexit about it.

One other oddity is cover designs. By far the most visceral of the technical content is those traction engines and the semaphore signal stations, yet neither is shown on the current edition - and on the cover of my 1974 edition, the artist appears not to have read the book at all and included a fairly random set of images that seem to be designed for a totally different fantasy story.

Despite this, though, the pull between modernity (with the background gradual introduction of the likes of internal combustion engines and electricity) and the otherwise nineteenth century technology alongside the pastoral setting is brilliantly managed. This is a book that stays with you a long time after reading it.

Paperback:   
it
: 
 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...

When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows: Steven Pinker *****

In the past I've found Steven Pinker's books hypnotic - I drift along enjoying the words and feeling I'm getting something deep from it without anything much sinking in. This one was different - it was sometimes a little harder to get your head around the underlying concept, descending as it tends to into infinite regression, but overall I did feel I'd gained a lot.  Pinker's focus here is 'common knowledge' which is when not only do we both/all know something, but we know that the other(s) know as well and the implications this has for human interactions. One entertaining thing to emerge from this is the ability to get into infinite loops of the 'I know that you know that I know that...' variety. Although we aren't mentally equipped to deal with more than a handful of iterations, we are told that a simple but limited interaction like a text exchange strictly needs the full infinite set to be definitive. For example, if you and a friend are tryin...