Skip to main content

Before Superman (SF) - Joshua Glenn (ed.) ***

This is the latest in MIT Press's Radium Age series, which aims to fill in the largely ignored proto-SF work that was produced between the end of the nineteenth century and the flourishing of science fiction of the 1930s and 40s. These have ranged from the dire Theodore Savage to the interesting opening book of the series Voices from the Radium Age.

The idea of this volume is to give us stories with characters who are more than human, with distinctly mixed results. A lot of what we get are actually extracts from novels (or in one case a George Bernard Shaw play), which makes the useful as illustrations, but not particularly engaging as stories in their own right.

A starting point would be to point out that most 'superhuman' stories are more fantasy than science fiction. The same applies to superhero comics and films of today. With the exception of Batman and Iron Man, the vast majority of superheroes have abilities that are nothing more than magic powers wearing scientific fancy dress (the same applies to Star Wars, of course). In his introduction, Joshua Glenn gives us several reasons for the rise and popularity of this kind of story, inevitably going into deep possibilities like being responses to Dawinian evolution or being inspired by Nietzsche. But for me it seems more likely these are simply children's fantasies of being big and powerful writ large.

A lot of writing of this period is turgid - in the case of some of these, notably the magnificently tedious Hannibal Lepsius by M. P. Shiel from 1909, not having any plot development. This is also the case amongst others with the extract from Shaw's 1921 play Tragedy of an Elderly Gentleman: A.D. 3000, extracted as Zoo. 

Others are moderately readable. We get, for instance, Hugo Gernsback's 1912 Ralph 124C 41+, a story often cited in the SF literature, which I'd never actually read. Admittedly the plot is essentially 'Damsel in distress; scientist waves magic wand (sorry, engages ridiculously unlikely technology) and rescues her.' But at least something happens. Then there's Francis Stevens' 1904 The Curious Experience of Thomas Dunbar, where an accident with a new element (groan) gives the eponymous Dunbar super strength. Also reasonably readable, though already featured in the series in The Heads of Cerberus. One of the best is Glenn's own translation from the French of the closing chapter of Alfred Jerry's 1902 The Supermale - it's perhaps because the translation is modern that the style is more readable (though the premise is somewhat painful).

We also get a couple of pieces from better remembered authors H. Rider Haggard and Edgar Rice Burroughs - both very pulpy producers of fiction that has dated fairly badly, but at least authors with some concept of storytelling. It's not that stories from this period have to be badly written by modern standards. The Sherlock Holmes stories still hold up wonderfully, and much of H. G. Wells' writing is very readable, but it does seem that one of the reasons this is a largely forgotten period is that much of the writing was painfully slow for the modern reader.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to Keep a Plane in the Sky - Alex Davies ****

If there's one big gap in the science writing sphere, it's popular engineering (you can quibble over whether engineering is science, but where else would you put popular engineering?). Alex Davies does the field a real service with this insightful introduction to the world of test engineering. The concept is simple. If we build something and sell it, we need to test it to make sure that it won't fail in a way that's dangerous to the consumer. The most obvious example is airliners, which feature at some length, but this applies to everything from cuddly toys to hair straighteners: someone needs to predict what could go wrong and to put the product through its paces to see if it will survive under any reasonable circumstances. When Davies is telling a story of test engineering in action, the book is a delight. He opens with the way that real bears are used to test if bears can get into coolers and trash cans - and the impressive ways these animals can  circumvent human in...
Post a Comment
Read more

On the Equality of All Things - Carlo Rovelli ****

There is a wide gulf between the worldviews of physicists and philosophers. Many physicists present a rather sweetly naive, child-like view of the world, where philosophers bring a distinctly more adult, cynical tone. This being the case, it can be a little worrying when a physicist dips a toe into the philosophical mire. Infamously, in The Grand Design , Stephen Hawking and co-author Leonard Mlodinow told us that philosophy was now dead because science could deal with anything it had previously been needed for. Thankfully, Carlo Rovelli is not trying to do away with philosophy, though it has to be said that when he veers into the topic that physicist's naivety can make it feel like the philosophising of an earnest eighteen-year-old. Take the opening paragraph, which tells us 'electrons and minds, stones and laws, judgements and galaxies do not essentially differ in nature from one another. They are notions that illuminate each other'. I almost expected a Pink Floyd soundtr...
Post a Comment
Read more