Skip to main content

Frank Close - Five Way Interview

Frank Close is Emeritus Professor of Theoretical Physics at the University of Oxford. He was one time head of theory at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory and head of communications and public education at CERN. He is a Fellow of the Royal Society and winner of their Michael Faraday Prize for excellence in science communication in 2013. He is the only professional scientist to have won the Association of British Science Writers Prize on 3 occasions. Author of 22 books on science including The Cosmic Onion, Trinity, and Elusive - the story of the elusive Peter Higgs and his boson, his latest book is Destroyer of Worlds - the deep history of the nuclear age.

Why this book?

One afternoon in 2022 I was walking into town with my 10-year-old grandson, Jack, when he started asking - and remarkably telling me what he knew - about Tsar Bomba, the most powerful bomb ever detonated. I had been thinking about the history of nuclear physics for many years, but it was this conversation that was the final spark for this book. So came about my account of how the discovery of a smudge on a photographic plate in 1896 - the first hint of nuclear energy - in just 70 years gave humanity the ability to destroy itself in a blast more powerful than anything since that which killed the dinosaurs 65 million years ago.

Another fateful occurrence led me to start writing Destroyer of Worlds the following year while being treated for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. From June 2023, during 21 weeks of chemotherapy and three of radiotherapy, I used the enforced withdrawal to complete a first draft. The irony then struck me. Several of the saga’s heroic pioneers, such as Marie and Pierre Curie, their daughter Irene, her husband Frederic Joliot, Enrico Fermi, and others, all suffered radiation damage and even fatal cancers because of their research. Today the biological hazards of untargeted radiation are understood.

Radiation’s potential for good is also recognised. Radiation therapy harnesses the destructiveness of radioactivity by directing high levels of radiation at cancerous tissues. Another way to use radioactivity in medicine, in much smaller doses, is to label substances by attaching radioactive tracers. The tracers are tiny amounts of radioactive elements, which are injected into the body. Atoms containing these radioactive nuclei take part in biochemical reactions in the same way that the normal atoms do, and by following their radioactive emissions a picture of what is happening inside the patient is built.

Properly directed these radiations succeed, whereas when used at random they can be destroyers. In 2023 I benefited from the positive uses of targeted atomic energy, such as X-rays, gamma rays, radioactive isotopes, and positron emission. So for me Destroyer of Worlds is synonymous with the teams of radiologists, oncologists, and haematologists at Oxford, who are collectively my Destroyers of Cancerous Microworlds.

Why the specific date range 1895-1965? 

The discovery of X-rays in 1895 led to the discovery of radioactivity the following year and realisation that atoms are not the ultimate seeds of matter. This sparked an extraordinary chain of events that would unleash the atomic age. I was intrigued by how the discovery of a faint smudge on a photographic plate - like a clue at a crime scene - led scientific ‘detectives’ to unravel the mystery. How do you start? How did the understanding emerge and then, what did humanity do with the knowledge? Having been inspired to find out about Tsar Bomba, I made that my conclusion. These insights were mature by the 1960s, and I chose 1965 merely to illustrate a 70 years span.

You mention quite a few points in history where many accounts may have it wrong - which stands out most to you and why?

One which I regard as a ‘myth’ - Szilard’s epiphany about the chain reaction - and one more serious - the credit for discovery of nuclear fission. Szilard claimed to have had his idea while waiting for cross lights to change, in London, in 1933. Unless he was in a time machine, this is more likely to have been a false memory from decades later when he was living in the USA and using crosswalks regularly.

 Nuclear fission, traditionally credited to Hahn and Strassmann in Berlin, was discovered - in the sense of being explained and understood - by Lise Meitner and Otto Frisch on a tree stump in a Swedish forest. In 1937, Irene Curie had irradiated uranium with neutrons and found lanthanum (element 57 in the periodic table); she could make no sense of it and did no more. In 1938, Hahn and Strassmann did effectively the same, and found barium (element 56). They too did not understand it. The sole difference with Curie was that Hahn wrote to Meitner, his long-time collaborator (now fled from Nazi Germany), seeking explanation. Meitner and Frisch found the explanation. They 'discovered' nuclear fission; Hahn (who later got the Nobel Prize, alone) had done little more than Curie.

What’s next?

Preparing and giving lots of talks, podcasts and interviews, followed by a rest!

What’s exciting you at the moment?

I am interested in a forgotten genius, John Clive Ward. In 1950, he discovered the mathematical 'identities' that enabled a viable theory of electromagnetic forces - quantum electrodynamics - to emerge. In 1964 his work with Abdus Salam, uniting electromagnetic and weak nuclear forces, led to a Nobel for Salam, from which Ward was controversially omitted. In the meantime, Ward had secretly been co-opted by the UK Government in 1955 to solve the mathematical problems underpinning design of a hydrogen bomb. After having his solution side-lined, Ward quit the project in a fit of pique, which created mayhem for the UK security services. In 1985, he wrote to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher seeking recognition for this work. For the rest of his life, he became paranoid, convinced that the security services had murdered two of his colleagues and that his life was in danger. While this was not the case, his paranoia had a sound basis, as his approach to Thatcher placed him at the heart of an international intrigue that he himself was unaware of. To say more would give away the punchline!

These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...