Skip to main content

The Origin of Language - Madeleine Beekman *****

I'm always a little wary of popular science books that start with a personal story, but I'll make an exception for Madeleine Beekman's excellent book, which sets out a possible explanation of our ability to speak, because the approach fits in with a well-balanced combination of storytelling and scientific information. 

There have been a good number of books that either set out to explain some of our species' physical oddities or abilities that seem to set us apart from other animals. Twenty years ago I was impressed by Clive Bromhall's The Eternal Child, which suggested retaining infantile features (neoteny) enabled us to exist more effectively in large groups, while  many authors have attempted to highlight aspects of being human that set us apart (as was the case with storytelling in Brainjacking). Here Beekman first takes us through what palaeontology can tell us about the development our biological form, then explores the function of speech and language.

In many ways her thesis pulls together the two aspects mentioned above: first there is surviving in larger groups: she points out a human infant not only needs support for many years but also is very difficult to rear solo, requiring a support network of some sort to keep it viable. And secondly there is the way that speech and story enable us to link and bind the members of those networks. Beekman makes an impressive case for an evolutionary development that brings together our physical limitations, large brain, and the years of development required before we can operate independently.

This is all done in a lightly handled, readable fashion. This is very different from a 'theory of language' type book - it is about being human and the importance of language in enabling that. Where many language theories have focused on other aspects of human development - such as the need to be able to hunt effectively, or a link to developing tools - Beekman gives what feels a much more natural explanation in an ability that is totally tied into our neotenous nature, with the existence of infants that need so much support going hand in hand with a social environment to provide that support.

Perhaps because I've already read excellent human palaeontology books such as Henry Gee's The Accidental Species, I was slightly less interested in the section that dealt with this aspect, but even so, overall this a fascinating addition to the field.

Hardback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...