Skip to main content

The Big Questions of Science - Antonino del Popolo ***

For a particular audience, this is an interesting book. Specifically, popular science readers who want to get their hands a little dirty - to dig in a little more to what is happening in the science than a high level overview. Antonino del Popolo (an Italian physics professor) addresses a range of 'big questions', though apart from one about life it would have been more accurate to call this The Big Questions of Physics.

The topics covered include big picture items, such as 'Why is there something rather than nothing?' and 'Are there other universes?' and more focused questions such as 'What is a black hole?' and 'Can we travel through time?' These queries (strictly, one section 'What the World Looks Like Seen From a Ray of Light' isn't a question - and is really more 'What's the special theory of relativity about?') get about 20 pages each - enough to give an effective overview and sometimes to dig in with some alacrity.

The writing style can feel somewhat textbook lite. For example, when dealing with the relativity of simultaneity there is a paragraph that begins: 'Consider a train moving with speed v to the right. Consider an observer S', standing inside the train, and another, S, standing on the platform. Two lightning bolts simultaneously strike the train at points A and B. Suppose that when this happens, the observer on the platform is at the midpoint M, between A and B, and the observer on the train is also at the midpoint M', between A and B...' and so on. One of the lessons of making science accessible is to move away from the obscure-feeling labelling used in more rigorous approaches, but here it is a little turgid.

Like many academic writers, del Popolo falls for the error of making practically every sentence a fact statement, so it can sometimes feel like reading a set of bullet points, rather than proper writing with narrative flow. If the reader can cope with this, though, we get a good picture. Unusually, del Popolo even gives a quite balanced picture of dark matter - admittedly that section is almost all on various dark matter particle possibilities. But in the final page he admits 'the situation is complex: we have no certain proof of the existence of dark matter, and at the same time, we do not have a modified theory of gravity that could replace dark matter.' It would be interesting to see if recent discoveries on early universes would sway this opinion at all.

A tiny minority of academics are really good at communicating with the general public. This isn't always a limit on the success of a book (think A Brief History of Time), but it can make for dry reading. I wouldn't say that del Popolo is a natural communicator, but he gets the message across and delivers a surprising amount of detail without getting into mathematics. This definitely isn't for everyone - but for someone who doesn't want to go to textbook level, but would like to know a little more on a range of physics and cosmology questions, this is an effective vehicle. Sadly, though, Big Questions is ludicrously expensive even as an ebook, so likely to be one to get from the library.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more