Skip to main content

Pagans (SF) - James Alistair Henry *****

There's a fascinating sub-genre of science fiction known as alternate history. The idea is that at some point in the past, history diverged from reality, resulting in a different present. Perhaps the most acclaimed of these books is Kingsley Amis's The Alteration, set in a modern England where there had not been a reformation - but James Alistair Henry arguably does even better by giving us a present where Britain is a third world country, still divided between Celts in the west and Saxons in the East. Neither the Normans nor Christianity have any significant impact.

In itself this is a clever idea, but what makes it absolutely excellent is mixing in a police procedural murder mystery, where the investigation is being undertaken by a Celtic DI, Drustan, who has to work in London alongside Aedith, a Saxon reeve of equivalent rank, who also happens to be daughter of the Earl of Mercia. While you could argue about a few historical aspects, it's effectively done and has a plot that drives along dramatically with a lot more than a few lives at stake. It was one of the most un-put-down-able books I've read in ages.

On top of the police procedural, cultural differences and politicking between the different regions there is also the complexity of a minority cult known as the Fishers who some think are criminals, others peacemakers who are trying to achieve a united island. It's one of their number, nailed to a tree, who is the murder victim that starts it all off. Although I loved the characteristics of the different cultures, they felt a touch stereotyped - all Saxons seemed to live on lumps of venison, for example, while the Celts all still wore torcs. It seemed that the whole country was preserved in cultural aspic. If you think of how much things have changed since, say, 1066 in clothing, hairstyles attitudes over the centuries, these seemed fixed here. Surely they would have changed more over time?

It was also hard to pin down exactly where the divergence from our history was supposed to have occurred. There was no Norman conquest, so that put it pre-1066, but the Christian bible appeared to be the same as is now, putting it after the Council of Rome in 382. However, this was a Britain without a history of Christianity, so this probably puts it before Augustine became the first Archbishop of Canterbury in 597. And what happened to the earlier Celtic Christianity - all forgotten? This is fun speculation if you are into history - but somewhat misses the point of the book, and risks breaking the butterfly on the wheel.

What really makes Pagans is the juxtaposition of the cultural and tribal aspects that hark back 1500 years with smartphones and drones. It's a similar appeal to urban fantasy, where it's the clash between ordinary modern life and magic that has such an impact. In fact I have seen this book described as urban fantasy - but apart from a couple of brief appearances of a mysterious person which may be fantasy element, there is nothing here that deviates from solid, science fiction, alternate history. The book's a delight: read it!

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond Belief - Helen Pearson *****

Apparently it comes as a surprise to many that medicine was not particularly scientific until the end of the twentieth century (to be honest, it's no surprise to me - we had a GP who used homeopathy in the 90s). Instead it was based on anecdotal guidance - the kind of thing that appeared to work. Evidence-based medicine has since improved the field, trying where possible to base decisions on evidence, ideally based on randomised controlled trials. The first part of Helen Pearson's book covers this well - though I think it's by far the least interesting part of what we discover. Instead what's truly fascinating is the rest of it, looking at a wide range of other fields where evidence was rarely properly used and that are only now starting to dip a toe in the water. These include social policy, policing, conservation, business and education. The main part of the book gives us examples of how bad these areas have been in terms of basing decisions on what's always been ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Random Universe - Andrew Jaffe *****

This is an absolutely fascinating book for anyone interested in the way that science really works, bearing in mind the difficulties of having to base our models and theories on induction. Andrew Jaffe introduces the difficulties we face when trying to take a scientific view because largely we are dependent on induction: predicting the future from what has previously been observed. He explores what probability is, the two key ways of looking at it (frequentist and Bayesian) and how scientists use (or misuse it) to work out the implications of their experiments for hypotheses. This is then expanded into looking at the nature of scientific models and the philosophy of science before heading out to entropy, quantum randomness and attempting to achieve meaningful cosmology with its potential dearth of evidence.  The topic might sound a little dry, but in fact Jaffe does it with good humour and a very readable style. For example, he uses measuring his daughter's height by making marks on...
Post a Comment
Read more

God: the Science, the Evidence - Michel-Yves Bolloré and Olivier Bonnassies ***

This is, to say the least, an oddity, but a fascinating one. A translation of a French bestseller, it aims to put forward an examination of the scientific evidence for the existence of a deity… and various other things, as this is a very oddly structured book (more on that in a moment). In The God Delusion , Richard Dawkins suggested that we should treat the existence of God as a scientific claim, which is exactly what the authors do reasonably well in the main part of the book. They argue that three pieces of scientific evidence in particular are supportive of the existence of a (generic) creator of the universe. These are that the universe had a beginning, the fine tuning of natural constants and the unlikeliness of life.  To support their evidence, Bolloré and Bonnassies give a reasonable introduction to thermodynamics and cosmology. They suggest that the expected heat death of the universe implies a beginning (for good thermodynamic reasons), and rightly give the impression tha...
Post a Comment
Read more