Gnomon (SF) - Nick Harkaway ****

This massive book (more on that in a moment) split my opinion more than any other I've ever read. When I read the opening chapter, where Inspector Mielikki Neith begins her investigation of what happened when a suspect died in the mentally invasive interrogation technique of her time I was hooked. Nick Harkaway's concept of a future Britain where practically all information is available to everyone and true democracy exists, with all decisions made by the people, is beautifully realised, and he wonderfully portrays as a utopia balanced on a knife edge of plunging into dystopia.

Then I got to the next chapter, which dismayed me, as it appeared Harkaway had fallen for the irritating clichéd structure so common in modern novels of switching from chapter to chapter between different main characters and points of view, which eventually pull together. I found it tedious and just wanted to get back to Neith's story.

Soon after, I discover that things aren't what they seem, and these interlaced chapters from different viewpoints aren't set in the real world - which pulls the whole thing back to being brilliant (though I still wanted as much as possible to stick with Neith).

Having finally got through the whole thing, the Neith sections are some of the best SF I've read in years - but, for me, the interrupting sections pull the whole thing down. And it's way too long. My paperback copy was getting on for 700 pages, with ridiculously small print. I was just about okay reading the Neith sections, which are in a serif font, but the other parts are sans serif and really hard to read. It might seem a trivial point, but it didn't make reading a pleasant experience. Although those non-real-world sections have an important part to play, they could have been cut down hugely without any loss of plot - they were, frankly, very self-indulgent. Several times I almost gave up because of them - then got back to another Neith section and once more was captivated.

Overall, I'm glad I read it. The mainline sections as the Inspector struggles to understand what's going on (with a big twist at the end) and as the crime involved gets more complex are wonderful. But it could have been wonderful throughout if only those inner world, sans serif sections had been ruthlessly pruned.

Paperback:

Kindle:
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...

Search This Blog