Titanium Noir (SF) - Nick Harkaway *****

Of all the sub-genres, arguably the two most comfortable bedfellows are gumshoe noir and dystopian science fiction. It’s part of the appeal of the movie Blade Runner, and it can be even more effective when done brilliantly in a novel like Titanium Noir. Nick Harkaway gets the whole vibe to perfection - his detective Cal Sounder has all the traits of a Raymond Chandler or Dashiell Hammett protagonist, in a technological future without ever slipping into pastiche or parody.

The nearish future setting has two tiers of humanity with the ultra-rich and super-privileged few able to renew their youth, in the process becoming 'titans' - not only does the procedure fix all ills and make them young again, each time it is taken, it makes them bigger, stronger and heavier. (Harkaway mostly gets away with this despite the usual giant problem of mass going up with the cube of the person’s size while bone strength only goes up with the square - he does this by giving the titans increasingly huge bones.)

Sounder is brought in as a consultant by the police when a case involves titans because of a backstory that is gradually revealed - and we begin with a murder of one of their kind. From here, things rapidly get twisty and challenging, making for a very satisfying read. There are a couple of extremely dramatic fight scenes: I don’t know if a move in the first one is physically possible, but it’s not one I am going to forget any time soon. It may appear in several nightmares.

The whole is somehow even better than the sum of the parts - this book is perfectly crafted. I said of Harkaway’s massive doorstop of a novel Gnomon that it would have been great if only unnecessary aspects of it had been cut down. Titanium Noir has all the intrigue and cleverness of Gnomon with the unnecessary extra weight trimmed away - it is simply the best SF novel I’ve read this year. By far.

Hardback:

Kindle:
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you

Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically? Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...

Search This Blog