Skip to main content

Plato's Labyrinth (SF) - Michael Carroll ***

This is an interesting contribution to Springer's innovative 'Science and Fiction' series, which includes both SF novels and non-fiction books about science and science fiction. It is Michael Carroll's fourth contribution to the series that I've read, preceded by On the Shores of Titan's Farthest Sea, Europa's Lost Expedition and Lords of the Ice Moons. As with its predecessors, there is an interesting 'now the science part' at the end, covering wide ranging topics - in this case from quantum physics to palaeontology.

Carroll has improved on the previous book - each novel seems to step up a notch from the last. By far the biggest advantage this title has is in moving the setting to Earth - Carroll's writing works better here than in hypothetical outer planet moonscapes. In fact, the first part of the book works so well I was entirely ready to give it four or five stars, but there were a couple of issues as I continued to read that dragged it back down. 

At the heart of Plato's Labyrinth is time travel. We witness the first, tentative trips into the past and the battle between two rival groups developing the technology (one team decidedly shady). I absolutely loved the way that Carroll tied in an early trip to the work of the Victorian artist and sculptor Benjamin Waterhouse Hawkins, the man behind the Crystal Palace dinosaur sculptures in London and a set of sadly wrecked equivalents in New York. If Carroll had remained focused on this strand of the plot Plato's Labyrinth could have been a superb novel (though it would have needed a different title).

Where things go a little astray is the sheer number of other plot elements that get piled in. So we've also got a quantum theory many worlds interpretation twist to the tale, a significant Ancient Greek Minoan strand, a pantomime villain who want to import Roman legionnaires to the present day in order to... well, I'm not really sure why. Throw in the mental disintegration of one character, a love story and an incompetent comedy private eye and there's just far too much going on - reflected in the fact that the book feels very long at 367 pages. It loses impetus about half way through.

Inevitably with fictional time travel technology close scrutiny uncovers issues. So, for instance, for no obvious reason, all non-living matter transported through time starts to disintegrate on arrival. Except the devices they use to recall the time machines don't disintegrate. On the plus side, Carroll has great fun devising a living organic equivalent of a camera. He also uses Ron Mallett's real life concept of a frame dragging spiral of light as the time travel mechanism - a neat touch, though in reality even if Mallett's idea works (many physicists doubt it), it couldn't deliver the results described here. However, it's a better-than-usual attempt at suspension of disbelief on the mechanisms of time travel.

I enjoyed reading this book, but an editor with experience of fiction should have ensured that Carroll focused more, pruning those messy plot lines and producing the outstanding novel that was promised by the opening chapters. Even so, definitely Carroll's best.

Paperback: 
Bookshop.org

  

Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more