Skip to main content

Hurricane Lizards and Plastic Squid - Thor Hanson ****

There have been many books on climate change, but Thor Hanson's quirkily titled contribution takes quite a different tack - it's about the impact climate change has on species and how they respond through moving, adapting, evolving or clinging on to a remnant of their original habitat.

This could have been a dull and worthy catalogue of doom, but Hanson's personal and chatty approach gives us a more balanced insight - sometimes it's a relatively good news story, though there is no doubt that remarkably small changes in climate can have a noticeable effect on the local flora and fauna, and in some cases, with nowhere to go and limited ability to adapt. this will lead to species being wiped out. 

The impact of climate change is illustrated through a whole host of different species. We meet marmot-like pikas and Joshua trees, dovekies and anole lizards (the 'hurricane lizards' of the title, which feature in a bizarre experiment involving a leaf blower to test how they cope with different wind strengths) and even strange locations that are able to maintain a colder climate than their surroundings, producing pockets of flora and fauna that haven't moved in response to a temperature rise.

Along the way there are plenty of personal stories, from fishing trips to experiments with his son on the impact of carbon dioxide, plus a couple of particularly impressive examples of situations where a scientist has set out to study a particular animal or plant behaviour with no consideration of the climate, only to have climate change forcefully take over the study, producing data on a totally different issue. Keeping the reader on side is one of Hanson's strong points. Just occasionally he tries a bit too hard - there's an occasion where he takes a whole page of text just to tell us that trees don't move in the normal sense, invoking everything from Birnam Wood to ents - but generally there is plenty to carry the reader along.

Although Hanson suffers a little from scientists' blinkers - in, for example, continuing to fly around the world, or in his contorted defence of his son's enthusiasm for an old petrol-hungry tractor - there is a more balanced realism here than is often seen in climate change polemics. This accompanies the reality that there have been plenty of examples of climate change in the past which have also had huge impacts on species distribution or extinction. Hanson recognises that we can't preserve things as they are in aspic - but equally makes clear just how complex the interplay of species is, so that the movement of a species that seems to have no obvious impact can, through the chain of interaction with other species around it, result in radical shifts that have impact on many other species, including humans.

An enjoyable, thought provoking book.

Hardback: 
Bookshop.org

  

Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...