Skip to main content

Into the Anthropocosmos - Ariel Ekblaw ***

This is a really strange one. The book is subtitled 'a whole space catalog from the MIT Space Exploration Initiative'. I'm assuming that 'whole space catalog' is a nostalgic reference for those of us old enough to remember the Whole Earth Catalog, that 60s/70s oddity that was somehow a crossover between an Argos catalogue and the DIY-eco-world (and whose idea of 'whole Earth' was about as whole Earth as the World Series). 

The original was a fun browse, even though it would be hard to imagine anyone ever actually using it to buy anything. This new venture claims to be a 'lavishly illustrated catalog of space technology of the future'. I guess the idea is that if you are a billionaire kitting out your latest space mission, or planning your space habitat, this is where you browse to pick up your ideas. Except when you look through the book it really isn't a catalog (sorry, catalogue). There are no sales links... and no prices.

What we get instead is a bit like one of those lavishly illustrated books that organisations produce for their staff and investors, where you get a few large photos on each project and some rather high level text on bits of equipment and studies being produced, presumably by MIT. I get a regular magazine from my old physics department known as CavMag, that tells me what's going on at the Cavendish Laboratory - this feels a bit like a larger scale, far more expensive version of that.

The book is divided into rather entertainingly named sections. We get biome, the envirome (sic), the exobiome, before the disappointingly named 'experiments, orbits and exhibitions'. (Why not experiome, orbome and exhibome?) And finally there's the downright plodding outreach and community. What we really have here is a summary of space-oriented projects, which unless you are either involved in MIT's work, a friend and relation of someone who is, or working in the space industry, probably isn't going to get you excited.

I randomly opened the book to give a bit more detail on a couple of the items in the collection. The first was in the envirome section and entitled 'Reinventing the spindle.' The is apparently 'an art project where the artist investigates textile crafts in microgravity and low-gravity environment, using the "experiments" [my inverted commas] as a basis for greater conversation around the ramifications of space research and colonisation.' Hmm. Another random flip took me to 'EBIFA' in the biome section. This stands for 'Everything is Beautiful Far Away' and is 'a mission and a fantasy realised, in which a wisdom tooth is sent to outer space and back down to Earth again.' Apparently 'The tooth tells the inconsequential but unique story of a person in this universe.' Okay.

I'm not sure I was lucky or unlucky that both those genuinely random selections uncovered smirk-inducing art projects. Other items in the book cover more straightforward space technology or experiments, from oscillating chemical reactions in zero gravity to fermentation in space. Some of these are very likely to produce useful information or starting points for technology for future space missions. Others... well, I wouldn't spend my money on them.

Outside those MIT people, friends and relations, I can't see many readers buying this (rather expensive) book. But it's worth a flip through in the library, if only to wonder how much connection those working in universities have to the real world.

Hardback: 
Bookshop.org

  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more