Skip to main content

Into the Anthropocosmos - Ariel Ekblaw ***

This is a really strange one. The book is subtitled 'a whole space catalog from the MIT Space Exploration Initiative'. I'm assuming that 'whole space catalog' is a nostalgic reference for those of us old enough to remember the Whole Earth Catalog, that 60s/70s oddity that was somehow a crossover between an Argos catalogue and the DIY-eco-world (and whose idea of 'whole Earth' was about as whole Earth as the World Series). 

The original was a fun browse, even though it would be hard to imagine anyone ever actually using it to buy anything. This new venture claims to be a 'lavishly illustrated catalog of space technology of the future'. I guess the idea is that if you are a billionaire kitting out your latest space mission, or planning your space habitat, this is where you browse to pick up your ideas. Except when you look through the book it really isn't a catalog (sorry, catalogue). There are no sales links... and no prices.

What we get instead is a bit like one of those lavishly illustrated books that organisations produce for their staff and investors, where you get a few large photos on each project and some rather high level text on bits of equipment and studies being produced, presumably by MIT. I get a regular magazine from my old physics department known as CavMag, that tells me what's going on at the Cavendish Laboratory - this feels a bit like a larger scale, far more expensive version of that.

The book is divided into rather entertainingly named sections. We get biome, the envirome (sic), the exobiome, before the disappointingly named 'experiments, orbits and exhibitions'. (Why not experiome, orbome and exhibome?) And finally there's the downright plodding outreach and community. What we really have here is a summary of space-oriented projects, which unless you are either involved in MIT's work, a friend and relation of someone who is, or working in the space industry, probably isn't going to get you excited.

I randomly opened the book to give a bit more detail on a couple of the items in the collection. The first was in the envirome section and entitled 'Reinventing the spindle.' The is apparently 'an art project where the artist investigates textile crafts in microgravity and low-gravity environment, using the "experiments" [my inverted commas] as a basis for greater conversation around the ramifications of space research and colonisation.' Hmm. Another random flip took me to 'EBIFA' in the biome section. This stands for 'Everything is Beautiful Far Away' and is 'a mission and a fantasy realised, in which a wisdom tooth is sent to outer space and back down to Earth again.' Apparently 'The tooth tells the inconsequential but unique story of a person in this universe.' Okay.

I'm not sure I was lucky or unlucky that both those genuinely random selections uncovered smirk-inducing art projects. Other items in the book cover more straightforward space technology or experiments, from oscillating chemical reactions in zero gravity to fermentation in space. Some of these are very likely to produce useful information or starting points for technology for future space missions. Others... well, I wouldn't spend my money on them.

Outside those MIT people, friends and relations, I can't see many readers buying this (rather expensive) book. But it's worth a flip through in the library, if only to wonder how much connection those working in universities have to the real world.

Hardback: 
Bookshop.org

  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Roger Highfield - Stephen Hawking: genius at work interview

Roger Highfield OBE is the Science Director of the Science Museum Group. Roger has visiting professorships at the Department of Chemistry, UCL, and at the Dunn School, University of Oxford, is a Fellow of the Academy of Medical Sciences, and a member of the Medical Research Council and Longitude Committee. He has written or co-authored ten popular science books, including two bestsellers. His latest title is Stephen Hawking: genius at work . Why science? There are three answers to this question, depending on context: Apollo; Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, along with the world’s worst nuclear accident at Chernobyl; and, finally, Nullius in verba . Growing up I enjoyed the sciencey side of TV programmes like Thunderbirds and The Avengers but became completely besotted when, in short trousers, I gazed up at the moon knowing that two astronauts had paid it a visit. As the Apollo programme unfolded, I became utterly obsessed. Today, more than half a century later, the moon landings are
Post a Comment
Read more

Space Oddities - Harry Cliff *****

In this delightfully readable book, Harry Cliff takes us into the anomalies that are starting to make areas of physics seems to be nearing a paradigm shift, just as occurred in the past with relativity and quantum theory. We start with, we are introduced to some past anomalies linked to changes in viewpoint, such as the precession of Mercury (explained by general relativity, though originally blamed on an undiscovered planet near the Sun), and then move on to a few examples of apparent discoveries being wrong: the BICEP2 evidence for inflation (where the result was caused by dust, not the polarisation being studied),  the disappearance of an interesting blip in LHC results, and an apparent mistake in the manipulation of numbers that resulted in alleged discovery of dark matter particles. These are used to explain how statistics plays a part, and the significance of sigmas . We go on to explore a range of anomalies in particle physics and cosmology that may indicate either a breakdown i
Post a Comment
Read more

Splinters of Infinity - Mark Wolverton ****

Many of us who read popular science regularly will be aware of the 'great debate' between American astronomers Harlow Shapley and Heber Curtis in 1920 over whether the universe was a single galaxy or many. Less familiar is the clash in the 1930s between American Nobel Prize winners Robert Millikan and Arthur Compton over the nature of cosmic rays. This not a book about the nature of cosmic rays as we now understand them, but rather explores this confrontation between heavyweight scientists. Millikan was the first in the fray, and often wrongly named in the press as discoverer of cosmic rays. He believed that this high energy radiation from above was made up of photons that ionised atoms in the atmosphere. One of the reasons he was determined that they should be photons was that this fitted with his thesis that the universe was in a constant state of creation: these photons, he thought, were produced in the birth of new atoms. This view seems to have been primarily driven by re
Post a Comment
Read more